Skip to main content

Nanotechnology and the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Malignancies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology in Dermatology

Abstract

The application of nanotechnology to dermatology has opened new doors in the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous malignancies in the twenty-first century. Noninvasive diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies has traditionally been limited by the confines of what can be seen with visual inspection. Despite the availability of adjunctive tools, such as the dermatoscope, to increase accuracy in correct identification of lesions, skin biopsy with histopathologic confirmation is frequently necessary to ascertain a diagnosis. Thus, the possibility of imaging potentially malignant lesions noninvasively by coupling nanotechnology with various imaging techniques is very exciting. Much of this new technology still remains under investigation. This chapter will provide an overview of cutaneous malignancies, as well as an overview of the traditional methods and current developments in cutaneous imaging on the nanotechnology front.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim RH, Armstrong AW. Nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:125–39, ix

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146 Suppl 61:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstock MA, Bogaars HA, Ashley M, Litle V, Bilodeau E, Kimmel S. Nonmelanoma skin cancer mortality. A population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:1194–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Harris AR, et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:283–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuong W, Cheng LS, Armstrong AW. Melanoma: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30:113–24, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erickson C, Driscoll MS. Melanoma epidemic: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28:281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Linos E, Swetter SM, Cockburn MG, Colditz GA, Clarke CA. Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1666–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson JK, Rigel DS, Amonette RA. Trends in sun exposure knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: 1986 to 1996. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff K, Johnson RA. Cutaneous melanoma. In: Sydor AM, Englis MR, editors. Fitzpatrick’s color atlas & synopsis of clinical dermatology. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical; 2009. p. 308–27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malvehy J, Puig S. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Argenziano G, Ferrara G, Francione S, Di Nola K, Martino A, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopy–the ultimate tool for melanoma diagnosis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2009;28:142–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohsie SJ, Sarantopoulos GP, Cochran AJ, Binder SW. Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:433–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. El Tal AK, Abrou AE, Stiff MA, Mehregan DA. Immunostaining in Mohs micrographic surgery: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:275–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith L, Macneil S. State of the art in non-invasive imaging of cutaneous melanoma. Skin Res Technol. 2011. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00503.x.

  16. Monheit G, Cognetta AB, Ferris L, et al. The performance of MelaFind: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147:188–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zuo L, Wei W, Morris M, Wei J, Gorbounov M, Wei C. New technology and clinical applications of nanomedicine. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:845–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Z, Huang P, Lin J, et al. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-conjugated dendrimer-modified quantum dots for targeting and imaging melanoma. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;10:4859–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nair A, Shen J, Thevenot P, et al. Enhanced intratumoral uptake of quantum dots concealed within hydrogel nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2008;19:485102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Q, Iwakuma N, Sharma P, et al. Gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent for in vivo tumor imaging with photoacoustic tomography. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:395102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aillon KL, Xie Y, El-Gendy N, et al. Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(6):457–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim C, Cho EC, Chen J, et al. In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bio conjugated gold nanocages. ACS Nano. 2010;4(8):4559–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmieder AH, Winter PM, Caruthers SD, et al. Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with alphanubeta3-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:621–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Longo C, Gambara G, Espina V, et al. A novel biomarker harvesting nanotechnology identifies Bak as a candidate melanoma biomarker in serum. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasir A. Nanotechnology and dermatology: part I–potential of nanotechnology. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28:458–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie K. Kim MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, J.K., Nasir, A., Nelson, K.C. (2013). Nanotechnology and the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Malignancies. In: Nasir, A., Friedman, A., Wang, S. (eds) Nanotechnology in Dermatology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5034-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5034-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5033-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5034-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics