Abstract
The purpose of this commentary is to make explicit the feminist theories that are implicit in most chapters in this volume and to encourage more explicit future use of feminist theories. New insights can be gained into gender research by understanding the different feminist theories underlying such research. Feminist theories provide frameworks that increase our understanding of the complex meanings and significance of material culture. Feminist theories provide information about cultural ideologies, structures, institutions, habitus, and processes that support, enforce, or diminish patriarchy. Thus, feminist theories can provide the insight that a specific historical event or process is not unusual or unique but is in fact part of a long-term patriarchal structure or process. Feminist theories can also provide insights into the methods used by reformers to diminish male domination. Feminist theories are substantiated and enlarged by historic case studies in book chapters that provide details revealing how theories were operationalized in actual practice. In addition, knowledge of feminist theories brings to light contributions to those theories made by some chapters. Perhaps most importantly, knowledge of feminist theories enlarges the questions about gender that we can consider researching from material and historical perspectives. Feminist research asking these new questions provides important historical context for archaeological gender research. Feminist theories are explicitly applied in chapters in this volume by Joyce Clements, Elizabeth Arwill-Nordbladh, and Suzanne Spencer-Wood.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, S. (1987). The arts and crafts movement. New York: Chartwell.
Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1–19). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Anderson, B. S., & Zinsser, J. P. (1988). A history of their own: Women in Europe from prehistory to the present (Vol. II). New York: Harper and Row.
Babits, L. (1994). Will the real housewife please stand up: Feminists, campfollowers, and housewives on military sites. Paper presented at the Society for Historical Archaeology 27th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Vancouver, 1/5-9.
Beatty, B. (2000). “The Letter Killeth”: Americanization and multi-cultural education in kindergartens in the US 1856–1920. In R. L. Wollons (Ed.), Kindergartens and cultures: The global diffusion of an idea (pp. 42–58). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Breen, T. H. (1988). Baubles of Britain: The American and consumer revolutions of the eighteenth century. Past and Present, 119, 73–104.
Brewer, P. (2000). From fireplace to cookstove: Technology and the domestic ideal in America. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Cantwell, A.-M., & Wall, D. D. Z. (2011). Engendering New Netherland: Implications for interpreting early colonial archaeology. Archaeologies, 7(1), 121–154.
Coleman, P. J. (1987). Progressivism and the world of reform: New Zealand and the origins of the American welfare state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Collins, G. (2003). America’s women: 400 years of dolls, drudges, helpmates, and heroines. New York: Harper Collins.
Coontz, S. (1991). The social origins of private life. London: Verso, New Left Books.
Cott, N. F. (1977). The bonds of womanhood: “Woman’s Sphere” in New England 1780–1835. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
de Beauvoir, S. (1953). The second sex. (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). New York: Knopf. (Originally published 1949 in French).
De Cunzo, L. A. (2004). A historical archaeology of delaware: People, contexts and the cultures of agriculture. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Deetz, J. F. (1988). Material culture and worldview in colonial Anglo-America. In M. P. Leone & P. B. Potter Jr. (Eds.), The recovery of meaning: Historical archaeology in the eastern United States (pp. 219–234). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Degler, C. N. (1980). At odds: Women and the family in America from the Revolution to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Demos, J. (1970). “A Little Commonwealth.” Family life in Plymouth Colony. London: Oxford University Press.
Donovan, J. (2001). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions. 3rd Ed. New York: Continuum.
Deutsch, S. (2000). Women and the city: Gender, space and power in Boston 1870–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devens, C. (1991). Gender and colonization in Native Canadian communities: Examining the historical record. In D. Walde & N. D. willows (Eds.), The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd [1989] Annual Chacmool Conference (pp. 510–14). Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Dubois, E. C. (1998). Woman suffrage and women’s rights. New York: New York University Press.
Eggleston, E. (1875, November). The child garden. Scribner’s Monthly, an Illustrated Magazine for the People, XI(1), 615–629.
Engels, F. (1972). The origin of the family, private property, and the state. New York: International Publishers.
Fraser, A. (1984). Weaker vessel. New York: Knopf.
Friedan, B. (1993). The fountain of age. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Frink, L. (2005). Gender and the hide production process in colonial western Alaska. In L. Frink & K. Weedman (Eds.), Gender and hide production (pp. 89–105). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Fuller, M. (1971). Woman in the nineteenth century. With an introduction by Bernard Rosenthal. New York: W.W. Norton. (Reprint of 1855 edition).
Galle, J. E., & Young, A. L. (Eds.). (2004). Engendering African American archaeology: A southern perspective. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Gibb, J. G., & King, J. A. (1991). Gender, activity areas, and homelots in the 19th century Chesapeake region. Historical Archaeology, 25(4), 109–131.
Goodwin, L. B. R. (1999). An archaeology of manners: The polite world of the merchant elite of colonial Massachusetts. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Gordon, L. (2006). Internal colonialism and gender. In A. L. Stoler (Ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of intimacy in North American history (pp. 427–452). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hayden, D. M (1981). The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Helsinger, E. K., Sheets, R. L., Veeder, W. (1983). “The Woman Question.” Society and literature in Britain and American 1837–1883. Volume 2. Social Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hennessay, R., & Ingraham, C. (Eds.). (1997). Materialist feminism: A reader in class, difference, and women’s lives. New York: Routledge.
Hobson, B. M. (1987). Uneasy virtue: The politics of prostitution and the American reform tradition. New York: Basic books.
Hong, J. (2006). Marital Rape. In Paul Finkelman, Gabriel J. Chin, Davison M. Douglas, Melvin I. Urofsky, Mary L. Volcansek, (Eds.) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties, Vol. I (pp. 960–1). New York: Routledge.
Hohenegger, B. (2006). Liquid Jade: The story of tea from east to west. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Holliman, S. E. (2005). Hideworking and changes in women’s status among the Arikara 1700–1862. In L. Frink & K. Weedman (Eds.), Gender and hide production (pp. 77–89). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Hymowitz, C., & Weissman, M. (1978). A history of women in America: From founding mothers to feminists – How women shaped the life and culture of America. New York: Bantam Books.
Jackson, S. M. (Forthcoming). Reforming bodies: Self-governance, anxiety, and Cape colonial architecture in South Africa, 1665–1860. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.) Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public. New York: Springer.
Jensen, J. M. (1986). Loosening the bonds: Mid-Atlantic farm women 1750–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kwolek-Folland, A. (2002). Incorporating women: A history of women & business in the United States. New York: Palgrave.
Leacock, E., Safa, H. I. Editors (1986). Women’s work: Development and the division of labor by gender. South Hadley MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Lees, S. (2000). Marital rape and marital murder. In Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice. In J. Hanmer & C. Itzin (Eds.) Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice. A reader (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge.
Lightfoot, K. G. (2005). Indians, missionaries and merchants: The legacy of colonial encounters on the California frontiers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Little, B. J. (1994). “She Was…an Example to Her Sex”: Possibilities for a feminist historical archaeology. In P. A. Shackel & B. J. Little (Eds.), Historical archaeology of the Chesapeake (pp. 189–204). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Lloyd, T. (1971). Suffragettes international: The worldwide campaign for women’s rights. New York: American Heritage Press.
Lorber, J. (2001) Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Macdonald, A. L. (1992). Feminine ingenuity: Women and invention in America. New York: Ballantine Books.
Martin, A. S. (1994). “Fashionable Sugar dishes, Latest Fashion Ware”: The Creamware revolution in the eighteenth century Chesapeake. In P. A. Shackel & B. J. Little (Eds.), Historical archaeology of the Chesapeake (pp. 169–187). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Martin, A. S. (2006). Ribbons of desire: Gendered stories in the world of goods, in gender, taste, and material culture in Britain and America in the long eighteenth-century. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Martin, A. S. (2008). Buying into the world of goods, early consumers in Backcountry Virginia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
Matthaei, J. A. (1982). An economic history of women in America: Women’s work, the sexual division of labor, and the development of capitalism. New York: Schoken Books.
Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics: A surprising examination of society’s most arbitrary folly. Garden City NJ: Doubleday.
Moxham, R. (2003). Tea: Addiction, exploitation and Empire. New York: Carroll and Graf.
Nelson, S. M. (2006). The professional is political. In P. Geller & M. Stockett (Eds.), Feminist anthropology, past, present and future (pp. 156–166). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Paynter, R., McGuire, R.H. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Material culture, domination, and resistance. In R.H. McGuire and P. Paynter (Eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Pollitt, K. (2010). Abraham Lincoln, Meet Client #9. The Nation, 290(25), 9.
Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born. New York: Norton.
Robertson, P. (1982). An experience of women: Pattern and change in nineteenth-century Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Ronda, B. A. (1999). Elizabeth Palmer Peabody: A reformer on her own terms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rothschild, N. A. (2003). Colonial encounters in a Native American landscape. The Spanish and Dutch in North America. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.
Rotman, D. L. (Forthcoming). Domestic production for public markets: The Arts and Crafts Movement in Deerfield, Massachusetts (c.1850–1911). In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.) Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public. New York: Springer.
Scott, E. M. (1994). Through the lens of gender: Archaeology, inequality and “Those of Little Note”. In E. M. Scott (Ed.),”Those of ‘Little Note:’ Gender, race and class in historical archaeology (pp. 3–27). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1992). Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
Shields, D. S. (1997). Civil tongues and polite letters in British America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Silliman, S. W. (2005). Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity 70(1), 55–74.
Smiles, S. (1895). Josiah Wedgewood, F.R.S.: His personal history. New York: Harper & Bros.
Smith, S. O. (1990). Fair winds, fair gender, fair due. In T. L. Carrell (Ed.), Underwater archaeology Proceedings from the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference (pp. 38–40). Tucson, AZ: Society for Historical Archaeology.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1987). A survey of domestic reform movement sites in Boston and Cambridge, c. 1865–1905. Historical Archaeology, 21(2), 7–36.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991a). Towards a feminist historical archaeology of the construction of gender. In D. Walde & N. D. Willows (Eds.), The archaeology of gender: Proceedings of the 22nd [1989] Chacmool Conference (pp. 234–244). Calgary: U. of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991b). Toward an historical archaeology of materialistic domestic reform. In R. H. McGuire & R. Paynter (Eds.), The archaeology of inequality (pp. 231–287). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1992). A feminist program for a non-sexist archaeology. In L. Wandsnider (Ed.), Quandaries and quests: Visions of archaeology’s future (pp. 98–113). Carbondale IL: Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 20.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994). Diversity in 19th century domestic reform: Relationships among classes and ethnic groups. In E. M. Scott (Ed.), Those ‘Of Little Note’: Gender, race and class in historical archaeology (pp. 175–209). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1995). Toward the further development of feminist historical archaeology. World Archaeological Bulletin, 7, 118–136.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1996). Feminist historical archaeology and the transformation of American culture by domestic reform movements, 1840–1925. In L. A. De Cunzo & B. L. Herman (Eds.), Historical archaeology and the study of American culture (pp. 397–446). Knoxville: Winterthur Museum and University of Tennessee Press.
Spencer-Wood, S.M. (1997). Feminist inclusive theory: Crossing boundaries in theory and practice. Keynote Paper invited for “Feminism on the Frontier.” The “4th Australian Women In Archaeology Conference,” Cairns, Australia, July 3–5.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999a). The World Their Household. Changing meanings of the domestic sphere in the nineteenth century. In P. M. Allison (Ed.), The archaeology of household activities: Gender ideologies, domestic spaces and material culture (pp. 162–189). London: Routledge.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999b). The formation of Ethnic-American identities: Jewish communities in Boston. In P. P. A. Funari, M. Hall, & S. Jones (Eds.), Historical archaeology: Back from the edge (pp. 284–307). London: Routledge.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999c). Gendering power. In T. L. Sweely (Ed.), Manifesting power: Gender and the interpretation of power in archaeology (pp. 175–183). London: Routledge.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002). Utopian visions and architectural designs of turn-of-the-century Social Settlements. In L. Shapiro & R. Zorach (Eds.), Embodied utopias: Gender, social change and the modern metropolis (pp. 116–32). London: Routledge.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2003). Gendering the creation of green urban landscapes in America at the turn of the century. In D. L. Rotman & E.-R. Savulis (Eds.), Shared spaces and divided places: Material dimensions of gender relations and the American historical landscape (pp. 24–62). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2004). A historic pay-for-housework community household: The Cambridge Cooperative Housekeeping Society. In K. Barrile & J. Brandon (Eds.), Household chores and household choices: Theorizing the domestic sphere in historical archaeology (pp. 138–158). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2006). A feminist theoretical approach to the historical archaeology of utopian communities. Historical Archaeology, 40(1), 152–185.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2007). Feminist theory and gender research in historical archaeology. In S. M. Nelson (Ed.), Women in antiquity: Theoretical approaches to gender and archaeology (pp. 29–75). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2010). Gendered power dynamics between religious sects, ethnic groups, and classes in Jewish communities on greater Boston’s landscape at the turn of the century. In S. Baugher & S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.s), The archaeology and preservation of gendered landscapes (pp. 189–233). New York: Springer.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (Forthcoming). Western gender transformations from the 18th century to the early 20th century: Combining the domestic and public spheres. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.), Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public. New York: Springer.
Stansell, C. (1986). City of women: Sex and class in New York 1789–1860. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Starbuck, D. R. (1994). The identification of gender at northern military sites of the late eighteenth century. In E. M. Scott (Ed.), Those of ‘Little Note’: Gender, race and class in historical archaeology (pp. 115–129). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Stine, L. F. (1991). Early 20th century gender roles: Perceptions from the farm. In D. Walde & N. D. Willows (Eds.), The archaeology of gender: Proceedings of the 22nd [1989] Annual Chacmool Conference (pp. 496–501). Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Verbrugge, M. H. (1988). Able-bodied womanhood: Personal health and social change in nineteenth-century Boston. New York: Oxford University Press.
Voss, B. L. (2000). Colonial sex: Archaeology, structured space and sexuality in Alta California’s Spanish-colonial missions. In R. A. Schmidt & B. L. Voss (Eds.), Archaeologies of sexuality (pp. 35–62). London: Routledge.
Voss, B. L. (2008). The archaeology of ethnogenesis: Race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wall, D. D. Z. (1994). The archaeology of gender: Separating the spheres in urban America. New York: Plenum.
Wertheimer, B. M. (1977). We were there: The story of working women in America. New York: Pantheon Books.
Wiebé, E. (1896). Quarter century edition of the paradise of childhood, including a life of Friedrich Froebel by Henry W. Blake. Springfield, MA: Milton Bradley Co.
Yamin, R. (2001). Alternative narratives: Respectability at New York’s five points. In A. Mayne & T. Murray (Eds.), The archaeology of urban landscapes: Explorations in Slumland (pp. 154–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yentsch, A. E. (1991). The symbolic divisions of pottery: Sex-related attributes of English and Anglo-American household pots. In R. H. McGuire & P. Paynter (Eds.), The archaeology of inequality (pp. 192–230). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Yentsch, A. E. (2011). A teapot, a house, or both? The material possessions of Irish women’s California Assemblages. Archaeologies, 7(1), 170–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spencer-Wood, S.M. (2013). Commentary: How Feminist Theories Increase Our Understanding of Processes of Gender Transformation. In: Spencer-Wood, S. (eds) Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4863-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4863-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4862-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4863-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)