Advertisement

Pot-Honey pp 135-152 | Cite as

Mexican Stingless Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Diversity, Distribution, and Indigenous Knowledge

  • Ricardo AyalaEmail author
  • Victor H. Gonzalez
  • Michael S. Engel
Chapter

Abstract

Stingless bees (Apinae: Meliponini) are highly eusocial apine bees commonly encountered in tropical and subtropical areas of the world but are more diverse in the Western Hemisphere. In Mexico, stingless bees represent a relatively small fraction (2.6%) of the large bee fauna of the country, but the economic, social, and cultural impacts they have are like no other in the world. When compared to other countries with more diverse stingless bee faunas, a large percentage (41.3%) of the total number of Mexican stingless bees are exploited by indigenous people in the country at least since pre-Colombian times and possibly well before. Stingless bees played a significant role in Mayan religious views and today they are directly or indirectly used for diverse purposes, including managed pollination, medicine, crafts, and folk art; while honey, wax, and pollen are regularly extracted and sold, thus providing an important source of income for indigenous and non-indigenous populations. Herein, we summarize the diversity, distribution, origin, and traditional uses of the stingless bees in Mexico. We also discuss the challenges and future directions for the study and conservation of this important lineage of bees.

Keywords

Indigenous Knowledge Cloud Forest Tropical Evergreen Forest North American Lineage Mountain North 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Amy Comfort de Gonzalez, Claus Rasmussen, David W Roubik, Miguel Ortega, and Silvia RM Pedro for constructive comments and suggestions that improved this contribution, to Patricia Vit for inviting us to contribute to the present chapter, and to Carlos Balboa, Jorge Mérida, and Manuel Guzman for the images of Melipona and Scaptotrigona. Partial support was provided by US National Science Foundation grant DBI-1057366 (to MSE). This is a contribution of the Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum.

References

  1. Ascher JS, Pickering J. 2011. Bee Species Guide (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Available at: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species.
  2. Ayala R. 1988. La fauna de abejas silvestres (Hymenoptera; Apoidea) de Chamela, Jalisco. México. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 77:395–493.Google Scholar
  3. Ayala R. 1997. Las abejas sin aguijón (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae) de la región de los Tuxtlas en el Estado de Veracruz. pp. 361–364. In González-Soriano E, Dirzo R, Vogt R, eds. Historia Natural de la Estación de Biología Tropical de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz. Instituto de Biología, UNAM; México DF, México. 647 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Ayala R. 1999. Revisión de las abejas sin aguijón de México (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini). Folia Entomológica Mexicana 106:1–123.Google Scholar
  5. Ayala R, Griswold TL, Bullock SH. 1993. The native bees of Mexico. pp. 179–227. In Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, eds. Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origin and Distribution. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK. 812 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Ayala R, Griswold TL, Yanega D. 1996. Apoidea (Hymenoptera). pp. 423–464. In Llorente-B J, García Aldrete AN, Gonzalez E, eds. Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografía de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento. Instituto de Biología, UNAM; México DF, México. 660 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett ET. 1831. Some accounts of the habits of a Mexican bee, partly from the notes on Captain Beechey: with a description of the insect and its hive. pp. 357–365, + 2pls. In Beechey FW, Narrative of a Voyage to the Pacific and Beering’s Strait, to Co-operate with the Polar Expeditions: Performed in His Majesty’s Ship Blossom, under the Command of Captain FW Beechey, RN, FW in the years 1825, 26, 27, 28 [Volume 2]. Henry Colburn & Richard Bentley; London, UK. iv+452 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett FC. 1964. Stingless-bee keeping in eastern Mexico. Geographical Review 54(1):85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cajete G. 2000. Indigenous Knowledge: The Pueblo Metaphor of Indigenous Education. pp. 181–191. In Battiste M, ed. Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. UBC Press; Vancouver, Canada. 314 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Camargo JMF, Moure JS. 1994. Meliponini Neotropicais: Os gêneros Paratrigona Schwarz, 1938 e Aparatrigona Moure, 1951 (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Arquivos de Zoología 32:33–109.Google Scholar
  11. Camargo JMF, Pedro SRM. 2007. Meliponini Lepeletier, 1836. pp. 272–578. In Moure JS, Urban D, Melo GAR, eds. Catalogue of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia; Curitiba, Brazil. xiv+1058 pp. [Available and updated online at: http://www.moure.cria.org.br/catalogue].
  12. Camargo JMF, Posey DA. 1990. O conhecimento dos Kayapó sobre as abelhas sociais sem ferrão (Meliponidae, Apidae, Hymenoptera): Notas adicionais. Boletin do Museu Paranaense, Emílio Goeldi, Série Zoologia 6:17–42.Google Scholar
  13. Camargo JMF, Moure JS, Roubik DW. 1988. Melipona yucatanica new species (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae); stingless bee dispersal across the Caribbean Arc and post-Eocene vicariance. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 64:147–157.Google Scholar
  14. Camargo JMF, Grimaldi DA, Pedro SRM. 2000. The extinct fauna of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in Dominican amber: Two new species and redescription of the male of Proplebeia dominicana (Wille and Chandler). American Museum Novitates 3293:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cockerell TDA. 1913. Meliponine bees from Central America. Psyche 20:10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coe SD, Coe MD. 1996. The True History of Chocolate. Thames and Hudson; New York, USA. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Crane E. 1992. The past and present status of beekeeping with stingless bees. Bee World 73:29–42.Google Scholar
  18. Cresson ET. 1878. Descriptions of new species of North American bees. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 30:181–221.Google Scholar
  19. Dalla Torre CG, de [KW, von]. 1896. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Volumen X: Apidae (Anthophila). Engelmann; Lipsiae [Leipzig], Germany. viii+643 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Dixon CV. 1987. Beekeeping in southern Mexico. Yearbook of the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 13:66–77.Google Scholar
  21. Donnelly WD. 1988. Geologic constraints on Caribbean biogeography. pp. 15–37. In Liebherr JK, ed. Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. Cornell University Press; Ithaca, New York, USA. ix+[i]+285 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Engel MS. 2000. A new interpretation of the oldest fossil bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). American Museum Novitates 3296:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engel MS. 2001a. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259:1–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engel MS. 2001b. Monophyly and extensive extinction of advanced eusocial bees: Insights from an unexpected Eocene diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 98:1661–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engel MS. 2004a. Arthropods in Mexican amber. pp. 175–186. In Llorente-Bousquets J, Morrone JJ, Yáñez-Ordóñez O, Vargas-Fernández I, eds. Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografía de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento [Volume IV]. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México DF, México. 790 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Engel MS. 2004b. Geological history of the bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Revista de Tecnologia e Ambiente 10:9–33.Google Scholar
  27. Engel MS, Hinojosa-Díaz IA, Rasnitsyn AP. 2009. A honey bee from the Miocene of Nevada and the biogeography of Apis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini). Proceeding of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 4 60:23–38.Google Scholar
  28. Friese H. 1900. Neue Arten der Bienengattungen Melipona Ill, und Trigona Jur. Természetrajzi Füzetek 23:381–394.Google Scholar
  29. González AJ. 1983. Acerca de la regionalización de la nomenclatura Maya de abejas sin aguijón (Melipona sp.) en Yucatán. Revista de Geografía Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo 5–6:190–193.Google Scholar
  30. González AJ. 1989. La Meliponicultura. Mundo Apícola 1:21–23.Google Scholar
  31. Gonzalez VH, Engel MS. 2004. The tropical Andean bee fauna (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with examples from Colombia. Entomologische Abhandlungen 62:65–75.Google Scholar
  32. Gonzalez VH, Griswold T. 2011. Two new species of Paratrigona and the male of Paratrigona ornaticeps (Hymenoptera, Apidae). ZooKeys 120:9–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greco MK, Welz PM, Siegrist M, Ferguson SJ, Gallmann P, Roubik DW, Engel MS. 2011. Description of an ancient social bee trapped in amber using diagnostic radioentomology. Insectes Sociaux 58:487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guérin-Méneville PE. 1829–1838 [1844]. Iconographie du régne animal de G. Cuvier, ou représentation d’après Nature de l’une des espèces les plus remarquables, et souvent non encore figurées, de chaque genre d’animaux. Avec un text descriptif mis au courant de la science. Ouvrage pouvant servir d’atlas a tous les traités de zoologie. Insectes. Baillière; Paris, France. 576 pp. [Figure plates are in a separate volume (III), the bees appearing on plates 73–75 and the meliponines on pl. 75, figs. 6–7].Google Scholar
  35. Guzmán M, Balboa C, Vandame R, Albores ML, González-Acereto J. 2011. Manejo de las abejas nativas sin aguijón en México. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur; México DF, México. 65 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Halffter G. 1976. Distribución de los insectos en la zona de transición mexicana. Relaciones con la entomofauna de Norte América. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 35:1–64.Google Scholar
  37. Halffter G. 1978. Un nuevo patrón de dispersión en la zona de transición mexicana: El mesoamericano de montaña. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 39–40:291–226.Google Scholar
  38. Halffter G. 1987. Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annual Review of Entomology 32:95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hernandez F. 1648. Rerum Medicarum Novae Hispaniae Thesaurus: Nova Plantarum, Animalium et Mineralium Historia. Vitalis Mascardi; Romae [Rome, Italy]. 950+[10]+[90]+[6] pp.Google Scholar
  40. Kotthoff U, Wappler T, Engel MS. 2011. Miocene honey bees from the Randeck Maar of southwestern Germany (Hymenoptera, Apidae). ZooKeys 96:11–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Labougle JM, Zozaya JA. 1986. La apicultura en México. Ciencia y Desarollo, México 69:17–36.Google Scholar
  42. Latreille PA. 1811. Insectes de l’Amérique Equinoxiale, recueillis pendant le voyage de MM. de Humboldt et Bonpland. pp. 127–297, [seconde partie] 9–64. In Humboldt A de, Bonpland A, eds. Recueil d’Observations de Zoologie et d’Anatomie comparée, faites dans l’Ocean Atlantique, dans l’interieur du nouveau continent et dans la mer du sud pendant les annees 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802 et 1803; par Al. de Humboldt et A. Bonpland [Premier Volume]. Schoell & Dufour et Comp.; Paris, France. viii+1–368, 1–64 pp., +34 pls. [The bees appear on pp. 173174, 260–297, pls. xvi–xvii, xix–xxi].Google Scholar
  43. Michener CD. 2007. The Bees of the World [2nd Edition]. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, Maryland. xvi+[i]+953 pp., +20 pls.Google Scholar
  44. Michener CD, Grimaldi DA. 1988a. A Trigona from Late Cretaceus amber of New Jersey (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). American Museum Novitates 2917:1–12.Google Scholar
  45. Michener CD, Grimaldi DA. 1988b. The oldest fossil bee: Apoid history, evolutionary stasis, and antiquity of social behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 85:6424–6426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. May-Itzá W de J, González JA, De La Rúa P, Serrano J, Medina-Medina LA, Quezada-Euán JJG. 2008. Crianza de abejas sin aguijón en Mesoamérica. Vida Apícola 152:50–55.Google Scholar
  47. Moure JS, Camargo JMF. 1982. Partamona (Nogueirapis) minor, nova espécie de Meliponinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) do Amazonas e notas sobre Plebeia varicolor (Ducke). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Coeldi, Série Zoología 120:1–10.Google Scholar
  48. Murillo RM. 1981. Uso y manejo actual de las colonias de Melipona beecheii Bennett (Apidae: Meliponini) en el estado de Tabasco México. Biótica 9:423–428.Google Scholar
  49. Nates-Parra G. 2005. Abejas Corbiculadas de Colombia: Hymenoptera: Apidae. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias; Bogotá, Colombia. 156 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Ortiz P. 2009. Indigenous Knowledge, Education and Ethnic Identity: An Ethnography of an Intercultural Bilingual Education Program in a Mapuche School in Chile. VDM-Verlag; Saarbrücken, Germany. 204 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Posey DA. 1993. Indigenous knowledge in the conservation and use of world forests. pp. 59–77. In Ramikrishna K, Woodwell G, eds. World Forests for the Future: Their Use and Conservation. Yale University Press; New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 156 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Posey DA, Camargo JMF. 1985. Additional notes on the classification and knowledge of stingless bees (Meliponinae, Apidae, Hymenoptera) by the Kayapó Indians of Gorotire, Pará, Brazil. Annals of Carnegie Museum 54:247–274.Google Scholar
  53. Purchas S. 1657. A theatre of political flying-insects, wherein especially the nature, the worth, the work, the wonder, and the manner of right-ordering of the bee, is discovered and described. Together with discourses, historical, and observations physical concerning them. And in a second part are annexed meditations, and observations theological and moral, in three centuries upon that subject. RI and Thomas Parkhurst; London, UK. [1–25]+387 pp.Google Scholar
  54. Roubik DW. 1979. Africanized honeybees, stingless bees, and the structure of tropical plant-­pollinator communities. In: D. Caron (ed), Proceedings Vth International Symposium on Pollination. Maryland Agricultural Experimental Station Miscellaneous Publication No. 1 College Park, Maryland, USA, pp 403–417 (p 558) Roubik DW. 2000. The de-flowering of Central America: a current perspective. In: Proceedings of the sixth international bee research conference on tropical bees IBRA, Cardiff, UK., pp 144–151 (p 289) Say T. 1837. Descriptions of new species of North American Hymenoptera, and observations on some already described. Boston Journal of Natural History 1:361–416.Google Scholar
  55. Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I, Arz JA, Barton PJ, Brown PR, Bralower TJ, Christeson GL, Claeys P, Cockell CS, Collins GS, Deutsch A, Goldin TJ, Goto K, Grajales-Nishimura JM, Grieve RAF, Gulick SPS, Johnson KR, Kiessling W, Koeberl C, Kring DA, MacLeod KG, Matsui T, Melosh J, Montanari A, Morgan JV, Neal CR, Nichols DJ, Norris RD, Pierazzo E, Ravizza G, Rebolledo-Vieyra M, Reimold WU, Robin E, Salge T, Speijer RP, Sweet AR, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Vajda V, Whalen MT, Willumsen PS. 2010. The Chixulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science 327:1214–1218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwarz HF. 1948. Stingless bees (Meliponidae) of the Western Hemisphere. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 90:1–546.Google Scholar
  57. Schwarz HF. 1949. The stingless bees of Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biología Mexicana 20:357–370.Google Scholar
  58. Semali L, Kincheloe JL, eds. 1999. What is Indigenous Knowledge? Voices from the Academy. Falmer Press; New York, USA. 318 pp.Google Scholar
  59. Simpson BB, Neff JL. 1985. Plants, their pollinating bees and the great American interchange. pp. 427–452. In Stehi FG, Webb SD, eds. The Great American Biotic lnterchange. Plenum Press; London, UK. 532 pp.Google Scholar
  60. Slaa EJ, Sánchez LA, Malagodi-Braga KS, Hofstede FE. 2006. Stingless bees in applied pollination: Practice and perspectives. Apidologie 37:293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stearman AM, Stierlin E, Sigman ME, Roubik DW, Dorrien D. 2008. Stradivarius in the jungle: Traditional knowledge and the use of “black beeswax” among the Yuquí of the Bolivian Amazon. Human Ecology 36:149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strand E. 1917. Über einige Apidae des Deutschen Entomologischen Museums. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abteilung A 83:57–71.Google Scholar
  63. Toledo VM. 1982. Pleistocene changes of vegetation in tropical Mexico. pp. 93–111. In Prance GT, ed. Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press; New York, New York, USA. 714 pp.Google Scholar
  64. Villanueva-G R, Roubik DW, Colli-Ucán W. 2005. Extinction of Melipona beecheii and traditional beekeeping in the Yucatán Peninsula. Bee World 86:35–41.Google Scholar
  65. Wheeler QD. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 359:571–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wheeler QD. 2009. The science of insect taxonomy: Prospects and needs. pp. 359–380. In Foottit RG, Adler PH, eds. Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Wiley-Blackwell; Chichester, UK. xxi+ 632 pp.Google Scholar
  67. Wille A, Chandler LC. 1964. A new stingless bee from the Tertiary amber of the Dominican Republic (Hymenoptera; Meliponini). Revista de Biología Tropical 12(2):187–195.Google Scholar
  68. Wille A. 1959. A new fossil stingless bee (Meliponini) from the amber of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 33:849–852, +1 pl.Google Scholar
  69. Wille A. 1977. A general review of the fossil stingless bees. Revista de Biología Tropical 25:43–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Ayala
    • 1
    Email author
  • Victor H. Gonzalez
    • 2
  • Michael S. Engel
    • 3
  1. 1.Estación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de BiologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)San PatricioMexico
  2. 2.Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Biological SciencesWeatherfordUSA
  3. 3.Division of Entomology, Natural History MuseumUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations