Skip to main content

Understanding Health By Building Better Bio-Medical Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health

Abstract

Current medical thinking is the product of many years of intellectual evolution with influences coming from a number of different sources. As noted earlier (Chap.1), medicine has passed through stages comparable with the theological and metaphysical (or abstract) stages proposed by Comte. Now, medicine very much exists within a scientific (or positive) framework. In passing through different phases in its development, medicine has been subject to different modes of thinking. These have coloured the explanations and descriptions of what was being experienced by suffering individuals. Keating and Cambrosio [1] have proposed that such ways of thinking—that is, medical models—play a key part in all clinical thinking. They go so far as to suggest that ‘… the object of medicine is not the bodyper sebut, rather, models of the body’ [1]. The human body is not necessarily seen as it really is but rather as it appears in terms of the conceptual models that have emerged over time. As a consequence, these models form intellectual frameworks within which one’s professional duties are conducted. It is not necessarily the case that the models by which many work are being deliberately or explicitly followed. Rather, a mental image or impression builds up tacitly over time as a result of a number of different influences. It is important to continually strive for the development of the best models possible and not to rely upon some traditional way of thinking merely because it appears to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keating P, Cambrosio A. Biomedical platforms - realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth-century medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 1973;35:125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nesse R, Williams G. Why we get sick - the new science of Darwinian medicine. New York: Times Books; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nesse R, Williams G. Evolution and healing - the new science of Darwinian medicine. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nesse R, Williams G. Evolutionary biology in the medical curriculum - what every physician should know. Bioscience. 1997;47:664–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesse R. Medicine’s missing basic science. The New Physician (December); 2001. p. 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nesse R, Schiffman J. Evolutionary biology in the medical school curriculum. Bioscience. 2003;53(6):585–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nesse R, Stearns S, Omenn G. Medicine needs evolution. Science. 2006;311:1071–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis S. Seeking a new biomedical model. How evolutionary biology may contribute. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):745–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis S. Conceptual models of the human organism: towards a new biomedical understanding of the individual. In: Komorowska M, Olsztynska-Janus S, editors. Biomedical engineering, trends, research and technologies. Vienna: Intech; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cronin H. The ant and the peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canguilhem G. On the normal and the pathological (C Fawcett, Trans.). Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishing Company; 1966 (trans 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Melzack R, Wall P. The challenge of pain. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marinker M. Why make people patients? J Med Ethics. 1975;1:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Darwin, CR. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray; 1859. http://darwin-online.org.uk/contents.html#origin. Accessed 11 Nov 2011.

  16. Spencer H. Principles of biology. London: Williams and Norgate; 1864.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Annette Lewis for her help in the preparation of the manuscript of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Lewis B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, S. (2013). Understanding Health By Building Better Bio-Medical Models. In: Sturmberg, J., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4998-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4998-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4997-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4998-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics