Abstract
Attachment theory and psychoanalytic approaches to child development emerged from common ground: a mistrust of existing ideas and a wish to know how the physical and caregiving environments interact with psychological development. These orientations developed in different contexts with disparate methodologies and emphases, and were considered to be incompatible by many clinicians and researchers. Yet, they share fundamental underpinnings and goals, and apparent incompatibilities are often the result of misunderstood aspects of each paradigm. Renewed interest in understanding how these theoretical orientations can together illuminate aspects of developmental processes is building. John Bowlby, with his emphasis on real events in the infant’s life, and Margaret Mahler, with her focus on examining early interactions in situ were revolutionary when they prioritized human observation. Both attachment theory and separation–individuation theory promote greater understanding of the interplay between universal developmental tasks and individual circumstances over the course of development, with an additional emphasis of the impact of early events and experiences over the lifespan. This chapter provides an overview of points of convergence and divergence between attachment theory and psychoanalytic theories of child development, with a particular emphasis on separation–individuation theory. The chapter concludes with a case study illustrating how a combined approach leads to a more comprehensive understanding of early development and its reverberations throughout life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the mother child relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1025.
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bartholomew, K. (1993). From childhood to adult relationships: Attachment theory and research. Learning about relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Learning about relationships, understanding relationship processes (Vol. 2) (pp. 30–62). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Beebe, B. (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother-infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60, 7–46.
Beebe, B., & Jaffee, J. (2011). Description of the project: A longitudinal prevention project for mothers pregnant and widowed in the World Trade Center tragedy of September 11, 2001, and their young children. Journal of Infant, Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 10, 156–169.
Bergman, A., & Fahey, M. (2005). Observations and representations of the earliest relationship: A view from separation-individuation and attachment. In S. Akhtar & H. Blum (Eds.), The language of emotions: Development, psychopathology, and technique (pp. 139–150). New York: Jason Aronson.
Bergman, A., & Harpaz-Rotem, I. (2004). Revisiting rapprochement in light of contemporary developmental theories. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 555–569.
Blom, I. (2009). A longitudinal study evaluating early observations and representations of relationships: Separation individuation theory and attachment theory in a qualitative approach (Doctoral dissertation). The New School for Social Research, New York, NY.
Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162–186.
Blum, H. (2004). Separation-individuation theory and attachment theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 535–553.
Bowlby, J. (1939). Evacuation of small children [Letter to the editor]. The British Medical Journal, December, 1202.
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Routledge.
Bowlby, J., & Robertson, J. (1952). A two-year-old goes to the hospital. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 7, 82–94.
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28, 759–775.
Burgner, M., & Edgecumbe, R. (1972). Some problems in the conceptualization of early object relationships—Part II: the concept of object constancy. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 315–333.
Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 3–20). New York: Guildford.
Coates, S. W. (2004). John Bowlby and Margaret S. Mahler: Their lives and theories. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 571–601.
Colarusso, C. (2000). Separation-Individuation phenomena in adulthood: General concepts and the fifth individuation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1467–1489.
Colaruso, C. (1992). Child and adult development: A psychoanalytic introduction for clinicians. New York: Springer.
Fonagy, P. (1999). Points of contact and divergence between psychoanalytic and attachment theories: Is psychoanalytic theory truly different? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 448–480.
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2007). The rooting of the mind in the body: New links between attachment theory and psychoanalytic thought. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 411–456.
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., & Steele, H. (1991). Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant-mother interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 62, 891–905.
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.
Fraiberg, S. (1969). Libidinal object constancy and mental representation. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 24, 9–47.
Freud, A. (1960). Discussion of Dr. John Bowlby’s paper. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15, 53–62.
Freud, A. (1971). The infantile neurosis—Genetic and dynamic considerations. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 79–90.
Gergely, G. (2000). Reapproaching Mahler: New perspectives on normal autism, symbiosis, splitting and libidinal object constancy from cognitive developmental theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1197–1228.
Gilmore, K. (1990). A secure base. Parent-child attachment and healthy human development: By John Bowlby. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59, 494–498.
Hartmann, H. (1952). Essays on ego psychology. New York: International University Press.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 511–524.
Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. In J. Cassidy and P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 395–433). New York: Guilford.
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2004). Attachment, evolution and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford.
Kobak, R. (1999). Separation and the emotional dynamics of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 88–105). New York: Guilford.
Koulomzin, M., Beebe, B., Anderson, S., Jaffe, J., Feldstein, S., & Crown, C. (2002). Infant gaze, head, face and self-touch at 4 months differentiate secure vs. avoidant attachment at 1 year: A microanalytic approach. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 3–24.
Kramer, S. (1992). Nonverbal manifestations of unresolved separation-individuation in adult psychopathology. In S. Kramer & S. Akhtar (Eds.), When the body speaks: Psychological meanings in kinetic cues (pp. 1–19). Northvale: Jason Aronson.
Kris, M., & Ritvo, S. (1983). Parents and siblings—Their mutual influences. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38, 311–324.
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1991). Rapprochement or approchement: Mahler’s theory reconsidered from the vantage point of recent research on early attachment relationships. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 8, 1–23.
Mahler, M. S. (1967). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 740–763.
Mahler, M. S. (1968). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes, Vol. 1: Infantile psychosis. Madison: International Universities Press.
Mahler, M. S. (1972a). On the first three subphases of the separation-individuation process. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 53, 333–338.
Mahler, M. S. (1972b). The rapprochement subphase of the separation-individuation process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 41, 487–506.
Mahler, M. S. (1986a). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. In P. Buckley (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations (pp. 200–221). New York: New York University Press.
Mahler, M. S. (1986b). On the first three subphases of the separation-individuation process. In P. Buckley (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations (pp. 222–232). New York: New York University Press.
Mahler, M. S., & Furer, M. (1963). Certain aspects of the separation-individuation phase. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 32, 1–14.
Mahler, M. S., & Furer, M. (1968). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International University Press.
Mahler, M. S., & McDevitt, J. (1980). The separation-individuation process and identity formation. In S.I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock (Eds.), The course of life: Psychoanalytic contributions toward understanding personality development (pp. 395–406). Bethesda: NIMH.
Mahler, M. S., & McDevitt, J. (1982). Thoughts on the emergence of a sense of self, with a particular emphasis on the body self. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 30, 827–848.
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1994). Stages in the infant’s separation from the mother. In G. Handel & G. G. Whitchurch (Eds.), The psychosocial interior of the family. (4th ed., pp. 419–448). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
Main, M. (2000). The organized categories of infant, child, and adult attachment: Flexible vs. inflexible attention under attachment-related stress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 1055–1096.
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development(Vol. 50) (1–2, serial no. 2009), (pp. 66–104), Hoboken: Wiley.
Main, M., Goldwyn, R., & Hesse, E. (2002). Adult attachment scoring and classification system. Unpublished manuscript.
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Goldwyn, R. (2008). Studying differences in language usage in recounting attachment history: An introduction to the AAI. In H. Steele & M. Steele (Eds.), Clinical applications of the adult attachment interview (pp. 31–68). New York: Guilford.
Marvin, R. S., & Britner, P. A. (1999). Normative development: The ontogeny of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 44–67). New York: Guilford.
McDevitt, J. (1975). Separation-individuation and object constancy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 23, 713–742.
Pine, F. (1994). Mahler’s concepts of “Symbiosis” and separation-individuation: Revisited, revaluated, refined. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52(2), 511–553.
McDevitt, J. (1980). The role of internalization in the development of object relations during the separation-individuation phase. In R. Lax, S. Bach & J. A. Burland (Eds.), Rapprochement: The critical subphase of separation-individuation. New York: Jason Aronson.
McDevitt, J., & Mahler, M. S. (1980). Object constancy, individuality and internalization. In S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock (Eds.), The course of Life: Psychoanalytic contributions toward understanding personality development (pp. 407–424). Bethesda: NIMH.
Olesker, W. (1998). Conflict and compromise in gender identity formation: A longitudinal study. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 53, 212–230.
Olesker, W. (2011). The story of Sam: Continuities and discontinuities in development. Transforming into and out of a perversion. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 65, 48–78.
Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.
Settlage, C. F., Bemesderfer, S., Rosenthal, J., Afterman, J., & Spielman, P. M. (1991). The appeal cycle in early mother-child interaction: Nature and implications of a finding from developmental research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 987–1014.
Solnit, A. J. (1982). Developmental perspectives on self and object constancy. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 37, 201–218.
Spitz, R. A. (1957). No and yes: On the genesis of human communication. New York: International Universities Press.
Sroufe, J. W. (2003). Appendix: The infant and adult attachment categories. In M. Cortina & M. Marrone (Eds.), Attachment theory and psychoanalytic process (pp. 470–476). London: Whurr.
Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Attachment and psychoanalysis: Time for a reunion. Social Development, 7, 92–119.
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
Tyson, P. (1991). Psychic structure formation: The complementary roles of affects, drives, object relations, and conflict. In T. Shapiro (Ed.), The concept of structure in psychoanalysis (pp. 73–98). New York: International Universities Press.
Tyson, P. (1992). The challenges of psychoanalytic developmental theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50, 19–52.
Tyson, P. (1996). Object relations, affect management and psychic structure formation: The concept of object constancy. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 51, 172–189.
Tyson, P. (2005). Separation-individuation, object constancy and affect regulation. In S. Akhtar and H. Blum (Eds.), The language of emotions: development, psychopathology and technique (pp. 69–82). New York: Jason Aronson.
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Kroonenberg, P. (1988). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the strange situation. Child Development, 59(1), 147–156.
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi, A. (1999). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 713–734). New York: Guilford
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Moran, G., Belsky, J., Pederson, D., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Kneppers, K. (2000). The similarities of siblings’ attachment to their mother. Child Development, 71, 1086–1098.
Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000). Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71, 684–689.
Winnicott, D. W. (1964). The child, the family and the outside environment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blom, I., Bergman, A. (2013). Observing Development: A Comparative View of Attachment Theory and Separation–Individuation Theory. In: Bettmann, J., Demetri Friedman, D. (eds) Attachment-Based Clinical Work with Children and Adolescents. Essential Clinical Social Work Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4848-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4848-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4847-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4848-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)