Inflation Convergence in Europe

  • Bettina Becker
  • Stephen G. Hall
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM, volume 28)


Convergence has been a popular theme in applied economics since the seminal papers of Barro (1991) and Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992). The very notion of convergence quickly becomes problematic from an academic viewpoint however when we try and formalise a framework to think about these issues. In the light of the abundance of available convergence concepts, it would be useful to have a more universal framework that encompassed existing concepts as special cases. Moreover, much of the convergence literature has treated the issue as a zero-one outcome. We argue that it is more sensible and useful for policy decision makers and academic researchers to consider also ongoing convergence over time. Assessing the progress of ongoing convergence is one interesting and important means of evaluating whether the Eastern European New Member Countries (NMC) of the European Union (EU) are getting closer to being deemed “ready” to join the European Monetary Union (EMU), that is, fulfilling the Maastricht convergence criteria.


European Union Euro Area Inflation Rate European Monetary Union Candidate Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson TW (1963) The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika 28:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quart J Econ 106:407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker B, Hall SG (2009) A new look at economic convergence in Europe: a common factor approach. Int J Finance Econ 14:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geweke J (1977) The dynamic factor analysis of economic time series models. Chapter 19. In: Aigner D, Goldberger A (eds) Latent variables in socioeconomic models. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 365–383Google Scholar
  6. Hall SG, Robertson D, Wickens MR (1997) Measuring economic convergence. Int J Finance Econ 2:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nitsch V (2004) Have a break, have a … national currency: when do monetary unions fall apart? CESifo Working Paper No. 1113Google Scholar
  8. Wold H (1938) A study in the analysis of stationary time series, 2nd edn. Amquist and Wicksell, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations