Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oral Cytology
  • 1262 Accesses

Abstract

Currently, the most effective way to control oral cancer is to combine early diagnosis and timely as well as appropriate treatment. Precancerous and cancerous oral lesions may mimic number of benign oral conditions appearing as a white or red spot. Until now, tissue harvesting by scalpel biopsy and subsequent histological examination have been the gold standard for diagnosing premalignant and malignant oral diseases. Identifying additional diagnostic tools would be welcome to improve analysis of any suspicious lesion. The basic requirements for a useful diagnostic technique include the following: easy to use, causes minimal patient discomfort, and collects sufficient material. Ideally, a diagnostic procedure should be neither time-consuming nor complicated and, in addition to high sensitivity, should have the potential for automation. The oral cytology technique is simple, nonaggressive, relatively painless, tolerated well by patients and optimally meets all of these requirements, particularly when it is supplemented by various adjunctive methods like image analysis and molecular probes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2012. 2012. http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/OralCavityandOropharyngealCancer/DetailedGuide/oral-cavity-and-oropharyngeal-cancer-key-statistics. Accessed 1 Mar 2012.

  2. Mehrotra R, Pandya S, Chaudhary AK, Kumar M, Singh M. Prevalence of oral premalignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:263–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson PJ, Hamadah O. Cancerisation within the oral cavity: the use of ‘field mapping biopsies’ in clinical management. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:20–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson NW. Orofacial neoplasms: global epidemiology, risk factors and recommendations for research. Int Dent J. 1991;41:365–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pindborg JJ, Reichart PA, Smith CJ, Van Der Waal I. Histological typing of cancer and precancer of the oral mucosa. World Health Organisation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1997. p. 21–314.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warnakulasuriya S, Reibel J, Bouquot D, Dabelsteen E. Oral epithelial dysplasia classification systems: predictive value, utility, weaknesses and scope for improvement. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kujan O, Khattab A, Oliver RJ, Roberts SA, Thakker N, Sloan P. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JJ, Hung HC, Cheng SJ, et al. Factors associated with underdiagnosis from incisional biopsy of oral leukoplakic lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmstrup P, Vedtofte P, Reibel J, Stoltze K. Oral premalignant lesions: is a biopsy reliable? J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:262–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Driemel O, Kunkel M, Hullmann M, et al. Diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions. J German Soc Derm. 2007;5:1095–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moralis A, Kunkel M, Reichert TE, Kosmehl H, Driemel O. Identification of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma by brush cytology. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2007;11:355–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Mehrotra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mehrotra, R. (2013). Introduction. In: Mehrotra, R. (eds) Oral Cytology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5221-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5221-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5220-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5221-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics