Abstract
Medical profession’s deontology is aligned to human rights values through several principles that have been enforced in the twentieth century by international and national guidelines. Highly controversial research studies and shocking abuses of subjects during the WWII led to a shift from what had been until that time a paternalistic approach in medicine. Patient autonomy and research subjects’ right to be informed and to consent began to be the center of medical practice and research. Respect for persons entails that the patients have the right to act as autonomous agents and both physicians and researchers should encourage such actions. Nevertheless, informed consent issues arise in both the clinical and research settings when dealing with vulnerable populations, and with prospective research participants with different education levels, culture, and socioeconomic levels. At the core of providing legitimacy to research with human beings and making the distinction between medical intervention and battery or assault lies informed consent, a complex concept rather than a signed document.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Readings
Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., & Lidz, C. (1982). The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 319–329.
Corneli, A. L., Sorenson, J. R., Bentley, M. E., Henderson, G. E., Bowling, M. J., Nkhoma, J., & van der Horst, C. (2011). Improving participant understanding of informed consent in an HIV-prevention clinical trial: A comparison of methods. AIDS Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-9977-z.
Housri, N., Coombs, M., Orandi, B. J., Pawlik, M., & Koniaris, L. G. (2011). Ethics and the law: Is there common ground on informed consent for disparities in hospital outcomes? Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(4), 260–264. doi:10.1059/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00010.
Kass, N. E., Chaisson, L., Taylor, H. A., & Lohse, J. (2011). Length and Ccomplexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1778-6.
Lurie, P., & Wolfe, S. M. (1997). Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(12), 853–856. doi:10.1056/nejm199709183371212.
Moreno, J., Caplan, A. L., & Wolpe, P. R. (1998). Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on informed consent, human research ethics group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(22), 1951–1958.
Suggested Resources
The Nuremberg Code. (1949). Washington D.C.: Reprinted by U.S. Government Printing Office.
World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bădărău, D.O. (2013). Informed Consent. In: Loue, S. (eds) Mental Health Practitioner's Guide to HIV/AIDS. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5283-6_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5283-6_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5282-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5283-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)