Advertisement

The Future of Scholarship in Management, Spirituality, and Religion: Diversity and the Creative Nexus

  • Donald W. McCormick
Chapter

Abstract

The future of the field of management, spirituality, and religion (MSR) is promising. Two trends drive changes in the field that are over the horizon: increased diversity in the academy and greater interaction between MSR and other fields and disciplines. As the academy becomes more diverse, the field of management, spirituality, and religion will become less culturally, religiously, and ethnically biased. Currently, there is a bias toward the spiritual and religious interests of those of us who teach and publish about MSR, and most of us are liberal, upper middle class, American whites. As a result, the topics examined in the field of MSR do not reflect the range of spiritual and religious interests of people in the USA as a whole, much less the world. This chapter explores this growing diversity and also offers examples from the intersection of MSR with fields and topics such as human resources, motivation, and most importantly—business ethics, as well as the intersection with disciplines outside of business.

Keywords

Business Ethic Harvard Business Review Workplace Spirituality Spiritual Development Transcendental Meditation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barton, B. (1925). The Man nobody knows: A discovery of Jesus. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  2. Boorstin, D. J. (1965). The Americans: The national experience. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bursk, E. C. (1959). Business and religion: A new depth dimension in management (1st ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1967, February 23). The responsibility of intellectuals. The New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
  5. Fry, L. W. (2005). Toward a Paradigm of Spiritual Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 619–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunter, J., & McCormick, D. W. (2008). Mindfulness in the workplace: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim CA, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. McCormick, D. W. (2006). Indoctrination, Diversity, and Teaching About Spirituality and Religion in the Workplace. Organization and Management Journal: A Refereed Online Publication Sponsored by the Eastern Academy of Management, 3(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
  9. Mitroff, I. I. (2003). Do not promote religion under the guise of spirituality. Organization, 10(2), 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Skolnick, A. A. (1991a). Maharishi Ayur-Veda: Guru’s Marketing Scheme Promises the World Eternal ‘Perfect Health’. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(13), 1741–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Skolnick, A. A. (1991b, Fall). The Maharishi Caper: Or How to Hoodwink Top Medical Journals. ScienceWriters: The Newsletter of the National Association of Science Writers.Google Scholar
  12. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementCollege of Business and EconomicsNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations