Skip to main content

Houses in the Archaeology of the Tripillia—Cucuteni Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe

Part of the book series: One World Archaeology ((WORLDARCH))

Abstract

The excavation of burnt, and occasionally unburnt, houses forms a key element of the story of Tripillia–Cucuteni archaeological excavations, since the domestic zone in these groups was much more developed than the mortuary domain. In the 2,000-year period of development across a wide area from the Carpathians to the Dnieper valley, there were considerable changes in the ways that houses were designed and built and, especially, in the agglomerations which they formed. There is also much evidence for the transformations of structures originally designed as domestic dwellings into workshops, ritual centres and places with specialised storage facilities. Nonetheless, these changes were nothing but variations on a dominant theme of household and house continuity, which forms the principal embodiment of principles and practices in the longue durée for these groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worth noting that the level of erosion was minimal. Houses were found under 0.6–1.2m of relatively undisturbed loess.

Bibliography

  • Bailey, D. 1996. The life, time and works of house 59, Tell Ovcharovo, Bulgaria. In Neolithic houses in northwest Europe and beyond, eds. T. Darvill and J. Thomas, 143–156. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. 2005. Prehistoric figurines. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, C. 2007. Traian Dealul Fântânilor. Fenomenul Cucuteni A-B. Bucureşti: Muzeul Naţional de Istorie a României.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. 2003. Сакральнaй аспeкт архaтeктурa трипольских протогородов. In Трипольская культура в Украинe. Посeлeниe-гигант Тальянки, ed. A. Korvin-Piotrovsky, 18–21. Київ: Корвaн-Прeсс.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. 2004. Модeлa стaльцaв-тронaв. In Eнциклопeдaя Трипaльської Цивaлaзацaї, T./ II, ed. M.Ю. Biдeйко, 346–347. Київ: Укрполaграфмeдaа.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. 2005. Кeрамичeскиe модeли построeк трипольской культуры. Матeрaали та дослaджeння з архeологaї Схaдної України. Луганськ 4:93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н. Б. 2006. Архaтeктура трипaльських плeмeн Сeрeдньої Надднaпрянщини. In Охорона культурної спадщини Київської областa. Проблeми, матeрaали, дослaджeння, eds. X. Morgyn and M. Videiko, 42–62. Київ: Акадeмпeрaодика.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. 2007. Рeконструкцaя будaвeль трипaльської культури. Мeтодика та концeпцaї. In Трипaльська культура. Пошуки, вaдкриття, свaтовий контeкст, eds. S. Kot and M. Videiko, 29–48. Київ: Спадщина.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. 2008. Сакральний свaт Трипaльської цивaлaзацaї. Київ: Наш Час.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бурдо, Н.Б. and М.Ю. Bидeйко. 2004. Животноводство трипольской культуры в пeриод 5400–2750 гг. до н.э. Arheologia Bimaris 3:67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Чабанюк, B. 2008. Новыe экспeримeтальныe данныe по проблeмe трипольського домостроитeльства. In Трипольская культура в Украинe. Посeлeниe-гигант Тальянки., ed. A. Korvin-Piotrovsky, 211–226. Київ:Корвaн-Прeсс.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. and B. Gaydarska. 2006. Parts and wholes. Fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. and M. Videiko. 2011. The Tripillia culture mega-site near Nebelivka: summer 2009 season. Praehistorica (Prague) XXIX:79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V.G. 1945. Review of ‘Tripi’l’ska kultura’, Akademia Nauk Ukrainian S.S.R., Institut Arkheologiy, Kiev, 1940. Antiquity 19:203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C.R. 1999. 1942 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Economic Botany 53:188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotiugă, V. and O. Cotoi. 2004. Parcul arheologic experimental de la Cucuteni. In Cucuteni-Cetăţuie. Monografie arheologică., eds. M. Petrescu-Dîmboviţa and M-C. Văleanu, 337–350. Piatra Neamţ: Muzeul de Istorie i Arheologie Piatra Neamţ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudart, A. 1998. Architecture et société néolithique: l’unité et la variance de la maison danubienne. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dergachev, V. 1998. Karbunskii Klad. Chisinev: Akademiya Nauk Republiki Moldova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolukhanov, P.M. 2001. Alternative revolutions: hunter-gatherers, farmers and stock-breeders in the northwestern Pontic area. In Ancient interactions, eds. C. Renfrew and M. Levine, 13–24. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R. 1995. The limits to settlement growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaydarska, B., J. Chapman, A., Raduntcheva and B. Koleva. 2007. The chaîne opératoire approach to prehistoric figurines: an example from Dolnoslav, Bulgaria. In Image and Imagination, eds. C. Renfrew and I. Morley, 171–184. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbutas, M. 1982. The goddesses and gods of Old Europe. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Гусєв, С.О. 1995. Трипaльська культура Сeрeднього Побужжя. Biнниця: Антeкс-УЛТД.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale D., J. Chapman, N. Swann, M. Videiko and R. Villis. 2010. Early urbanism in Europe? Geophysical survey at Nebelivka, Ukraine. In Recent work in archaeological geophysics, abstracts booklet of a conference held at the Geological Society, London 15th Dec 2010, 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, N. 1996. Can we interpret figurines? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6:281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, D. 1987. Archaeology and mentality: the making of China. Representations 18:91–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidou, D. and M. Nikolaidou. 1997. Body imagery in the Aegean Neolithic: ideological implications of anthropomorphic figurines. In Invisible people and processes. Writing women and children into European archaeology, eds. J. Moore and E. Scott, 88–112. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Колeсников, А.Г. 1993 Трипольскоe общeство Срeднeго Поднeпровья. Опыт социальных рeконструкций в архeологии. Киeв: Наукова думка

    Google Scholar 

  • Круц, B.А. 2003. Трипольскиe площадки – рeзультат ритуального сожжeния домов. In Трипольская культура в Украинe. Посeлeниe-гигант Тальянки, ed. A. Korvin-Piotrovsky, 74–76. Київ: Корвaн-Прeсс.

    Google Scholar 

  • Кричeвський, Є.Ю. 1940. Розкопки на Коломийщинa a проблeма трипaльських площадок. Трипaльська культура. АН УРСР. IAА. – К.: Bид-во АН УРСР 1:279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Хвойка, B. 1901. Камeнный вeк Срeднeго Приднeпровья. Труды XI Архeологичeского съeзда в Киeвe в 1899 году 1:730–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarovici C.M. and G. Lazarovici. 2007. Arhitectura Neoliticuli şi Epocii Cuprului din România. 2 vols. Iaşi: Trinitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenneis, E. 2005. Traces du Rubané dans l’architecture Cucuteni? In Cucuteni. 120 years of research – time to sum up, eds. Gh. Dumitroaia, J. Chapman, O. Weller, C. Preoteasa, R. Munteanu, D. Nicola and D. Monah, 55–64. Piatra Neamţ: Neamţ County Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantu, C.M. 1998. Cultura Cucuteni. Evoluţie, cronologie, legături. Piatra Neamţ: Muzeul de Istorie Piatra Neamţ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangou, C. 1996. Assembling, displaying and dissembling Neolithic and Eneolithic figurines and models. Journal of European Archaeology 4:177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinescu-Bîlcu, S. 1973. Cultura Pre-cucuteni pe teritoriul României. Bucureşti: Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinescu-Bîlcu, S. 2000. Dwellings, pits. In Drăguşeni. A Cucutenian community, eds. S. Marinescu-Bîlcu and A. Bolomey, 25–48. Bucureşti: Editura Enciclopedică.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markyevich, V.I. 1981. Pozne-Tripolskie plemena severnoj Moldavii. Kishinev: Akademiya Nauk Republiki Moldova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Маркeвич, B.И. 1990. Домостроитeльство плeмeн культуры Трипольe-Кукутeнь. Раннeзeмлeдeльчeскиe посeлeния-гиганты трипольской культуры на Украинe. Тeз. докл. I полeвого сeминара. Тальянки.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monah, D. 1997. Plastică antropomorfă a culturii Cucuteni-Tripolie. Piatra Neamţ: Centrul de Cercetare a culturii Cucuteni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monah, D. and F. Monah. 1997. The last great Chalcolithic civilization of Old Europe. In Cucuteni. The last great Chalcolithic civilization of Europe, eds. C-M. Mantu, Gh. Dumitroaia and A. Tsaravopoulos, 15–95. Thessaloniki: Athena Printing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monah, D., Gh. Dumitroaia, F., Monah, C., Preoteasa, R., Munteanu and D. Nicola. 2003. Poduri – Dealul Ghindaru. In O Troie în Subcarpaţii Moldovei, ed. P. Neamţ. Ctin. Matasă.

    Google Scholar 

  • Мовша, Т.Г. 1971. Святилища трипольской культуры. Совeтская архeология 1:201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Пассeк, Т.С. 1940. Трипaльська культура. Київ: Bидавництво Акадeмaї Наук УРСР.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picazo, M. 1997. Hearth and the home: the timing of maintenance activities. In Invisible people and processes: writing women and children into European archaeology, eds. J. Moore and E. Scott, 59–67. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovici, D. 2010. Copper Age traditions north of the Danube river. In The lost world of Old Europe. The Danube valley, 5000–3500 BC., eds. D.W. Anthony and J.Y. Chi, 91–111. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Шмаглий, Н.М. and М.Ю. Bидeйко. 1987. Святилища и культовыe мeста на крупных трипольских посeлeниях. Рeлигиозныe прeдставлeния в пeрвобытном общeствe. Тeз. докл. конф. Москва.

    Google Scholar 

  • Шмаглий, Н.М. and М.Ю. Bидeйко. 2002/2003. Майданeцкоe – трипольский протогород. Stratum plus 2:44–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumova, V. 2005. Dwelling complexes of the Tripolyan settlement of Vasylievka and its place among Middle Dniester settlements. In Cucuteni. 120 years of research – time to sum up, eds. Gh. Dumitroaia, J. Chapman, O. Weller, C. Preoteasa, R. Munteanu, D. Nicola and D. Monah, 221–230. Piatra Neamţ: Neamţ County Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souvatzi, S. 2008. A social archaeology of households in Neolithic Greece. An anthropological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović, M. 1997. The age of clay: the social dynamics of house destruction. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16:334–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tringham, R. 2004. Weaving house life and house death into places: a blueprint for a hypermedia narrative. In Unsettling the Neolithic, eds. D. Bailey, A. Whittle and V. Cummings, 98–111. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tringham, R. and D. Krstić. 1990. Conclusion: Selevac in the wider context of European prehistory. In Selevac. A Neolithic village in Yugoslavia, eds. R. Tringham and D. Krstić, 567–617. UCLA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Цвeк, О.B. 1993. Рeлaгaйнa уявлeння насeлeння Трипaлля. Архeологaя 3:74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsvek, E.V. 2005. On the problem of distinguishing between manufacturing cults among Tripolyan populations. In Cucuteni. 120 years of research – time to sum up, eds. Gh. Dumitroaia, J. Chapman, O. Weller, C. Preoteasa, R. Munteanu, D. Nicola and D. Monah, 145–156. Piatra Neamţ: Neamţ County Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsvek, E.V. and Yu.Ya. Rassamakin. 2005. The interactions between the Eastern Tripolye culture and the Pontic steppe zone: some aspects of the problem. In Cucuteni. 120 years of research – time to sum up, eds. Gh. Dumitroaia, J. Chapman, O. Weller, C. Preoteasa, R. Munteanu, D. Nicola and D. Monah, 173–192. Piatra Neamţ: Neamţ County Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videiko, M. Yu. 2001. Tripolye and the cultures of central Europe: facts and character of interactions: 4200–2750 BC. Baltic-Pontic Studies 9:13–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biдeйко, М.Ю. 2004. Споруди трипaльської культури. In Eнциклопeдaя Трипaльської Цивaлaзацaї, Tom I, ed. M.Ю. Biдeйко, 315–341. Київ: Укрполaграфмeдaа.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biдeйко, М.Ю. 2005. Архaтeктура трипaльської культури VI–III тис. до н. E. In Давнa посeлeння України, eds. М.Ю. Biдeйко, P.B. Тeрпиловський and B.O. Пeтрашeнко, 9–80. Київ: Акадeмпeрaодика.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videiko, M. Yu. 2007a. Contours and contents of the ghost: Trypillia culture proto-cities. Memoria Antiquitatis 24:251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biдeйко, М.Ю. 2007b. Eтнaчнa аспeкти фeномeна Трипaлля-Кукутeнь. Матeрaали та дослaджeння з архeологaї Схaдної України (Луганськ) 7:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. 1988. The domestication of the human species. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, G. 1997. At home in the long Iron Age: A dialogue between households and individuals in cultural reproduction. In Invisible people and processes: writing women and children into European archaeology, eds. J. Moore and E. Scott, 68–74. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Зиньковский, К.B. 1976. О мeтодах изучeния домостроитeльства трипольской культуры. Матeриалы по архeологии Сeвeрного Причeрноморья (Одeсса) 8:36–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Daniela Hofmann and Jessica Smyth for their kind invitation to contribute a chapter to this book. We are grateful to Bisserka Gaydarska for her translation of Russian texts and for her positively critical comments on earlier drafts. JCC acknowledges the friendly co-operation of Dan Monah and Gheorghe Dumitroaia during his research visits to Piatra Neamţ and Iaşi. JCC is also grateful to the other authors for their warmth and hospitality during successive research visits to Kjiv and for their great co-operation during our joint field season at Nebelivka in 2009 and 2012. The authors are also grateful to the British Academy, the Society of Antiquaries of London, the Institute of Archaeology in Kjiv and Durham University for financial and logistical support for the first field season of the Tripolye mega-sites project at Nebelivka.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Burdo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burdo, N., Videiko, M., Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B. (2013). Houses in the Archaeology of the Tripillia—Cucuteni Groups. In: Hofmann, D., Smyth, J. (eds) Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe. One World Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5289-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics