Abstract
As data centers proliferate in size and number, improving energy efficiency and productivity has become an economic and environmental imperative. Making these improvements requires metrics that are robust, interpretable, and practical. We examine the properties of a number of proposed metrics of energy efficiency and productivity. In particular, we focus on the Data Center Energy Productivity (DCeP) metric, which is the ratio of useful work produced by the data center to the energy consumed performing that work. We investigated DCeP as the principal outcome of a designed experiment using a highly instrumented, high-performance computing (HPC) data center. We found that DCeP was successful in clearly distinguishing different operational states in the data center, thereby validating its utility as a metric for identifying configurations of hardware and software that would improve energy productivity. We also discuss some of the challenges and benefits associated with implementing the DCeP metric, and we examine the efficacy of the metric in making comparisons within a data center and among data centers.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This work is based on an earlier work: Implementing the Data Center Energy Productivity Metric, in Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, (Volume 8, Issue 4, Article 30, October 2012) ©ACM 2012. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2367736.2367741
- 2.
Due to nonlinearity, we do not view productivity as an intensive property, as proposed by Kamil et al. [20]. However, we agree with their bias discussion: productivity can be biased by scale.
- 3.
Our use of the terms accuracy, error, and precision are consistent with those used by the International Vocabulary of Metrology [19].
- 4.
- 5.
Similar concepts have been proposed by other organizations such as the Uptime Institute.
- 6.
Provided the definition of useful work and the scope of energy consumption is consistent for all systems under comparison.
- 7.
This capability did not actually exist in the ESDC. Instead, the water temperature for liquid cooling was regulated via a separate heat exchanger meant to simulate the cooling that would be provided by cooling towers.
References
Amdahl GM (1967) Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: Proceedings of the spring joint computer conference, AFIPS ’67 (Spring), Atlantic City, 18–20 Apr 1967. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 483–485
ASHRAE (2011) ASHRAE TC 9.9: 2011 thermal guidelines for data processing environments-expanded data center classes and usage guidance. Technical report, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers. http://www.eni.com/green-data-center/it_IT/static/pdf/ASHRAE_1.pdf
Baer M, Mundy CJ, Chang TM, Tao FM, Dang LX (2010) Interpreting vibrational sum-frequency spectra of sulfur dioxide at the air/water interface: a comprehensive molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem B 114(21):7245–7249
Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
CP2K (2011) CP2K developers home page. http://www.cp2k.org
Dean A, Voss D (1999) Design and analysis of experiments. Springer, New York
Edwards W, Miles R, von Winterfeldt D (2007) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
EPA (2007) Report to Congress on server and data center energy efficiency, public law 109-431. Technical report, United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=prod_development.server_efficiency_study
EPA (2010) ENERGY STAR computer server specification Draft 1 Version 2.0. Technical report, United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod_development/revisions/downloads/computer_servers/Draft1Version2ComputerServers.pdf
Feng W, Scogland T (2009) The Green500 list: year one. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international symposium on parallel & distributed processing, IPDPS ’09, Rome. pp 1–7
Ge R, Feng X, Cameron KW (2009) Modeling and evaluating energy-performance efficiency of parallel processing on multicore based power aware systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international symposium on parallel & distributed processing, IPDPS ’09, Rome. pp 1–8
Ge R, Feng X, Song S, Chang HC, Li D, Cameron K (2010) Powerpack: energy profiling and analysis of high-performance systems and applications. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 21(5):658–671
Goicoechea A, Hansen DR, Duckstein L (1982) Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New York
Greenhill D (2005) SWaP: space, watts, and power. Technical report, Sun Microsystems. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/products/downloads/Greenhill_Pres.pdf
Gustafson JL (1988) Reevaluating Amdahl’s law. Commun ACM 31(5):532–533
Hewlett-Packard Company: HP Data Center Smart Grid. http://h17007.www1.hp.com/us/en/converged-infrastructure/ci-arch.aspx
Hewlett-Packard Company: HP Insight Control. http://h18013.www1.hp.com/products/servers/management/index.html
IBM: Tivoli Monitoring for Energy Management. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/monitor-energy-management/
JCGM (2008) International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2008.pdf
Kamil S, Shalf J, Strohmaier E (2008) Power efficiency in high performance computing. In: IEEE international symposium on parallel and distributed processing, IPDPS ’08, Miami, pp 1–8
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York
Ma J, Fan Z, Huang L (1999) A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur J Oper Res 112:397–404
R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org
Sego LH, Márquez A, Rawson A, Cader T, Fox K, Gustafson WI Jr, Mundy CJ (2012) Implementing the data center energy productivity metric. ACM J Emerg Technol Comput Syst 8(4):1–22 (Article 30)
Sisk DR, Khaleel MA, Márquez A, Hatley D, Cader T, Schmidt R (2009) Real-time data center energy efficiency at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. ASHRAE Trans 115(Part I): 242–253
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf
Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (2008) SPECpower_ssj2008 Benchmark. http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008
Stanley JR, Brill KG, Koomey J (2007) Four metrics define data center “greenness”. Technical report, The Uptime Institute.
TGG (2008) A framework for data center energy productivity. Technical report 13, The Green Grid. http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/Global/Content/white-papers/Framework-for-Data-Center-Energy-Productivity
TGG (2008) Green grid data center power efficiency metrics: PUE and DCIE. Technical report 6, The Green Grid. http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/Global/Content/white-papers/The-Green-Grid-Data-Center-Power-Efficiency-Metrics-PUE-and-DCiE
TGG (2009) Proxy proposals for measuring data center productivity. Technical report 17, The Green Grid. http://www.thegreengrid.org/en/Global/Content/white-papers/Proxy-Proposals-for-Measuring-Data-Center-Efficiency
The Green 500: http://www.green500.org
VandeVondele J, Krack M, Mohamed F, Parrinello M, Chassaing T, Hutter J (2005) Quickstep: fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed gaussian and plane waves approach. Comput Phys Commun 167(2):103–128
Wang L, Khan SU (2011) Review of performance metrics for green data centers: a taxonomy study. J Supercomput 1–18.
Wang YM, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1–2):1–12
Wang YM, Parkan C (2005) Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: ranking and weighting. Fuzzy Sets Syst 153(3):331–346
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under DE-Award Numbers 47128, 55430, and SC0005365.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sego, L.H. et al. (2013). Implementing the Data Center Energy Productivity Metric in a High-Performance Computing Data Center. In: Pande, P., Ganguly, A., Chakrabarty, K. (eds) Design Technologies for Green and Sustainable Computing Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4975-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4975-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4974-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4975-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)