Skip to main content

The Origin of Freedom in Animal Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Is Science Compatible with Free Will?

Abstract

Behaviour of humans and most animals can be free. Behaviour is free if the subject does of her/his own accord what must be done. Action selection is the main task of a brain. The search for the right behaviour is demanding because it requires assessing the possible consequences of the available behavioural options. Freedom is reduced externally, if fewer adaptive behavioural options are available or internally, if the search process in the brain is impaired. Most animal societies enforce cooperation at the expense of individual freedom. In contrast, human societies can base cooperation on shared intentions. In this way the individuals can cooperate without sacrificing behavioural freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, J. (1975). Chemotaxis in Bacteria. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 44, 341–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W., & Haglund, K. (1994). The Landmark Interviews. Bringing behavioural genes to light. Journal of NIH Research, 6, 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W. (2005). Indeterminacy in Brain and Behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 25–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Marin, A., Stephens, G. J., & Louis, M. (2011). Active sampling and decision making in Drosophila chemotaxis. Nature Communications, 2, 441 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms 1455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M. (1983). Initiale Aktivität und Willkürverhalten bei Tieren. Naturwissenschaften, 70, 70–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M. (1994). Voluntariness (Willkürfähigkeit) and the general organization of behaviour. In: Flexibility and Constraint in Behavioral Systems, (R.J. Greenspan & C.P. Kyriacou, eds.) pp147-156, Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M. & Wolf, R. (1984). Vision in Drosophila. Studies of Brain Function Vol. XII V. Braitenberg, Ed., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., Wolf, R., & Brembs, B. (2001). Flexibility in a single behavioural variable of Drosophila. Learning & Memory, 8, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, A.V.M. (2007). Neuronaler Determinismus: Nur eine Illusion? In: Naturgeschichte der Freiheit (ed. J.-C. Heilinger) pp35-42, Berlin New York, Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Akademie-Ausgabe Bd. IV, p338, Berlin 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1965). Über tierisches und menschliches Verhalten, Vol. 2 (e.g. pp.210-211) Munich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R., Faure, P., & Ernst, R. (2001). The power law distribution for walking-time intervals correlates with the ellipsoid body in Drosophila. Journal of Neurogenetics, 15, 205–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matijevic, J. (1998). The pathfinder mission of Mars: Autonomous Navigation and the Sojourner Microrover. Science, 280, 454–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maye, A., Hsieh, C. H., Sugihara, G., & Brembs, B. (2007). Order in spontaneous behaviour. PLoS ONE, 2, e443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. (2004). Das Problem der Willensfreiheit aus Sicht der Hirnforschung. In: Debatte, Heft 1, pp83-92, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, C. S. (1919). Mammalian physiology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W. (2006). Neurobiologische Anmerkungen zum Freiheitsdiskurs. In: Debatte, Heft 3, pp17-26, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G. M., Afanasyev, V., Buldyrev, S. V., Murphy, E. J., Prince, P. A., & Stanley, H. E. (1996). Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature, 381, 413–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, G. M., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M. G. E., Raposo, E. P., & Stanley, H. E. (1999). Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature, 401, 911–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D.M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R., & Heisenberg, M. (1991). Basic organization of operant behaviour as revealed in Drosophila flight orientation. Journal of Comparative Physiology (A), 169, 699–705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Heisenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heisenberg, M. (2013). The Origin of Freedom in Animal Behaviour. In: Suarez, A., Adams, P. (eds) Is Science Compatible with Free Will?. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5212-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics