Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Chapter

Abstract

The history of pediatric liver transplantation started with the first unsuccessful liver transplantation in 1963. In the late 1960s, eight pediatric patients survived the initial transplantation, only to face difficulties with immunosuppression. The introduction of cyclosporine A in 1978 made acceptable long-term survival rates possible [1], and liver transplantation became standard of care in the 1980s for liver failure and end-stage liver disease. The resulting shortage of organs for small children triggered surgical innovations in the late 1980s and early 1990s such as living-donor liver and split liver donations. The introduction of the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score in 2002 shifted wait-list priority for organ allocation from time on the waiting list to the severity of the disease. This evolution over almost 50 years leads to today’s excellent long-term outcome after pediatric liver transplantation with 1- and 5-year survival rates of 90 % and 85 %, respectively [2]. Problems related to lifelong immunosuppression and donor scarcity are remaining challenges.

Keywords

Liver Transplantation Inferior Vena Cava Hepatic Encephalopathy Biliary Atresia Fulminant Hepatic Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kamath BM, Olthoff KM. Liver transplantation in children: update 2010. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010;57:401–14. table of contents.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rook M, Rand E. Predictors of long-term outcome after liver transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman Jr RB, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:851–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Lindblad AS. Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;74:173–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McDiarmid SV, Merion RM, Dykstra DM, Harper AM. Selection of pediatric candidates under the PELD system. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:S23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourdeaux C, Tri TT, Gras J, et al. PELD score and posttransplant outcome in pediatric liver transplantation: a retrospective study of 100 recipients. Transplantation. 2005;79:1273–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Lindblad AS. Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation: 2002 update. An overview of demographics, indications, timing, and immunosuppressive practices in pediatric liver transplantation in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:284–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santos JL, Choquette M, Bezerra JA. Cholestatic liver disease in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010;12:30–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly DA, Davenport M. Current management of biliary atresia. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:1132–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nio M, Ohi R, Miyano T, Saeki M, Shiraki K, Tanaka K. Five- and 10-year survival rates after surgery for biliary atresia: a report from the Japanese Biliary Atresia Registry. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:997–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen K, Horslen S. Metabolic liver disease in children. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:391–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Treem WR. Liver transplantation for non-hepatotoxic inborn errors of metabolism. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8:215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosencrantz R, Schilsky M. Wilson disease: pathogenesis and clinical considerations in diagnosis and treatment. Semin Liver Dis. 2011;31:245–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Narkewicz MR, Dell Olio D, Karpen SJ, et al. Pattern of diagnostic evaluation for the causes of pediatric acute liver failure: an opportunity for quality improvement. J Pediatr. 2009;155:801–6. e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelly DA. Liver complications of pediatric parenteral nutrition–epidemiology. Nutrition. 1998;14:153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yudkowitz FS, Chietero M. Anesthetic issues in pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2005;9:666–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nery J, Jacque J, Weppler D, et al. Routine use of the piggyback technique in pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:1644–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray CP, Yoo SJ, Babyn PS. Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:614–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spada M, Riva S, Maggiore G, Cintorino D, Gridelli B. Pediatric liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:648–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Broering DC, Mueller L, Ganschow R, et al. Is there still a need for living-related liver transplantation in children? Ann Surg. 2001;234:713–21. discussion 21–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heffron TG, Emond JC, Whitington PF, et al. Biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. A comparison of reduced-size and whole grafts. Transplantation. 1992;53:391–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sieders E, Peeters PM, TenVergert EM, et al. Graft loss after pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2002;235:125–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ng VL, Fecteau A, Shepherd R, et al. Outcomes of 5-year survivors of pediatric liver transplantation: report on 461 children from a north american multicenter registry. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e1128–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bucuvalas J. Long-term outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009;15 Suppl 2:S6–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations