Abstract
Over two decades, we and other research groups have found that ethnographic and social analyses of work settings can provide insights useful to the process of systems analysis and design. Despite this, ethnographic and social analyses have not been widely assimilated into industrial practice. Practitioners still address sociotechnical factors in an ad hoc manner often after having observed that a system has become problematic during implementation. In response to this we have developed a lightweight qualitative approach to provide insights to ameliorate problematic implementations. We demonstrate that the analysis of intentional and structural factors to inform system deployment and adoption can provide actionable insights in a short period of time in a manner that is compatible with the ad hoc approach of industry. We evaluate our approach using a case study of a problematic enterprise document management system within a multinational systems engineering organisation. Our findings are of significance as we demonstrate an approach that informs a different phase of information systems development to typical social analyses and in doing so appears to provide a better fit with industrial practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson S, Hardstone G, Procter R, Williams R (2005) Down in the (data)base(ment): supporting configuration in organisational information systems. In: Ackerman MS, Halverson CA, Erickson T, Kellogg WA (eds) Resources, co-evolution and artifacts. Springer, London
Avison D, Fitzgerald G (2006) Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, London
Avison D, Wood-Harper T, Vidgen R, Wood JRG (1998) A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2. Info Technol People 11(2):124–139
Bygstad B, Nielsen PA, Munkvold BE (2010) Four integration patterns: a socio-technical approach to integration in IS development projects. Info Syst J 20(1):53–80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00280.x
Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice includes a 30 year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester
Delone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Info Syst 19(4):9–30
Doherty N, King M (2005) From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects. Eur J Info Syst 14:1–5. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000517
Engestrom Y (2000) Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43(7):960
Forrester JW (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory Decis 2(2):109–140. doi:10.1007/bf00148991
Gable GG, Sedera D, Chan T (2003) Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. In: International conference on information systems, Seattle, Washington, DC, USA, pp 576–591. Association for Information Systems
Halloran J (2000) The activity space: analyzing intentionality in open cooperative work. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex
Halloran J (2002) Taking the ‘No’ out of Lotus Notes: activity theory, groupware, and student groupwork. Paper presented at the CSCL ‘02, international conference on computer-supported collaborative learning
Hutchins E (1995) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cogn Sci 19(3):265–288
Mumford E (1995) Effective systems design and requirements analysis: the ethics approach. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamura K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ Sci 6(4):423–444. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.4.423
Stewart J, Williams R (2005) The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user. In: Rohracher H (ed) User Involvement in innovation processes. Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Profil-Verlag, Munich
Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Viller S, Sommerville I (1999) Coherence: an approach to representing ethnographic analyses in systems design. Hum Comput Interact 14:9–41
Viller S, Sommerville I (2000) Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers. Int J Hum Comput Stud 53(1):169–196
Williams R, Stewart J, Slack R (2005) Social learning in technological innovation: experimenting with information and communication technologies. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Yu ESK (1997) Towards modeling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Greenwood, D., Sommerville, I. (2013). Expectations and Reality: Why an Enterprise Software System Did Not Work as Planned. In: Pooley, R., Coady, J., Schneider, C., Linger, H., Barry, C., Lang, M. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4951-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4951-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4950-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4951-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)