Abstract
This edited volume examines and denaturalizes the “separate-spheres” gender system that historians have identified as persisting at least from the Greek, Roman, and Christian empires into modern times in Western cultures (Anderson and Zinsser 1988: xiii–xiv, 96–99, 144; Matthaei 1982: 29–31; Donovan 2001: 19). It is important to understand the “separate-spheres” ideology, identities, roles, and practices because this gender system is the deepest historical context for this volume. The dualistic ideology posits that men belong in the public sphere while women are innately inclined to engaging in private domestic pursuits (Spencer-Wood 1991a: 237). The association of women with the domestic sphere of housework, mothering, and household activities has been considered a natural extension of women’s biological roles in childbirth and breast feeding. According to the “separate-spheres” ideology, women are genetically engineered to enjoy and excel at caring for the home and mothering children, while men are best at conducting public activities such as agricultural fieldwork, wars, governments, and capitalist businesses (Robertson 1982: 21, 25–28; Matthaei 1982: 110–111). The asymmetrical power dynamics in the “separate-spheres” gender system are addressed in Spencer-Wood’s chapter in this volume.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. S., & Zinsser, J. P. (1988). A history of their own: Women in Europe from prehistory to the present (Vol. II). New York: Harper and Row.
Babits, L. (1994, January 5–9). Will the real housewife please stand up: Feminists, camp followers and housewives on military sites. Paper presented at the Society for Historical Archaeology 27th Annual Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Vancouver.
Baenninger, M. A., & Newcombe, N. (2002). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. In E. L. Paul (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in sex and gender (2nd ed., pp. 97–100). Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
Camp, S. L. (Forthcoming). From reform to repatriation: Gendering an Americanization movement in early twentieth century California. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.), Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public.
Cantwell, A.-M., & Wall, D. D. Z. (2011). Engendering New Netherland: Implications for interpreting early colonial societies. In S. M. Spencer-Wood, L. Smith (Eds.), Archaeologies (special issue: the impact of feminist theories on archaeology), 7(1), 121–154.
Collins, G. (2003). America’s women: 400 year of dolls, drudges,helpmates and heroines. New York: Harper Perennial.
De Cunzo, L. A. (2001). On reforming the “fallen” and beyond: Transforming continuity at the Magdalen Society of Philadelphia, 1845–1916. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 5(1), 19–45.
De Cunzo, L. A. (2004). A historical archaeology of Delaware: People, contexts and the cultures of agriculture. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Delle, J. A. (2000). Gender, power, and space: Negotiating social relations under slavery on coffee plantations in Jamaica 1790–1834. In J. A. Delle, S. A. Mrozowski, & R. Paynter (Eds.), Lines that divide: Historical archaeologies of race, class, and gender (pp. 168–205). University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville.
Deutsch, S. (2000). Women and the city: Gender, space and power in Boston 1870–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donovan, J. (2001). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions (3rd ed.). New York: Continuum.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Fraser, A. (1984). Weaker vessel. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Gordon, L. (2006). Internal colonialism and gender. In A. L. Stoler (Ed.), Haunted by empire: Geographies of intimacy in North American history (pp. 427–452). Durham: Duke University Press.
Hayden, D. (1981). The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hobson, B. M. (1990). Uneasy virtue: The politics of prostitution and the American reform tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hymowitz, C., & Weissman, M. (1978). A history of women in America: From founding mothers to feminists—how women shaped the life and culture of America. New York: Bantam Books.
Jensen, J. M. (1986). Loosening the bonds: Mid-Atlantic farm women 1750–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kwolek-Folland, A. (2002). Incorporating women: A history of women & business in the United States. New York: Palgrave.
Little, B. J. (1994). “She was … an example to her sex”: Possibilities for a feminist historical archaeology. In P. A. Shackel & B. J. Little (Eds.), Historical archaeology of the Chesapeake (pp. 189–204). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. Signs, 16(3), 485–501.
Martin, A. S. (1994). “Fashionable Sugar Dishes, Latest Fashion Ware”: the Creamware Revolution in the Eighteenth Century Chesapeake. In P. A. Shackel & B. J. Little (Eds.), Historical archaeology of the Chesapeake (pp. 169–187). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Matthaei, J. A. (1982). An economic history of women in America: Women’s work, the sexual division of labor, and the development of capitalism. New York: Schocken Books.
Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Orser, Charles, E., Jr. (2007). The archaeology of race and racialization in historic America. Gainsville: University Press of Florida. Blackwell.
Paynter, R., & McGuire, R. H. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Material culture, domination, and resistance. In R. H. McGuire & R. Paynter (Eds.), The archaeology of inequality (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Praetzellis, M. (Forthcoming). “Sisters across the bay,” Archaeology and the influence of two late nineteenth-century free kindergartens in Northern California. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.), Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public.
Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist methods in social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, P. (1982). An Experience of women: Pattern and change in nineteenth-century Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rotman, D. L. (2006). Separate spheres? Beyond the dichotomies of domesticity. Current Anthropology, 47(4), 666–674.
Rotman, D. (Forthcoming). Domestic production for public markets: The Arts and Crafts Movement in Deerfield, Massachusetts, c.1850–c.1911. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.), Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public.
Scott, E. M. (1994). Through the lens of gender: Archaeology, inequality and “Those of Little Note”. In E. M. Scott (Ed.), ‘Those of ‘Little Note: ’ Gender, race and class in historical archaeology (pp. 3–27). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Seifert, D. J. (1991). Introduction. In D. J. Seifert (Ed.), Gender in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology, 25(4), 1–5.
Silliman, S. W. (2005). Culture contact or colonialism? challenges in the archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity, 70(1), 55–74.
Smith, S. O. (1990). Fair winds, fair gender, fair due. In T. L. Carrell (Ed.), Underwater Archaeology Proceedings from the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference (pp. 38–40). Tucson, AZ: Society for Historical Archaeology.
Spain, D. (2001). How women saved the city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1987). A survey of domestic reform movement sites in Boston and Cambridge, c. 1865–1905. Historical Archaeology 21(2), 7–36.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991a). Towards a feminist historical archaeology of the construction of gender. In D. Walde & N. D. Willows (Eds.), The archaeology of gender: Proceedings of the 22nd [1989] Chacmool Conference (pp. 234–244). Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991b). Toward an historical archaeology of materialistic domestic reform. In R. H. McGuire & R. Paynter (Eds.), The archaeology of inequality (pp. 231–287). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1992). A feminist program for a non-sexist archaeology. In L. A. Wandsnider (Eds.), Quandaries and quests: Visions of archaeology’s future, (pp. 98–113). Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 20, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994). Diversity in 19th century domestic reform: Relationships among classes and ethnic groups. In E. M. Scott (Ed.), Those ‘of little note: ’ Gender, race and class in historical archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1995). Toward the further development of feminist historical archaeology. 1993 World Archaeological Bulletin, 7, 118–36.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1996). Feminist historical archaeology and the transformation of American culture by domestic reform movements, 1840–1925. In L. A. De Cunzo & B. L. Herman (Eds.), Historical archaeology and the study of American culture (pp. 397–446). Knoxville: Winterthur Museum and University of Tennessee Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999). The formation of Ethnic-American identities: Jewish communities in Boston. In P. J. Ucko (Series Ed.), & P. P. A. Funari, M. Hall, & S. Jones (Vol. Eds.), Historical archaeology: Back from the edge (pp. 284–307). One World Archaeology Series. Routledge: London.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002). Utopian visions and architectural designs of turn-of-the-century social settlements. In A. Bingaman, L. Shapiro, & R. Zorach (Eds.), Embodied utopias: Gender, social change and the modern metropolis (pp. 116–132). London: Routledge.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2003). Gendering the creation of green urban landscapes in America at the turn of the century. In D. L. Rotman & E. Savulis (Eds.), Shared spaces and divided places. Material dimensions of gender relations and the American historical landscape (pp. 24–61). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2004). A historic pay-for-housework community household: The Cambridge cooperative housekeeping society. In K. S. Barile & J. C. Brandon (Eds.), Household chores and household choices: Theorizing the domestic sphere in historical archaeology (pp. 138–158). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (Forthcoming). Western gender transformations from the eighteenth century to the early twentieth century: Combining the domestic and public spheres. In S. M. Spencer-Wood (Ed.), Historical and archaeological perspectives on gender transformations: From private to public.
Stansell, C. (1986). City of women: Sex and class in New York 1789–1860. New York: Knopf.
Starbuck, David R. (1994). The Identification of Gender at Northern Military Sites of the Late Eighteenth Century. In “Those of Little Note”: Gender, race and class in historical archaeology, edited by Elizabeth M.Scott, 115–29. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Stine, L. F. (1991). Early 20th century gender roles: Perceptions from the farm. In D. Walde & N. D. Willows (Eds.), The archaeology of gender: Proceedings of the 22nd [1989] Annual Chacmool Conference (pp. 496–501). Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
Stoler, A. L. (2001). Tense and tender ties: The politics of comparison in North American history and (post) colonial studies. Journal of American History, 88, 829–865.
Stoler, A. L. (Ed.). (2006). Haunted by empire: Geographies of intimacy in North American history. Durham: Duke University Press.
Strasser, S. (1982). Never done: A history of American housework. New York: Pantheon.
Van Kirk, S. (1983). “Many tender ties”: Women in fur-trade society in Western Canada, 1670–1870. Winnipeg: Watson and Dwyer.
Wall, D. D. Z. (1994). The archaeology of gender: Separating the spheres in urban America. New York: Plenum.
Wylie, A. (1991). Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In J. M. Gero & M. W. Conkey (Eds.), Engendering archaeology: Women and prehistory (pp. 31–54). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Yamin, R. (2001). Alternative narratives: Respectability at New York’s five points. In A. Mayne & T. Murray (Eds.), The archaeology of urban landscapes: Explorations in Slumland (pp. 154–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yentsch, A. E. (1991). Engendering visible and invisible ceramic artifacts, especially dairy vessels. Historical Archaeology, 25(4), 17–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spencer-Wood, S.M., Camp, S.L. (2013). Introduction to Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations: From Private to Public. In: Spencer-Wood, S. (eds) Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4863-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4863-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4862-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4863-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)