Skip to main content

Curbing Corruption and Enhancing Trust in Government: Some Lessons from Singapore and Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Asian Criminology

Abstract

Corruption is a serious problem in many Asian countries according to Transparency International’s 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). However, unlike other Asian countries, Singapore and Hong Kong SAR have succeeded in minimizing corruption as reflected in their top two ranking among Asian countries on the 2010 CPI. This chapter has two aims. First, it analyzes the causes of the high level of corruption and low level of public trust of politicians in Asian countries. Second, it contends that Singapore and Hong Kong SAR have a low level of corruption and a high level of public trust of politicians because of their highly effective governments, which are the combined result of their favorable policy contexts, their reliance on meritocracy in selecting and promoting talented civil servants, their reliance on competitive salaries to attract and retain them, and their effective control of corruption. The chapter concludes that other Asian countries can enhance their citizens’ trust in their governments by improving their levels of government effectiveness by learning these four lessons from the experiences of Singapore and Hong Kong SAR: adopting meritocracy, paying competitive salaries to attract and retain the “best and brightest” citizens in the civil service, and curbing corruption effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, N., & Brookins, O. T. (2004). On corruption and countervailing actions in three South Asian nations. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 7(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beschel, R. P., Jr. (1999). Corruption, transparency and accountability in the Philippines. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaars, G. E. (1973). Public services. In Towards tomorrow: Essays on development and social transformation in Singapore (pp. 73–83). Singapore: National Trades Union Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunei Times. (2006, October 17). Cambodia: Hun Sen says critics ‘misunderstand’ anti-corruption bill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. P. (2004). Government capacity and the Hong Kong Civil Service. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. (2003, January 8). Public service must change with the times. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A. B. L. (2007). Combating corruption as a political strategy to rebuild trust and legitimacy: Can China learn from Hong Kong? International Public Management Review, 8(2), 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, D. C. E. (1992). Civil service pay in South Asia. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. H. (1999, June 23). Regulatory reform in Korea. Seoul: unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Y. T., & Rimban, L. (1998). Gatekeeper. In S. S. Coronel (Ed.), Pork and other Perks: Corruption and governance in the Philippines (pp. 150–185). Pasig: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, P. K. (Ed.). (2003). The global competitiveness report 2002–2003. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPIB (Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau). (2003). Swift and sure action: Four decades of anti-corruption work. Singapore: CPIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. K. (2001). Public office, private interest: Bureaucracy and corruption in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistics. (2010). Yearbook of statistics, Singapore 2010. Singapore: Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2010). Pocket world in figures (2011th ed.). London: Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S., & Seng, T. C. (2007). Corruption in the Judiciary of Cambodia. In D. Rodriguez & L. Ehrichs (Eds.), Global corruption report 2007 (pp. 183–186). Cambridge: Transparency International and Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Information Bureau. (2010). Macao yearbook 2009. Macao: Government Information Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadisumarto, D. (1974). The Indonesian Civil Service and its reform movements. D.P.A. dissertation, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, L M. (2008, May 28). Where is Cambodia’s anti-corruption law? UPI Asia Online. See http://www.upiasia.com/Human_Rights/2008/05/27/where_is_cambodias_anti-corruption_law/2456/?view=print

  • Hussain, Z. (2009, June 5). PERC: Recession could test Singapore’s civil service. Straits Times, p. C5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAC. (Independent Commission Against Corruption). (2009). 2008 Annual report. Hong Kong: ICAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Service Department. (2009). Hong Kong 2008. Hong Kong: Information Service Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Services Department. (2010). Hong Kong 2009. Hong Kong: Information Services Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, J. S., & Kim, T. Y. (2002). Distrust as a hindrance to democratic governance in South Korea. Asian Journal of Political Science, 10(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, M. R. (2007). Bangladesh Public Service Commission: A diagnostic study. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. M. (1998). Administrative reforms in Bangladesh. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (1997). Regulation and corruption. In Y. H. Cho & H. G. Frederickson (Eds.), The White House and the Blue House: Government reform in the United States and Korea (Chapter 12, pp. 253–269). Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiadi, J. (2001). Indonesia: Redefining military professionalism. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Military professionalism in Asia: Conceptual and empirical perspectives (Chapter 7, pp. 93–110). Honolulu: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, H. C. (1981). Anti-Corruption legislation in Hong Kong—A history. In R. P. L. Lee (Ed.), Corruption and its control in Hong Kong: Situation up to the late seventies (Chapter 1, pp. 15–43). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, A. N. (2001). Keeping Hong Kong clean: Experiences of fighting corruption post 1997. Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 5(2), 51–54. Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, B. C. (2004). Bureaucracy and red tape: A comparison between public and private construction project organizations in Hong Kong. B.Sc. dissertation, Department of Real Estate and Construction, University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. (2006, March 5). Breaking the red tape. ComputerWorld Canada. Available at http://www.itworldcanada.com/ViewArticle.aspx?=breaking-the-red-tape

  • Lam, W. M. & Kuan, H. C. (2008). Democratic transition frustrated: The case of Hong Kong. In Y. H. Chu, L. Diamond, A. J. Nathan, & D. C. Shin (Eds.), How East Asians view democracy (Chapter 8, pp. 187–208). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. Y. (2000). From third world to first, the Singapore story: 1965–2000. Singapore: Times Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. O. M. (2003). Hong Kong—Institutional inheritance from Colony to Special Administrative Region. In C. Hood & B. G. Peters with Grace O. M. Lee (Eds.), Reward for high public office: Asian and Pacific Rim states (Chapter 8, pp. 130–144). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. (2006). National integrity systems Transparency International country study report Cambodia 2006. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, S. (1995). Developing Mongolia’s legal framework: A needs analysis. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. Y. (2001). The utilization of the internet technology in the public services of Korea. Asian Review of Public Administration, 13(1), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, S. (2009, November 5). KPK scandal captivates Indonesians: Wide media coverage fuelling anger over alleged plot against graft busters. Straits Times, p. A9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, P. L. (1995). Low salary grades, income-segmentation schemes and the merit principle. In P. D. Tapales & N. N. Pilar (Eds.), Public administration by the year 2000: Looking back into the future (pp. 186–214). Quezon City: College of Public Administration, University of the Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmier, L. (1985). The control of bureaucratic corruption: Case studies in Asia. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for Governance Reform in Indonesia. (2001). A National survey of corruption in Indonesia: Final Report. Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., et al. (2000). The global competitiveness report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1978). Administrative and legal measures for combating bureaucratic corruption in Singapore. Singapore: Department of Political Science, University of Singapore. Occasional Paper No. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1979). Police corruption in Singapore: An analysis of its forms, extent and causes. Singapore Police Journal, 10(1), 7–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1982). The public bureaucracy and national development in Singapore. In Tummala, K. K. (Ed.), Administrative systems abroad. Revised edition (Chapter 4, pp. 42–75). Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1984). The public bureaucracy in Singapore, 1959–1984. In P. S. You & C. Y. Lim (Eds.), Singapore: Twenty-five years of development (pp. 288–314). Singapore: Nan Yang Xing Zhou Lianhe Zaobao.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1995a). Controlling corruption in city-states: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Singapore. Crime, Law and Social Change, 22, 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (1995b). Sustaining quality in the Singapore Civil Service. Public Administration and Development, 15(3), 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2003a). Curbing corruption in Asia: A comparative study of six countries. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2003b). Paying for the ‘best and brightest’: Rewards for high public office in Singapore. In C. Hood and B. G. Peters with G. O. M. Lee (Eds.), Reward for high public office: Asian and Pacific Rim states (Chapter 9, pp. 145–162). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2004). Best practices for curbing corruption in Asia. The Governance Brief, 11, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2006). Curbing Asian corruption: An impossible dream? Current History, 105(690), 176–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2007a). Combating corruption Singapore-style: Lessons for other Asian countries. Baltimore: School of Law, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2007b). National integrity systems Transparency International regional overview report: East and Southeast Asia 2006. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2007c). Administrative reform in Singapore: An evaluation of Public Service 21 (1995–2004). In D. Argyriades, O. P. Dwivedi & J. G. Jabbra (Eds.), Public administration in transition: Essays in honor of Gerald E. Caiden (Chapter 9, pp. 162–188). London: Vallentine Mitchell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2008). Curbing corruption in India: An impossible dream? Asian Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2010). Defying institutional failure: Learning from the experiences of anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries. Crime, Law and Social Change, 53, 23–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J. S. T. (2011). Curbing corruption in Asian countries: An impossible dream? Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Singapore. (1994, October 21). Competitive salaries for competent and honest government: Benchmarks for ministers and senior public officers. Command 13 of 1994, White Paper presented to the Parliament of Singapore. Singapore: Prime Minister’s office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (Ed.). (2004). The global competitiveness report 2003–2004. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (Ed.). (2009). The global competitiveness report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., & Porter, M. E. (2007). The global competitiveness report 2007–2008. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., Porter, M. E., Sachs, J. D., Cornelius, P. K., & McArthur, J. W. (2002). The global competitiveness report 2001–2002. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., Porter, M. E., Sachs, J. D., Warner, A. M., & Levinson, M. (1999). The global competitiveness report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. (2005). Public administration in Hong Kong: Regime change and its impact on the public sector. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seah, C. M. (1971). Bureaucratic evolution and political change in an emerging nation: A case study of Singapore. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, Victoria University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahan, A. (2007). Recruitment and selection process in Bangladesh Civil Service: A critical overview. Bloomington: Digital Library of the Commons Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siagian, S. P. (1970). Improving Indonesia’s administrative infrastructure: A case study. In H. B. Lee & A. G. Samonte (Eds.), Administrative reforms in Asia (Chapter 5, pp. 95–124). Manila: Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinker, A. P. (1953). What are public service commissions for? Public Administration (London), 31(Autumn), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh K. H. (2008, June 9–11). Role of awareness and education in the fight against Corruption. Paper presented at the Asia Anti-Corruption Conference in Qatar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straits Times. (1993, December 4). p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straits Times. (1996, April 9). p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straits Times. (2002, June 5). Police chief admits: Yes, Thai cops are corrupt, what do you expect? p. A5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1993). The special problems of small countries. World Development, 21(2), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunday Times. (1982a, February 21). p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunday Times. (1982b, February 28). p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. L. (1999). The experience of Singapore in combating corruption. In R. Stapenhurst & S. J. Kpundeh (Eds.), Curbing corruption: Toward a model for building national integrity (Chapter 4, pp. 59–66). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E. S., & Wang, Z. (2007). Singapore country report: Second wave of Asian Barometer Survey. Taipei: Asian Barometer Project Office, National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica. Working Paper Series No. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thampi, G. K. (2002). Corruption in South Asia: Insights and benchmarks from citizen feedback surveys in five countries. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (1999). Fighting corruption to improve governance. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. W. P. (2004, August 3). Hong Kong Civil Service continues to impress. Hong Kong: Civil Service Bureau. http://www.csb.gov.hk/english/letter/1691.html

  • World Bank. (2006). Doing business 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2007). Doing business 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Doing business 2009. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Doing business 2010. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Doing business 2011. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, J. S. L., & Leong, J. L. K. (2003). Digital 21 and Hong Kong’s advancement in e-government. In J. S. L. Yong (Ed.), E-Government in Asia: Enabling public service innovation in the 21st Century (Chapter 5, pp. 97–116). Singapore: Times Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon S. T. Quah Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quah, J.S.T. (2013). Curbing Corruption and Enhancing Trust in Government: Some Lessons from Singapore and Hong Kong. In: Liu, J., Hebenton, B., Jou, S. (eds) Handbook of Asian Criminology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5218-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics