Pot-Honey pp 187-199 | Cite as

Stingless Bee Food Location Communication: From the Flowers to the Honey Pots

  • Daniel SánchezEmail author
  • Rémy Vandame


Colonies of meliponine bees consist of hundreds to thousands of individuals, both adults and brood; however, the responsibility of bringing food home depends on just a small group of workers, the foragers. Honey, pollen, and other products that beekeepers obtain come from the hard work of these few bees. Thus in many of these species complex behavioral mechanisms have evolved in order to make more efficient the collection of food and to allow the survival of the colony. This chapter describes in some detail the processes associated with the communication systems in meliponines that permit them to improve food gathering at a social level. Given the great amount of knowledge obtained in studying honeybee communication, several references to Apis mellifera are given throughout.


Pheromone Trail Social Facilitation Internal Information Sound Pulse Successful Forager 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank the opportune suggestions made by Dr. James Nieh which greatly improved this manuscript, and to the financial support of CONACYT agreement no. 128702 “Evolución de la Cleptobiosis en Lestrimelitta (Apidae, Meliponini)”.


  1. Aguilar I, Briceño D. 2002. Sounds in Melipona costaricensis (Apidae : Meliponini): effect of sugar concentration and nectar source distance. Apidologie 33:375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar I, Fonseca A, Biesmeijer JC. 2005. Recruitment and communication of food source location in three species of stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie 36:313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguilar I, Sommeijer M. 2001. The deposition of anal excretions by Melipona favosa foragers (Apidae: Meliponinae): behavioural observations concerning the location of food sources. Apidologie 32:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arenas A, Fernandez VM, Farina WM. 2007. Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees’ foraging decisions. Naturwissenschaften 94:218–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth FG, Hrncir M, Jarau S. 2008. Signals and cues in the recruitment behavior of stingless bees (Meliponini). Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 194:313–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesmeijer JC, de Vries H. 2001. Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49:89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biesmeijer JC, Slaa EJ. 2004. Information flow and organization of stingless bee foraging. Apidologie 35:143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesmeijer JC, van Nieuwstadt MGL, Lukács S, Sommeijer MJ. 1998. The role of internal and external information in foraging decisions of Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burger J, Gochfeld M. 1992. Effect of group size on vigilance while drinking in the coati, Nasua narica in Costa Rica. Animal Behaviour 44:1053–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron SA, Mardulyn P. 2001. Multiple molecular data sets suggest independent origins of highly eusocial behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Apinae). Systematic Biology 50:194–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins AM, Rinderer TE, Daly HV, Harbo JR, Pesante D. 1989. Alarm pheromone production by two honeybees (Apis mellifera) types. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15:1747–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Marco RJ, Farina WM. 2003. Trophallaxis in forager honeybees (Apis mellifera): resource uncertainty enhances begging contacts? Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 189:125–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dornhaus A, Chittka L. 2004. Information flow and regulation of foraging activity in bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Apidologie 35:183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dornhaus A, Klügl F, Oechslein C, Puppe F, Chittka L. 2006. Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model. Behavioral Ecology 17:336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyer FC. 2002a. The biology of the dance language. Annual Review of Entomology 47:917–949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dyer FC. 2002b. When it pays to waggle. Nature 419:885–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esch H. 1967. The evolution of bee language. Scientific American 216:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esch H, Esch I, Kerr WE. 1965. Sound: an element common to communication of stingless bees and to dances of the honey bee. Science 149:320–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farina WM, Nunez JA. 1995. Trophallaxis in Apis mellifera: Effects of sugar concentration and crop load and food distribution. Journal of Apicultural Research 34:93–96.Google Scholar
  20. Galef Jr. BG. 1976. Social transmission of acquired behavior: A discussion of tradition and social learning in vertebrates. pp. 77–100. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Shaw E and Beer C (eds), Advances in the Study of Behavior. Vol 6. Academic Press; New York, USA. 299 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Galef BG, Jr., Giraldeau LA. 2001. Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Animal Behaviour 61:3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gould JL, Gould CG. 1988. The Honey Bee. Scientific American Library; New York, USA. 239 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Goulson D. 1999. Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution & Systematics 2:185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG. 2000. Recruitment behavior in stingless bees, Melipona scutellaris and M. quadrifasciata. II. Possible mechanisms of communication. Apidologie 31:93–113.Google Scholar
  25. Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG. 2004. Thorax vibrations of a stingless bee (Melipona seminigra). II. Dependence on sugar concentration. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural and Behavioral Physiology 190:549–560.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson RN, Oldroyd BP, Barron AB, Crozier RH. 2002. Genetic control of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) dance language: segregating dance forms in a backcrossed colony. Journal of Heredity 93:170–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerr WE. 1994. Communication among Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 7:123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerr WE, Blum M, Fales HM. 1981. Communication of food sources between workers of Trigona (Trigona) spinipes. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 41:619–623.Google Scholar
  29. Lindauer M. 1967. Recent advances in bee communication and orientation. Annual Review of Entomology 12:439–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindauer M, Kerr WE. 1960. Communication between the workers of stingless bees. Bee World 41:29–41, 65–71.Google Scholar
  31. Michener CD. 2000. The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore MD, USA. 952 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Nieh JC. 1998a. The food recruitment dance of the stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieh JC. 1998b. The role of a scent beacon in the communication of food location in the stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nieh JC. 1999. Stingless-bee communication. American Scientist 87:428–435.Google Scholar
  35. Nieh JC. 2004. Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie 35:159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nieh JC, Contrera FAL, Nogueira-Neto P. 2003a. Pulsed mass-recruitment by a stingless bee, Trigona hyalinata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 270:2191–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieh JC, Contrera FAL, Rangel J, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 2003b. Effect of food location and quality on recruitment sounds and success in two stingless bees, Melipona mandacaia and Melipona bicolor. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nieh JC, Contrera FAL, Yoon RR, Barreto LS, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. 2004. Polarized short odor-trail recruitment communication by a stingless bee, Trigona spinipes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56:435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieh JC, Roubik DW. 1998. Potential mechanisms for the communication of height and distance by a stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Page RE, Jr., Robinson GE, Fondrk MK, Nasr ME. 1995. Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honeybee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36:387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robinson GE. 1986. The dance language of the honeybee: the controversy and its resolution. American Bee Journal 126:184–189.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson GE. 1998. Colony integration in honeybees: genetic, endocrine and social control of division of labor. Apidologie 29:159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson GE, Page RE, Jr. 1989. Genetic determination of nectar foraging, pollen foraging, and nest-site scouting in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roubik DW. 1989. Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press; New York, USA. 514 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Sánchez D, Kraus F, Hernández M, Vandame R. 2007. Experience but not distance influences the recruitment precision in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana. Naturwissenschaften 94:567–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sánchez D, Nieh JC, Hénaut Y, Cruz L, Vandame R. 2004. High precision during food recruitment of experienced (reactivated) foragers in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana (Apidae, Meliponini). Naturwissenschaften 91:346–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt VM, Zucchi R, Barth FG. 2003. A stingless bee marks the feeding site in addition to the scent path (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis). Apidologie 34:237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seeley TD. 1995. The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, USA. 295 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Seeley T. 2010. Honeybee Democracy. Princeton University Press; Princeton NJ, USA. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Slaa EJ. 2003. Foraging ecology of stingless bees: from individual behaviour to community ecology. In. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University; Utrecht, Netherlands, 181 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Slaa EJ, Hughes WO. 2009. Local enhancement, local inhibition, eavesdropping, and the parasitism of social insect communication. pp. 147–164. In: Jarau S, Hrncir M, (eds). Food Exploitation by Social Insects: Ecological, Behavioral, and Theoretical Approaches. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; Boca Raton, FL, USA. 360 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Stabentheiner A. 1996. Effect of foraging distance on the thermal behaviour of honeybees during dancing, walking and trophallaxis. Ethology 102:360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Towne WF, Gould JL. 1988. The spatial precision of the honey bees’ dance communication. Journal of Insect Behavior 1:129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Visscher PK. 1998. Colony integration and reproductive conflict in honey bees. Apidologie 29:23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. von Frisch K. 1967. The Dance Language and Orientation Of Bees. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, USA. 566 pp.Google Scholar
  56. Wainselboim AJ, Farina WM. 2000. Trophallaxis in the honeybee Apis mellifera (L.): the interaction between flow of solution and sucrose concentration of the exploited food sources. Animal Behaviour 59:1177–1185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weidenmuller A, Seeley TD. 1999. Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wenner AM. 2002. The elusive honey bee dance “language” hypothesis. Journal of Insect Behavior 15:859–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wenner AM, Wells PH, Johnson DL. 1969. Honey bees: do they use the direction and distance information provided by their dancers? Science 158:1076–1077.Google Scholar
  60. Wille A. 1983. Biology of the stingless bees. Annual Review of Entomology 28:41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson EO. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; Cambridge, USA. 548 pp.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson EO. 2000. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, 25th anniversary ed. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; Cambridge, USA. 697 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.El Colegio de la Frontera SurTapachulaMexico

Personalised recommendations