Skip to main content

Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Male

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1166 Accesses

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy will be covered in this chapter. A stepwise approach is covered with emphasis on important steps as well as tips and tricks to avoid complications. The combined experience of the authors dates back to 2005 when they began applying robotic techniques in the management of invasive bladder cancer. Perioperative and postoperative care is covered in this chapter providing the reader a foundation for developing a clinical pathway of their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol. 1992;148:1140–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kauffman EC, Ng CK, Lee MM, et al. Critical analysis of complications after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with identification of preoperative and operative risk factors. BJU Int. 2009;105:520–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, et al. Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standarized reporting system. Urology. 2011;77:357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical adn pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol. 2010;183:510–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, et al. Defining morbidity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2011;59:213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:274–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O, et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol. 2007;178:2308–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadjizacharia P, Stein JP, Cai J, Miranda G. The impact of positive soft tissue surgical margins following radical cystectomy for high-grade, invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2009;27:33–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. J Urol. 2010;184:87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Wiklund NP. Robotic cystectomy. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:89–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Novara G, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients. J Urol. 2010;183:2165–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thuroff JW, Wolf HK. Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int. 2000;85:817–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K. Radical cystectomy: extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. J Urol. 1998;160:2015–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, et al. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report. J Urol. 2004;171:1823–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2781–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int. 2011;107:642–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis JW, Gaston K, Anderson R, et al. Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection. J Urol. 2010;185:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lavery HJ, Martinez-Suarez HJ, Abaza R. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield. BJU Int. 2011;107:1802–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol. 2010;57:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pruthi RS, Wallen EM. Is robotic radical cystectomy an appropriate treatment for bladder cancer? Short-term oncologic and clinical follow-up in 50 consecutive patients. Urology. 2008;72:617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dasgupta P, Rimington P, Murphy D, et al. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy: short to medium term oncologic and functional outcomes. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1709–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Pacelli A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: intermediate survival results at a mean follow-up of 25 months. BJU Int. 2010;105:1706–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kauffman EC, Ng CK, Lee MM, et al. Early oncologic outcomes for bladder urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;107:628–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mmeje CO, Nunez-Nateras R, Nielsen ME, et al. Oncologic outcomes for lymph node-positive urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robot assisted radical cystectomy: with mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Urol Oncol. In press 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik P. Castle M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

A completed extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and exposure of the hypogastric vessels and pedicles (MP4 15371 kb)

Ureteral dissection and clipping (MP4 72768 kb)

Initial steps of the radical cystectomy portion of the procedure (MP4 40500 kb)

Management of the bladder pedicles (MP4 42616 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Castle, E.P., Pruthi, R.S. (2014). Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Male. In: Castle, E., Pruthi, R. (eds) Robotic Surgery of the Bladder. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4906-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4906-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4905-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4906-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics