Informed Consent

  • Domniţa Oana Bădărău


Medical profession’s deontology is aligned to human rights values through several principles that have been enforced in the twentieth century by international and national guidelines. Highly controversial research studies and shocking abuses of subjects during the WWII led to a shift from what had been until that time a paternalistic approach in medicine. Patient autonomy and research subjects’ right to be informed and to consent began to be the center of medical practice and research. Respect for persons entails that the patients have the right to act as autonomous agents and both physicians and researchers should encourage such actions. Nevertheless, informed consent issues arise in both the clinical and research settings when dealing with vulnerable populations, and with prospective research participants with different education levels, culture, and socioeconomic levels. At the core of providing legitimacy to research with human beings and making the distinction between medical intervention and battery or assault lies informed consent, a complex concept rather than a signed document.


Vulnerable Population Informed Consent Process Prospective Participant Signed Document Therapeutic Misconception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Suggested Readings

  1. Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., & Lidz, C. (1982). The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corneli, A. L., Sorenson, J. R., Bentley, M. E., Henderson, G. E., Bowling, M. J., Nkhoma, J., & van der Horst, C. (2011). Improving participant understanding of informed consent in an HIV-prevention clinical trial: A comparison of methods. AIDS Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9977-z.
  3. Housri, N., Coombs, M., Orandi, B. J., Pawlik, M., & Koniaris, L. G. (2011). Ethics and the law: Is there common ground on informed consent for disparities in hospital outcomes? Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(4), 260–264. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00010.Google Scholar
  4. Kass, N. E., Chaisson, L., Taylor, H. A., & Lohse, J. (2011). Length and Ccomplexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1778-6.
  5. Lurie, P., & Wolfe, S. M. (1997). Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(12), 853–856. doi: 10.1056/nejm199709183371212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moreno, J., Caplan, A. L., & Wolpe, P. R. (1998). Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on informed consent, human research ethics group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(22), 1951–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suggested Resources

  1. The Nuremberg Code. (1949). Washington D.C.: Reprinted by U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  2. World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Biomedical EthicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations