Skip to main content

Measures of Receptive Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals

Abstract

This chapter presents the data related to receptive language for the VL2 Psychometric Toolkit Project. The data were generated using multiple measures, including an experimental measure of American Sign Language skills, a measure of receptive fingerspelling skills, a visual measure of English phonology, the Koo Phoneme Detection Test, a measure of knowledge of English syntax, the Test of Syntactic Ability, and a measure of visual reception of spoken language, the Lipreading Screening Test (LST). The sample was comprised of deaf college students evaluated as part of the VL2 Psychometric Toolkit. In addition to providing descriptive statistics, correlations with a brief measure of nonverbal intelligence and measures of executive, visuospatial, memory, and other aspects of linguistic functioning and academic achievement administered concurrently as part of the VL2 Toolkit are presented. The relationships observed are discussed in the context of both research in the general population and, when available, previous research with deaf individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, A. T., & Bernstein, L. E. (2007). Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 5(5), 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. A. (1985). Phonological coding and shortterm memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 490–502. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90041-5 DOI:10.1016%2F0749-596X%2885%2990041-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, L. E. (2006). Visual speech perception. In E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, G. Bailly, & P. Perrier (Eds.), Audio-visual speech processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling (IARLD Monographs, No. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child. London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L., & Sweet, J. (1991). Fingerpoint-reading of memorized text: What enables beginners to process the print? Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 442–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmorey, K. (2002). The impact of sign language use on visuospatial cognition. In Language, cognition and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmorey, K., Klima, E., & Hickok, G. (1998). Mental rotation within linguistic and non-linguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition, 68(3), 221–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, B., Clark, D., Anderson, M., Gilbert, G., Musyoka, M., & Hauser, P. (2011). Deaf individuals’ bilingual abilites: American sign language proficiency, reading skills, and family characteristics. Psychology, 2(1), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1992). Rhyme, analogy, and children’s reading. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 49–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. (1989). Phonology and reading: Evidence from profoundly deaf readers. In D. Shankweiler & E. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 67–89). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V., & Fowler, C. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory and Cognition, 15, 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V., & Lichtenstein, E. (1990). Short-term memory by deaf signers: The primary language coding hypothesis reconsidered. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 211–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haptonstall-Nykaza, T. S., & Schick, B. (2007). The transition from fingerspelling to English print: Facilitating English decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(2), 172–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Moreno, C. (2006). Speech reading and learning to read: A comparison of 8-year-old profoundly deaf children with good and poor reading ability. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 189–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, P. C., Paludnevičiene, R., Supalla, T., & Bavelier, D. (2008). American Sign Language-Sentence Reproduction Test: Development and implications. In R. M. de Quadros (Ed.), Sign Language: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future (pp. 160–172). Petropolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2003a). Considerations for designing practice for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(2), 171–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2003b). The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 230–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, D., Crain, K., LaSasso, C., & Eden, G. (2008). Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 83–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaSasso, C., Crain, K., & Leybaert, J. (2003). Rhyme generation in deaf students: The effect of exposure to cued speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leybaert, J. (1993). Reading in the deaf: The roles of phonological codes. In M. Marcshark & M. Diane (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness (pp. 269–309). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, S. A. (1971). Modality and recall order interactions in short-term memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 294–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M. (2003). Cognitive functioning in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 464–477). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can’t hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 9–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In R. G. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference from the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S. P., Smith, N. L., & Wilbur, R. B. (1974). Comprehension of relativized sentences by deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 325–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S. P., Steinkamp, M. W., Power, D. J., & Jones, B. W. (1978). Test of syntactic abilities—A guide to administration and interpretation. Oregon: Dormac Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 325–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L., Fowler, C., & Fischer, F. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(5), 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valli, C., Lucas, C., & Mulrooney, K. J. (2005). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D., Campbell, R., Capek, C. M., Woll, B., David, A. S., McGuire, P. K., et al. (2007). Fingerspelling, signed language, text and picture processing in deaf native signers: The role of the mid-fusiform gyrus. NeuroImage, 35, 1287–1302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, L., Hickson, L., & Dodd, B. (2009). Review of visual speech perception by hearing and hearing-impaired people: Clinical implications. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(3), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna A. Morere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morere, D.A., Koo, D.S. (2012). Measures of Receptive Language. In: Morere, D., Allen, T. (eds) Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics