Skip to main content

Quantitative Risk/Benefit Assessment: Where Are We?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Fourth Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics: Clinical Trials

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNSP,volume 1205))

Abstract

Pharmaceutical sponsors use a variety of approaches to make important benefit/risk decisions about their products internally. Benefit/risk assessment is equally important when regulators evaluate a product for marketing approval and payers evaluate it for reimbursement decision. Once a product receives marketing authorization, it is critical to communicate pertinent benefit and risk information to patients and health-care providers. All of the above can be made easier by the use of a common framework. In this paper, we review where we are in benefit/risk assessment. This includes endeavors by academic institutions, regulators, and the pharmaceutical industry. Despite concerns about quantitative benefit/risk assessment expressed by some, we argue that without a way to quantitatively incorporate the relative importance of factors impacting benefit/risk assessment, it will be hard to bring transparent decisions to questions such as “does the benefit of this product outweigh the risk.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Honig PK (2011) Comparative effectiveness: the fourth hurdle in drug development and a role for clinical pharmacology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(2):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A (1989) A quality of-life oriented endpoint for comparing treatments. Biometrics 45:781–795

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD (1990) Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 9:1259–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes DA, Bayoumi AM, Pirmohamed M (2007) Current assessment of risk-benefit by regulators: is it time to introduce decision analyses? Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Irish W, Sherrill B, Cole B, Gard C, Gledenning GA, Mouridsen H (2005) Quality-adjusted survival in a crossover trial of letrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 10:1458–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuang-Stein C (1994) A new proposal for benefit-less-risk analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 15:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ouellet D, Werth J, Parekh N, Feltner D, McCarthy B, Lalonde RL (2009) The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chuang-Stein C, Mohberg NR, Sinkula M (1991) Three measures for simultaneously evaluating benefits and risks using a categorical data from clinical trials. Stat Med 10:1349–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Entsuah R, Gorman JM (2002) Global benefit-risk assessment of antidepressants: venlafaxine XR and fluoxetine. J Psychiatr Res 36:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Entsuah R, Gao B (2002) Global benefit-risk evaluation of antidepressant action: comparison of pooled data for venlafaxine, SSRIs and placebo. CNS Spectr 7:882–888

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pritchett Y, Tamura R (2008) The application of global benefit-risk assessment in clinical trial design and some statistical considerations. Pharm Stat 7:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Norton J (2010) A longitudinal model for medical benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Presented at the 19th Annual International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, June 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norton J (2011) A longitudinal model and graphic for benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Drug Inf J 45:741–747

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coplan PM, Noel RA, Levitan BS, Fergun J, Mussen F (2011) Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:312–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levitan BS, Andrews EB, Gilsenan A, Ferguson J, Noel RA, Coplan PM, Mussen F (2011) Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S2–S15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 2: the practical application of a new model. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S16–S41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Temple R (2007) Quantitative decision analysis: a work in progress. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chuang-Stein C, Entsuah R, Pritchett Y (2008) Measures for conducting comparative benefit:risk assessment. Drug Inf J 42:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Neill R (2008) A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more? Drug Inf J 42:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoerl RW, Snee RD (2010) Statistical engineering: an idea whose time has come? A discussion in honor of Gerry Hahn’s 80th birthday. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver British Columbia, August 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer JM (2009) Balancing the benefits and risks of inhaled long-acting beta-agonists – the influence of values. N Engl J Med 360:1592–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM (2007) TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author wants to thank Jon Norton for the use of Fig. 2. The author also wants to thank PhRMA BRAT, especially Bennett Levitan, Paul Coplan, Rebecca Noel, Marilyn Metcalf, and Diana Hughes, for BRAT-generated materials. In addition, the author wants to thank Leila Zelnick and Tom Fleming for their comments which have helped improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy Chuang-Stein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chuang-Stein, C. (2013). Quantitative Risk/Benefit Assessment: Where Are We?. In: Fleming, T., Weir, B. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics: Clinical Trials. Lecture Notes in Statistics(), vol 1205. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5245-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics