Advertisement

What are Assumptions?

  • Apollo M. Nkwake
Chapter

Abstract

Although the pertinence of implicit assumptions is underlined in theory-based evaluations, the nature of these assumptions has been rarely discussed. To understand the nature of underlying assumptions, it is necessary to review the notion of assumptions in general and its remarkable role in the generation of knowledge. This chapter discusses the nature of assumptions and groups in 10 categories of assumptions according to Brookfield’s (Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995) typology: Paradigmatic, Prescriptive and Causal assumptions and according to the degree of articulation.

Keywords

Gender Schema Ontological Assumption Epistemological Assumption Causal Assumption Implicit Stereotype 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akalis, S. A., Banaji, M. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Crime alert! How thinking about a single suspect automatically shifts stereotypes toward an entire group du bois review. Social Science Research on Race, 5(2), 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 17, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, G. E. (1933). Assumptions. The Accounting Review, 8(2), 157–159.Google Scholar
  5. Bernardo, A. E., Talley, E., & Welch, I. (2000). A theory of legal presumptions. Economics and Law, 16(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
  6. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, I. V., Jennifer, E. M., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowgill, D. O. (1964). Value assumptions in recent research on migration. International Migration Digest, 1(1), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conley, F. K. (1998). Walking out on the boys. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eliot, T. D. (1937). Reactions to predictive assumptions. American Sociological Review, 2(4), 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ennis, R. H. (1982). Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese, 51(1), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, E., & Handelsman, J. (2006). Reviewing applicants: Research on bias and assumptions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  16. Fogarty, R. J. (1994). How to teach metacognitive reflection. New York: Corwin.Google Scholar
  17. Fried, L. P., Francomano, C. A., MacDonald, S. M., Wagner, E. M., Stokes, E. J., Carbone, K. M., et al. (1996). Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 898–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harste, J. C., Woodward, V. A., & Burke, C. L. (1984). Examining our assumptions: A transactional view of literacy and learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 84–108.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanazawa, S. (1988). In defense of unrealistic assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16(2), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kies, D. (1995). Assumptions. Retrieved December 20, 2011 from http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/assume.htm.
  24. Kotze, D. A. (1987). Contradictions and assumptions in community development. Community Development Journal, 22(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mingers, J. A. (2003). Classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niemeyer, G. (1955). A query about assumptions on international organization. World Politics, 7(2), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Read, S. (2003). Freeing assumptions from the Liar paradox. Analysis, 63(2), 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Russell, B. (1904). Meinong’s theory of complexes and assumptions. Mind, New Series, 13(51), 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sean, C., Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1996). Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherman, B., & Harman, G. (2011). Knowledge and assumptions. Philosophical Studies, 156(2011), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13(4), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sosa, E. (1974). How do you know? American Philosophical Quarterly, 11(2), 113–122.Google Scholar
  34. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (Eds.). (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Stokoe, E. H., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trachman, M., & Bluestone, C. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? College Teaching, 53(4), 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ullman-Margalit, E. (1983). On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(3), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Valian, V. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zaman, M. H. & Rabbi, R. E. (2010). What are the descriptive assumptions in critical reading? Retrieved December 12, 2011 from http://criticalreadingsblogspot.com.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Vision, IncWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations