Abstract
The use of group sequential methodology has become widespread in the conduct of clinic trials. As each clinical trial presents unique scientific, statistical, and logistical constraints, it is important to carefully evaluate candidate group sequential designs to ensure desirable operating characteristics. At the implementation stage of a clinical trial design it is also essential to account for deviations from original design specifications in order to control operating characteristics such as type I and II error rates. These changes might include the number and/or timing of analyses as well as deviations from the originally assumed variability of outcome measures. Due to the computational complexity involved in evaluating, monitoring, and analyzing a group sequential procedure, specialized software is required. In this manuscript we demonstrate how the RCTdesign package (http://www.rctdesign.org) in R can be used to select, implement, and analyze a group sequential stopping rule. Throughout, we illustrate trial design and monitoring in the context of a group sequential survival trial of an experimental monoclonal antibody in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boyd A, Kittelson J, Gillen D (2012) Estimation of treatment effect under nonproportional hazards and covariate dependent censoring. Stat Med [Epub ahead of print]
Brummel S, Gillen D (2012) Flexibly monitoring group sequential survival trials using constrained boundaries. Revised for Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Burington BE, Emerson SS (2003) Flexible implementations of group sequential stopping rules using constrained boundaries. Biometrics 59:770–777
Cytel Software Corporation (2000) EaSt. A software package for the design and interim monitoring of group-sequential clinical trials. Cambridge, Mass
Emerson SS (2006) Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs. Stat Med 25:3270–3296
Emerson SS, Fleming TR (1989) Symmetric group sequential test designs. Biometrics 45: 905–923
Emerson SS, Fleming TR (1990) Parameter estimation following group sequential hypothesis testing. Biometrika 77:875–892
Emerson SS, Kittelson JM, Gillen DL (2007) Bayesian evaluation of group sequential designs. Stat Med 26:1431–1449
Emerson SS, Kittelson JM, Gillen DL (2007) Frequentist evaluation of group sequential designs. Stat Med 26:5047–5080
Fisher LD (1998) Self-designing clinical trials. Stat Med 17:1551–1562
Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York
Gillen DL (2009) A random walk approach for quantifying uncertainty in group sequential survival trials. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(3):603–620
Gillen DL, Emerson SS (2005) Information growth in a family of weighted logrank statistics under repeated analysis. Seq Anal 24(1):1–22
Gillen DL, Emerson SS (2005) A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards. Biometrics 61(2):546–551
Gillen DL, Emerson SS (2007) Non-transitivity in a class of weighted logrank statistics under non-proportional hazards. Stat Probab Lett 77(2):123–130
Gillen DL, Emerson SS (2011) Evaluating a group sequential design in the setting of non-proportional hazards UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 307. http://biostats.bepress.com/uwbiostat/paper307
Kittelson JM, Emerson SS (1999) A unifying family of group sequential test designs. Biometrics 55:874–882
Lan KKG, DeMets DL (1983) Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 70:659–663
Liu A, Hall WJ (1999) Unbiased estimation following a group sequential test. Biometrika 86:71–78
Nguyen V, Gillen D (2012) Robust inference in semiparametric discrete hazard models for observational studies. Revised for Journal of the American Statistical Association
Nguyen V, Gillen D (2012) Robust inference in semiparametric discrete hazard models for randomized clinical trials. Lifetime Data Anal 18:446–69
O’Brien PC, Fleming TR (1979) A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35:549–556
Pampallona S, Tsiatis A, Kim K (1995) Spending functions for the type i and type ii error probabilities of group sequential tests. Technical report. http://76.12.5.166/papers/usefun.pdf
PEST (2000) Planning and evaluation of sequential trials. The MPS Research Unit, The University of Reading, Reading
Pocock SJ (1977) Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Biometrika 64:191–200
Proschan MA, Hunsberger SA (1995) Designed extension of studies based on conditional power. Biometrics 51:1315–1324
SAS Institute Inc (2005) SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3, SAS/SEQDESIGN, Cary, NC
TIBCO Software Inc (2000) S-Plus SeqTrial. Palo Alto, Ca
Struthers CA, Kalbfleisch JD (1986) Misspecified proportional hazard models. Biometrika 73:363–369
Tsiatis AA, Mehta CR (2003) On the inefficiency of the adaptive design for monitoring clinical trials. Biometrika 90:367–378
Tsiatis AA, Rosner GL, Mehta CR (1984) Exact confidence intervals following a group sequential test. Biometrics 40:797–803
Wang SK, Tsiatis AA (1987) Approximately optimal one-parameter boundaries for group sequential trials. Biometrics 43:193–199
Whitehead J (1986) On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test. Biometrika 73:573–581
Whitehead J (1986) Supplementary analysis at the conclusion of a sequential clinical trial. Biometrics 42:461–471
Whitehead J (1997) The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. Wiley, New York
Whitehead J, Stratton I (1983) Group sequential clinical trials with triangular continuation regions. Biometrics 39:227–236 (corr: V39 p1137)
Xu R, O’Quigley J (2000) Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. Biostatistics (Oxford) 1(4):423–439
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gillen, D.L., Emerson, S.S. (2013). Designing, Monitoring, and Analyzing Group Sequential Clinical Trials Using the RCTdesign Package for R. In: Fleming, T., Weir, B. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics: Clinical Trials. Lecture Notes in Statistics(), vol 1205. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5245-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5245-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5244-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5245-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)