Skip to main content

Bone Sarcoma Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bone Sarcoma

Chapter Overview

Imaging studies are invaluable in the diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of response to treatment of bone sarcomas. At MD Anderson Cancer Center, the most essential initial imaging studies performed for diagnosis and staging are plain film radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. To answer specific questions, these studies are often augmented by other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), skeletal scintigraphy, positron emission tomography (PET) with fused CT (PET/CT), and ultrasonography. After treatment, plain radiography, MRI, and PET/CT may be used to evaluate tumor response. One ­cannot overemphasize the importance of these modalities in the comprehensive evaluation of patients with bone sarcomas. Accurate characterization of the primary lesion is key to the diagnosis, while precise identification of local, regional, and distant disease is critical to staging and treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Readings

  • Aisen AM, Martel W, Braunstein EM, et al. MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft-­tissue tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:749–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choyke PL, Dwyer AJ, Knopp MV. Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:509–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costelloe CM, Macapinlac HA, Madewell JE, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(204):9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, et al. A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1655–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LC. A general theory of bone tumors. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1953;29:164–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser Jr RP, et al. Soft-tissue masses: diagnosis using MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:541–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodwick GS, Wilson AJ, Farrell C, et al. Determining growth rates of focal lesions of bone from radiographs. Radiology. 1980;134:577–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part I: internal margins. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:715–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison WB, Dalinka MK, Daffner RH. Bone tumors. ACR appropriateness criteria. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2005. p. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy Jr WA. Imaging bone tumors in the 1990s. Cancer. 1991;67:1169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomikos GC, Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ, et al. Primary bone tumors of the lower extremities. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:971–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oudenhoven LF, Dhondt E, Kahn S, et al. Accuracy of radiography in grading and tissue-specific diagnosis—a study of 200 consecutive bone tumors of the hand. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:78–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor physiology. Methods Mol Med. 2005;124:279–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale BD, Madewell JE, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part II: periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:749–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacy GS, Mahal RS, Peabody TD. Staging of bone tumors: a review with illustrative examples. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:967–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet DE, Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part III: matrix patterns. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:785–814.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tehranzadeh J, Mnaymneh W, Ghavam C, et al. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989;13:466–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl M, Saueressig U, van Buiren M, et al. Osteosarcoma: preliminary results of in vivo assessment of tumor necrosis after chemotherapy with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:618–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Madewell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madewell, J.E., Costelloe, C.M., Haygood, T.M., Kumar, R., Murphy, W.A. (2013). Bone Sarcoma Imaging. In: Lin, P., Patel, S. (eds) Bone Sarcoma. MD Anderson Cancer Care Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5194-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5194-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5193-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5194-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics