Skip to main content

Global Trade Linkages: National Security and Human Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linking Trade and Security

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ((PEAP,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter explores the linkages between international trade rules, national security, and various dimensions of human security, which includes the environment, labor, and human rights. It shows how and why such linkages emerged, describes who initiated and opposed them, and explains how they have affected the membership, terms, scope, and interpretations of global trade agreements. In contrast to several other essays in this volume, this chapter focuses not on regional or bilateral trade agreements, but on multilateral ones. It specifically explores trade policy linkages in the context of the International Trade Organization (ITO) , the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed discussion of the ITO, see Drache (2000).

  2. 2.

    Ibid, 17.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Ibid, 4.

  6. 6.

    This section is based on McKenzie (2008), 79–109.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 87.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 79.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 87–88.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 79.

  11. 11.

    See Miller (2000).

  12. 12.

    For an extensive discussion of the accession of communist states, see Haus (1992).

  13. 13.

    Quoted in Vogel (1995), 110. For a more extensive discussion of this case and the debate over its implications, see ibid., 103–125.

  14. 14.

    Quoted in ibid., 112.

  15. 15.

    See for example, Zaelke et al. (1993), Runge (1994), Steinberg (2002), Brack (1998), Esty (1994), and Vogel (1995), 98–114.

  16. 16.

    Quoted in Vogel (1995), 136.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 137.

  18. 18.

    Quoted in ibid., 138.

  19. 19.

    For a detailed discussion of this issue, see Kuijper (2010).

  20. 20.

    See Cottier (2002) and Howse and Meltzer (2002).

  21. 21.

    See Weinstein and Charnovitz (2001) and Wofford (2000), 563–592. For a comprehensive analysis of the seven trade disputes that have addressed environment and public health regulations, see Kelly (2007).

  22. 22.

    For a discussion of under what conditions they would be required to meet to be judged WTO consistent, see Pauwelyn (2007).

  23. 23.

    See, for example, Charnovitz (2003), Low et al. (2011), Zhang and Assuncao (2002), Pauwelyn (2010) and World Trade Organization (2009).

  24. 24.

    Low, “The Interface,” ii.

  25. 25.

    Quoted in Vogel (2006), 364.

  26. 26.

    Ibid, 64.

  27. 27.

    For a highly critical analysis of the CTE’s weak environmental impact, see Gabler (2010), 80–117.

  28. 28.

    See Shaffer (2002), 80–114. He notes that not only has there been no agreement within the CTE among countries, but in many cases, the interests and policy preference within WTO members have been divided.

  29. 29.

    Quoted in Charnovitz (2002), 259.

  30. 30.

    See, for example, Esty (2002), 7–22 and Conca (2000), 484–494.

  31. 31.

    For an extended discussion of how these provisions and other mechanisms could be utilized to incorporate labor standards into the WTO, see Turnell (2001).

  32. 32.

    Quoted in Charnovitz (2002), 259.

  33. 33.

    Quoted in ibid., 261.

  34. 34.

    Quoted in ibid.

  35. 35.

    Ibid., 280.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., 263.

  37. 37.

    Quoted in Pauwelyn (2003), 1185–1186.

  38. 38.

    See Marceau (2002), 753–814.

  39. 39.

    Quoted in Aaronson (2007b), 19.

  40. 40.

    For an analysis of the limitations of the WTO in enforcing human rights provisions, see Marceau (2002), 753–814.

  41. 41.

    For a more detailed discussion of the KP, see Vogel (2009), 172–173.

  42. 42.

    This criticism of the WTO is detailed in Pauwelyn (2003), 1177–1207.

  43. 43.

    See Vogel (2009), 155–188 and Vogel (2005).

  44. 44.

    For a detailed discussion of these labels and their policy impact, see Zarrilli (1997) and OECD (1997).

  45. 45.

    See Conroy (2007).

  46. 46.

    For this trade dispute, see Vogel (1995), 130.

  47. 47.

    Quoted in Aaronson (2007a), 650.

  48. 48.

    Quoted in Melser and Robertson (2005), 52.

  49. 49.

    For an extended discussion of these trade agreements and why they were adopted, see Hafner-Burton (2009). For the use of CSR standards in several trade agreements, see Aaronson (2007a), 638–639.

References

  • Aaronson, Susan. 2007a. A match made in the corporate and public interest: Marrying voluntary CSR initiatives and the WTO. Journal of World Trade, 41(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson, Susan. 2007b. Seeping in slowly: How human rights concerns are penetrating the WTO. World Trade Review 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, Duncan, ed. 1998. Trade and environment: Conflict or compatibility?. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, James, and Karen Campbell. 2002. A reluctant global policymaker. In The greening of trade law: International trade organizations and environmental issues, ed. Richard H. Steinberg, 23–50. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. Trade law and global governance. London: Cameron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, Steve. 2003. Trade and climate: Potential conflicts and synergies. Pew Center for Global Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken. 2000. The WTO and the undermining of global economic governance. Review of International Political Economy 7(3) (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, Michael. 2007. Branded! How the ‘certification revolution’ is transforming global corporations. British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottier, Thomas. 2002. Implications for trade law and policy: Towards convergence and integration. In The Cartagena protocol on biosafety: Reconciling trade in biotechnology with environment and development?, ed. Christopher Bail, Robert Falkner and Helene Marquard. London: Royal Institute for International Affairs/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSombre, Elizabeth, and J. Samuel Barkin. 2002. Turtles and trade: The WTO’s acceptance of environmental trade restrictions. Global Environmental Politics 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drache, Daniel. 2000. The short but significant life of the International Trade Organization: Lessons for our time. Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalisation, University of Warwick, CSRG working paper 62/00.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and multilateral environmental agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, Daniel. 1994. Greening the GATT: Trade, environment, and the future. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, Daniel. 2002. The World Trade Organization’s legitimacy crisis. World Trade Review 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler, Melissa. 2010. Norms, institutions and social learning: An explanation for weak policy integration in the WTO’s committee on trade and environment. Global Environmental Politics 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, Emilie-Burton. 2009. Forced to be good: Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haus, Leah. 1992. Globalizing the GATT: The Soviet Union’s successor states, Eastern Europe, and the international trading system. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, Robert. 1999. The World Trade Organization and the protection of workers’ rights. The Journal of Small & Emerging Business Law 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, Robert, and Joshua Meltzer. 2002. The significance of the WTO for dispute settlement. In The Cartagena protocol on biosafety: Reconciling trade in biotechnology with environment and development?, ed. Christopher Bail, Robert Falkner and Helene Marquard. London: Royal Institute for International Affairs/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinnah, Sikina. 2010. Overlap management in World Trade Organization: Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Trish. 2007. The impact of the WTO: The environment, public health and sovereignty. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijper, Pieter. 2010. Conflicting rules and clashing courts: The case of environmental agreements, free trade agreements, and the WTO. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper no. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, Patrick, Gabriella Marceau, and Julia Reinaud. 2011. The interface between the trade and climate change regimes: Scoping the issues. World Trade Organization, staff working paper ERD-2011-1, Jan 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, Gabrielle. 2002. WTO dispute settlement and human rights. EGIL 13(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Francine. 2008. GATT in the cold war: Accession debates, institutional development, and the western alliance, 1947–1959. Journal of Cold War Studies 10(3), Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melser, Daniel, and Peter Robertson. 2005. Eco-labelling and the trade-environment debate. The World Economy 28(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, James. 2000. Origins of the GATT: British resistance to American multilateralism. Jerome Levy Economics Institute working paper no. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 1997. Eco-labelling: Actual effects of selected programs, OCDE/GD(97)105. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. WTO compassion or superiority complex?: What to make of the WTO waiver for ‘conflict diamonds’. Michigan Journal of International Law 24: 1177–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn, Joost. 2007. A carbon levy on imports to fight climate change? Telos Sept 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn, Joost, ed. 2010. Global challenges at the intersection of trade, energy and environment. Geneva: Centre for Trade and Economic Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, Ford. 1994. Freer trade, protected environment: Balancing trade liberalization and environmental interests. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, Gregory. 2002. The nexus of law and politics. In The greening of trade law: International trade organizations and environmental issues, ed. Richard Steinberg. Latham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Richard, ed. 2002. The greening of trade law: International trade organizations and environmental issues. Latham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, Sean. 2001. Core labor standards and the WTO, no. 0103, research papers, Macquarie University, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 1995. Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 2005. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 2006. International trade and environmental regulation. In Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, ed. Norman Vig and Michael Kraft. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. 2009. The private regulation of corporate social conduct. In The politics of global regulation, ed. Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Michael, and Steve Charnovitz (2001) The greening of the WTO. Foreign Affairs 80(6): 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford, Carrie. 2000. A greener future at the WTO: The refinement of WTO jurisprudence on environmental exceptions to GATT. Harvard Environmental Law Review 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. 2009. Trade and climate change: WTO-UNEP report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaelke, Durwood, Paul Orbuch, and Robert Housman, eds. 1993. Trade and the environment: Law, economics, and policy. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrilli, Simonetta, Veena Jha, and Rene Vossenaar, eds. 1997. Eco-labelling and international trade. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, ZhongXiang, and Lucas Assuncao. 2002. Domestic climate policies and the WTO. East-West Center working paper, environment series, no. 51, Feb.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Vogel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vogel, D. (2013). Global Trade Linkages: National Security and Human Security. In: Aggarwal, V., Govella, K. (eds) Linking Trade and Security. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4765-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics