Skip to main content

Federal and State Marketing Orders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
US Programs Affecting Food and Agricultural Marketing

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 38))

Abstract

Marketing orders (MO) have been a fundamental component of US ­agricultural policy since the 1937 Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act. They were established to modify the conduct and performance of participants in selected agricultural commodity markets to achieve “orderly marketing.” As of 2011, MO existed for milk and approximately 22 types of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and specialty crops. Commodities regulated by MO share certain economic characteristics, including greater perishability (less storability), price variation and related distributional inequalities and multiple market outlets providing opportunities for price discrimination. MO for fruits, vegetables, nuts, and specialty crops have provisions that focus on grades and standards (including food safety) and volume restrictions (often linked to opportunities for price discrimination). MO for milk focus on minimum price regulation, with emphasis on milk used for fluid purposes. The economic impacts of MO have been examined in numerous studies, often without a strong consensus about how they affect the various forms of economic efficiency, either in general or for specific commodities. Policy options for MO include (a) maintaining current MO, (b) replacing MO with other government marketing programs, (c) modifying MO to keep pace with changes in industry and market characteristics, and (d) elimination of MO with or without a phase-out period. Additional research on MO should focus on the fundamental market parameters (such as relevant elasticities), nonmarket effects of MO (such as impacts on nutrition or health), and the dynamic implications of MO elimination or modification on price discovery, risk management options and use, and organizational arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Producer allotments are authorized and were used in the case of cranberries in the 2000 and 2001 crop years, but for Florida celery the allotment was nonbinding and the order was suspended in 1995. The marketing order for hops authorized allotments but was terminated in 1987. Currently, only Far West spearmint oil has a functional allotment program. Information on the performance of the FWSO may be found in Balagtas et al. (2006).

References

  • Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. J Econometrics 5:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston JM et al (1993) Restricting flow of almonds to export markets may raise profitsCalifornia. Agriculture 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • American Agricultural Economics Association (1986) Federal Milk Marketing Orders: A Review of Research on Their Economic Consequences. AAEA Task Force on Dairy Marketing Orders, Occasional Paper No. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster WJ, Jesse EV (1983) Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Orders. In: Armbruster W J, Henderson D R, Knutson R D (eds) Federal Marking Programs in Agriculture: Issues and Options, Interstate Printers and Publishers, Danville, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Babb EM (1989) Over-Order Payments in Federal Milk Marketing Orders, 1970-87. Food and Resource Economics Department Staff Paper 371, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagatas JV et al (2006) Cartel Pricing with Entry: the Experience of the Far West Marketing Order for Spearmint. AAEA Annual Meetings, May 2006, Providence, RI

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagatas JV, Sumner DA (2005) Dissipation of Regulatory Rents: How Milk Marketing Orders Made Milk Producers Worse Off. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, BM (1979) Post-Regulation Research: Milk Marketing Order Regulations. Amer J Agric Econ 61:779–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byma J, Tauer LW (2010) Exploring the Role of Managerial Ability in Influencing Dairy Farm Efficiency. Agric Res Econ Rev 39:505–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakir M, Balagtas JV (2010) Estimating the Market Power of U. S. Dairy Cooperatives in the Fluid Milk Market. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Food and Agriculture (2007) California and Federal Milk Marketing Orders: A Comparison. Dairy Marketing Branch DMB-SP-104, CDFA, May

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman HF, Pick D (1988) Marketing California-Arizona Lemons without Marketing Order Shipment Controls. Agribusiness 4:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfant JA, Sexton RJ (2002) Markeing Orders, Grading Errors, and Price Discrimination. Am J Agric Econ 84:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JV (1998) A Review of the US Grade A Milk Supply, Its Quality, Marketing and Pricing. Int J Dairy Tech 51:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard HH, Davis DE, LaFrance JT, Perloff JM (2010) Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers. App Econ Perspec Pol 32:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TL, Chavas JP (2001) An Interregional Analysis of Price Discrimination and Domestic Policy Reform in the U. S. Dairy Sector. Am J Agric Econ 83:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TL, Jesse EV (1995) Regional Effects of Selected Dairy Policy Options: Dairy IRCM Simulations. Marketing and Policy Briefing Paper No. 52, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropp B (2003) Dairy Cooperatives and Federal Milk Marketing Orders. 10th Annual Workshop for Dairy Economists and Policy Analysts, Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis CG, Dong D, Blayney DP, Owens A (2010) An Analysis of U.S. Household Dairy Demand. Economic Research Service, USDA

    Google Scholar 

  • Day L (May 15, 2007) Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, House Committee on Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyon MA (2001) The Effect of Elimination of Federal Milk Marketing Orders on Farm-level Markets: a Laboratory Experiment. Can J Agric Econ 49:353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erba EM, Novakovic AM (1995) The Evolution of Milk Pricing and Government Intervention in Dairy Markets. Department of Agricultural, Resource and Managerial Economics Extension Bulletin 95–05, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris PL (1960) Uniform Grades and Standards, Product Differentiation and Product Development. J Farm Econ 42:854–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (March 22, 2010), Marketing Order Regulating the Handling of Spearmint Oil Produced in the Far West; Salable Quantities and Allotment Percentages for the 2010–2011 Marketing Year. Doc 75 13445

    Google Scholar 

  • Filson D, Keen E, Fruits E, Borcherding T (2001) Market Power and Cartel Formation Theory and An Empirical Test. J LawEcon 44:465–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest HL (December 4, 1975) Remarks, at Conference on Milk Prices and the Market System. Community Nutrition Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • French BC (1988) Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Orders in the United States, 1937 – 1997, A Review. Acta Horiculturae 223 University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • French, BC, Matthews JL (1971) A Supply Response Model for Perennial Crops. Am J Agric Econ 53: 478–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French BC, Nuckton CF (1991) An Empirical Analysis of Economic Performance under the Marketing Order for Raisins. Am J Agric Econ 73:581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattuso, JL (1985) The High Cost and Low Returns of Farm Marketing Orders. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder #462, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Sumner D, Alston J, Brunke H, Acquaye AKA (2005) “Economic Consequences of Mandated Grading and Food Safety Assurance: Ex Ante Analysis of the Federal Marketing Order for California Pistachios.” University of California, Giannini Foundation Monograph, 46, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R (1999) Demand for California Agricultural Commodities, Update. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailu G, Goddard E, Jeffrey S (2005). Measuring Efficiency in Fruit and Vegetable Cooperatives with Heterogenous Technologies in Canada, AAEA Annual Meeting Selected Paper, Providence, RI

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, Brooks K (1985) Federal Price Programs for the American Dairy Industry—Issues and Alternatives. Food and Agriculture Committee and the National Planning Association, FAC Report #4; NPA Report #214, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosken D, O’Brien D, Scheffman D, Vita M (2002) Demand System Estimation and its Application To Horizontal Merger Analysis. In Harkrider J(ed.), “The Use of Econometrics in Antitrust,” American Bar Association Section on Antitrust, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito RA, Masson RT (1978) The Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk. J L Econ 21:33–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iraizoz B, Rapun M, Zabelata I (2003) Assessing the technical efficiency of horticultural production in Navarra, Spain. Agric Sys 78: 387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesse EV, Johnson AC Jr. (1981) Effectiveness of Federal Marketing Orders for Fruits and Vegetables, Economics and Statistics Service, Ag. Econ. Rept. 471, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse E, Cropp B (2004a) Federal Milk Marketing Order Pooling, Depooling, and Distant Pooling: Issues and Impacts. Department of Agricultural Economics Marketing and Policy Briefing Paper 85, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse E, Cropp B (2004b) Federal Milk Marketing Order Reform (Continued). Department of Agricultural Economics Marketing and Policy Briefing Paper 73, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse EV (2004) How Have Federal Milk Marketing Order Product Price Formulas Affected Milk Prices? Department of Agricultural Economics Marketing and Policy Briefing Paper 86, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HM, Liu DJ, Consignado T (2005) An Economic Analysis of California Raisin Export Promotion. In The Economics of Commodity Promotion Programs: Lessons from California, eds. Kaiser HM, Alston JM, Crespi JM, Sexton R J Peter Lang Publishing, New York, NY 209–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling JJ, Andersen MA (2004) Welfare Analysis and Policy Recommendations for the California Raisin Marketing Order. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Selected Paper, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard LJ (2000) Do Consumers Value Stable Prices? J Agribus 18:155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff SA, Plato GE (1995) Federal Marketing Orders and Federal Research and Promotion Programs: Background for 1995 Farm Legislation. USDA, Economic Research Service AER 707

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson CF, Stephenson MW (2010a) Analysis of Proposed Programs to Mitigate Price Volatility in the U.S. Dairy Industry. Project report for consortium of dairy industry organizations administered by the Milk Producers Council. Available at: http://dairy.wisc.com (accessed February 2, 2012)

  • Nicholson CF, Stephenson MW (2010b) Spatial Normative Values of U.S. Farm Milk in 2006. Report to Dairy Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA

    Google Scholar 

  • Novakovic AM (1995) Discussion of Eliminating Federal Milk Marketing Orders. Testimony presented to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry, Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Novakovic AM (2004) Do Federal Orders Still Help Dairy Farmers? Hoard’s Dairyman, p. 391

    Google Scholar 

  • Novakovic AM Boynton RD (1984) Do Changes in Farmer-First Handler Exchange Eliminate the Need for Government Intervention? Amer J Agric Econ 66:769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padberg DI, Hall C (1995) The Economic Rationale for Marketing Orders, San Joaquin Agric Law Rev 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel EJ (2005) Dynamic patterns of change in structure under different support policy regimes: an examination of U.S. dairy farming. M.S. thesis, Cornell University

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers NJ (1991) Effects of Marketing Order Prorate Suspensions on California-Arizona Navel Oranges, Agribus 7:203–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Perloff JM, Zusman P (1987) The Food Marketing System: The Relevance of Economic Efficiency Measures. In Economic Efficiency in Agricultural and Food Marketing, R.L. Kilmer and W.J. Armbruster, eds. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Perloff J, Zusman P (1985) The Food Marketing System: The Relevance of Economic Efficiency Measures., Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics Working Paper No. 369 University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed AJ, Clark JS (2000) Structural Change and Competition in Seven U. S. Food Markets. Economic Research Service Tech Bull 1881, USDA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitone TL, Sexton RJ (2010) Impacts of Minimum Quality Standards Imposed Through Marketing Orders or Related Producer Organizations. Amer J Agric Econ 92:176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiek WA (1994) Regional Impacts of Federal Milk Marketing Order Policy Alternatives. Agric Res Econ Rev 23:207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkwiler JS Pagoulatos E (1980) A Model of Weekly Price Discovery for Florida Celery. S J Agric Econ 12:113–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson MW (2003) Dairy Programs and the Assumption of Competitive Equilibrium. 10th Annual Workshop for Dairy Economists and Policy Analysts, Memphis, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner DA (1999) Domestic Price Regulations and Trade Policy: Milk Marketing Orders in the United States. Can J Agric Econ 47:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauer LW, Belbase K (1987) Technical Efficiency of New York Dairy Farms. NE J Agri Econ 16:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MR (July 29, 2009) “The Safety of Fresh Produce”, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor TG, Kilmer RL (1988) An Analysis of Market Structure and Pricing in the Florida Celery Industry. S J Agric Econ 20:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson GD, Lyon CC (1989) Marketing Order Impacts on Farm-Retail Price Spreads: The Suspension of Prorates on California-Arizona Navel Oranges. Am J Agric Econ 71:647–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thraen C (2003) Milk and Dairy Product Price Risk Management in a Non-Federal Milk Market Order Environment: A Concept Paper. 10th Annual Workshop for Dairy Economists and Policy Analysts, Memphis, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend-Zellner N (1961) The Effect of Marketing Orders on Market Structures and Some Consequent Market Developments. J Farm Econ 43:1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States General Accounting Office (1985) The Role of Marketing Orders in Establishing and Maintaining Orderly Marketing Conditions. GAO/FCED-85-57

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2010) “Report to Congress: Specialty Crop Report” Federal Crop Insurance Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2008) “USDA Announces Final Rule to Establish a Dairy Forward Pricing Program.” Program Announcement, October 31, 2008. Agricultural Marketing Service Release 128–08

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1982) “Guidelines For Fruit, Vegetable and Specialty Crop Marketing Orders.” January 25, 1982. Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. Available at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&navID=LinktoCurrentFruitandVegetableMarketingOrders&rightNav1=LinktoCurrentFruitandVegetableMarketingOrders&topNav=&leftNav=&page=FVMarketingOrderIndex&resultType=&acct=fvmktord (accessed September 2, 2010)

  • USDA (1981) A Review of Federal Marketing Orders for Fruits, Vegetables and Specialty crops: Economic Efficiency and Welfare Implications. Agricultural Marketing ServiceAgric Econ Rep 477

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilos RA, McCalla AF (2009) “The Role of Regional Trade Agreements in Trade Liberalization.” University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Resource Economics UPDATE 12 4. Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon RN, VanSickle JJ (2002) The Expected Cost of an Income Support Program for Processing Oranges. International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center, University of Florida Policy Brief 01-5, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainsville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepp G, Powers N (1990) Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Orders. National Food Rev. Economic Research Service, USDA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mechel Paggi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paggi, M., Nicholson, C.F. (2013). Federal and State Marketing Orders. In: Armbruster, W., Knutson, R. (eds) US Programs Affecting Food and Agricultural Marketing. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 38. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4930-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4930-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4929-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4930-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics