Skip to main content

A Multiple Correspondence Analysis Approach to the Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty in Morocco 2001–2007

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poverty and Social Exclusion around the Mediterranean Sea

Abstract

The measurement of multidimensional poverty has been advocated by most welfare scholars and is experiencing a growth in interest partly explained by controversial debates emerged across academics and practitioners. This chapter follows one of the least explored approaches—multiple correspondence analysis (MCA)—to assess multidimensional poverty in Morocco between 2001 and 2007. MCA provides two major advantages for the measurement of multidimensional poverty: it generates a matrix of “weights” based on the variance-covariance matrix of all welfare dimensions selected and provides a natural approach for constructing a composite welfare indicator that satisfies essential poverty orderings axioms. The application shows that poverty in Morocco has declined according to both monetary and multidimensional indicators and that these findings are robust to stochastic dominance tests. This chapter concludes that the sustained positive growth that Morocco experienced during the last decade has translated in improvements in living conditions well beyond monetary returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unlike previous studies, we refer to the composite indicator as ‘welfare’ rather than ‘poverty’ indicator. That is because the composite indicator applies to poor and non-poor and is therefore a ‘welfare’ indicator.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.omdh.hcp.ma/ for a number of poverty studies on Morocco conducted by the High Commission for the Plan.

  3. 3.

    Note that other criteria also used to select relevant variables such as the spread on the first axis, the high frequency of non-responses or low frequencies of responses on certain modalities.

References

  • Alkire, S. & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asselin, L. M. (2009). Analysis of multidimensional poverty: Theory and case-studies. Economic studies in inequality, social exclusion and well-being (Vol. 7). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., & Bourguignon, F. (1982). The comparison of multidimensioned distributions of economic status. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzécri, J-P. (1973). Analyse des Donnees (Vols. 1, 2). Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decancq, K. & Lugo, M. A. (2010). Weights in multidimensional indices of well-being: An overview, Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douidich M., Ezzrari A. & Soudi K. (2009). Dynamique de la pauvreté au Maroc: 1985–2007, Cahiers du plan N° 26, Haut Commissariat au Plan—Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D., & Younger, S. (2001). Robust multi-dimensional poverty comparisons. Economic Journal, 116(514), 943–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianisms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(1977), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E. (1986). The measurement and decomposition of multidimensional inequality. Econometrica, 54, 771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njong, A. M. & Dschang, P. N. (2008). Characterising weights in the measurement of multidimensional poverty: An application of data-driven approaches to Cameroonian data. OPHI Working Paper No. 21, wired at www.ophi.org.uk 1.

  • Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Florent Bresson and Valérie Bérenger for very useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Verme .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ezzrari, A., Verme, P. (2013). A Multiple Correspondence Analysis Approach to the Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty in Morocco 2001–2007. In: Berenger, V., Bresson, F. (eds) Poverty and Social Exclusion around the Mediterranean Sea. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5263-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics