Skip to main content

Hernia, Mesh, and Gynecology Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Hernia Repair

Abstract

The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery, as in hernia operations, is widespread. This chapter provides an overview of indications for graft use in gynecologic surgery and, specifically, a detailed review of synthetic materials and their safety and effectiveness. This chapter will conclude with a discussion of concomitant procedures between hernia surgeons and gynecologists and offer recommendations for when it is appropriate for hernia surgeons to place mesh to repair a symptomatic hernia during a gynecologic procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos NS. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(4):501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007; 369(9566): 1027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects. A prospective randomized study of long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG. 2009;116:15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes ED, Lemos NL, Carramão Sda S, Lunardelli JL, Ruano JM, Aoki T, Auge AP. Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(4):389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diwadker G, Barber M, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2): 367–73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, et al. Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (ProliftTM techniques)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:743–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gauuder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, et al. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:1059–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N, Falconer CA, et al. Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12 Suppl 2:S5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(4): CD006375.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abouassaly R, Steinberg JR, Lemieux M, Marois C, Gilchrist LI, Bourque JL, le Tu M, Corcos J. Complications of tension-free vaginal tape surgery: a multi-institutional review. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit MH. Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A. Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(2):306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crivellaro S, Smith JJ, Kocjancic E, et al. Transvaginal sling using acellular human dermal allograft: safety and efficacy in 253 patients. J Urol. 2004;172:1374–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McBride AW, Ellerkmann RM, Bent AE, Melick CF. Comparison of long-term outcomes of autologous fascia lata slings with Suspend Tutoplast fascia lata allograft slings for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bent A, Cundiff G, Swift S. Sutues and grafts in pelvic reconstructure surgery Ostergard’s Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 6th ed. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams and Wilkns, 2008, p. 527.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clave A, Yahi H, Hammou J, Montanaru S, Suzelei M, Gounon P, Clave H. Polypropylene as a reinforcement in pelvic surgery is not inert: a comparative analysis of 100 explants. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

  23. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm

  24. Altemeier WA, Burke JF, Pruitt BA, Sandusky WR. Manual on control of infection in surgical patients. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Culligan P, Heit M, Blackwell L, Murphy M, Graham CA, Snyder J. Bacterial colony counts during vaginal surgery. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2003;11:161–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science. 1987;237:1588–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Capes T, Krishan R, LaBombardi V, Pipia G, Ascher-Walsh C, Jacob B. The prepped vaginal canal may be a more sterile conduit for ventral hernia mesh insertion than a prepped laparoscopic skin incision: a prospective comparative study of mesh contamination for NOTES hernia repair. Accepted abstract and podium presentation at the AHS, New York, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Rascoff MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rascoff, L., Jacob, B.P., Ascher-Walsh, C. (2013). Hernia, Mesh, and Gynecology Procedures. In: Jacob, B., Ramshaw, B. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Hernia Repair. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4824-2_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4824-2_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4823-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4824-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics