Abstract
The purpose of the simple regression is to study the relationship between one explanatory variable and one dependent variable. The purpose of a multiple regression (the term was first used by Pearson and Lee (1908)) is to learn about the relationships between several explanatory variables and a dependent variable. The extension of the model from one explanatory variable into several explanatory variables introduces several complications. For example, in a multiple regression setting one has to consider the effects of the relationships among the explanatory variables on the estimates. On the other hand, an advantage is that one can mix the regression methodologies used (i.e., apply different regression methodologies to different explanatory variables). In this chapter we will be mainly interested in methods of multiple regressions that are based on the simple regression coefficients. By “based on” we mean not only that the multiple regression coefficients are derived by the same principle that is used to derive the simple regression coefficients but also that the simple regression coefficients are used as the building blocks of the multiple regression coefficients. As such, one can learn about their properties from the properties of the simple coefficients. In particular, we have shown in Chap. 7 that the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and semi-parametric Gini regression estimators can be interpreted as the slopes of the linear approximations to a regression curve, because they are based on weighted averages of slopes defined between adjacent observations. In other words, the linearity assumption on the regression curve is not used in the estimation stage. This property continues to hold in our extension into the multiple regression case. However, we do introduce some kind of a linearity requirement. The linearity requirement differs from the linearity assumption on the model because it is imposed on the set of equations that are used to derive the multiple regression coefficients, as will be seen below.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
2Note that when minimizing the EG of the error term there is only one ν: the one applied to the residual.
- 3.
3A critical point that distinguishes between the two approaches of the extended Gini regression is the variable to which the weighting scheme is applied: in EG regressions that belong to the covariance based family the application of the weighting scheme is to the explanatory variables, while in the EG minimization, the application is to the residuals. Under the quantile regression regime the application of the weighting scheme is also to the residuals. See Ben Hur, Frantskevich, Schechtman, and Yitzhaki (2010).
- 4.
4The term \( {{\beta }_{\rm{jk}}}{(}{{\upnu }_{\rm{k}}}{)} \) is intended to allow a different treatment for each explanatory variable, according to νk, the parameter of the extended Gini. See Schechtman et al. (2).
References
Ben Hur, D., Frantskevich, L., Schechtman, E., & Yitzhaki, S. (2010). Tracing the curvature of a regression curve (pp. 31–56). MILI Publications: Advances and Applications in Statistical Sciences.
DeLaubenfels, R. (2006). The victory of least squares and orthogonality in Statistics. The American Statistician, 60(4 (November)), 315–321.
Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (1998). Rank regression, wage distribution, and the gender gap. The Journal of Human Resources, 33(3 (Summer)), 610–643.
Hettmansperger, T. P. (1984). Statistical inference based on ranks. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Juhn, C., Murphy, K., & Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 410–442.
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33–50.
Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2). Quantile regression. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143–156.
Olkin, I., & Yitzhaki, S. (1992). Gini regression analysis. International Statistical Review, 60(2), 185–196.
Pearson, K., & Lee, A. (1908). On the generalised probable error in multiple normal correlation. Biometrika, 6(1 (March)), 59–68.
Schechtman, E., Yitzhaki, S., & Artzev, Y. (2). Who does not respond in the household expenditure survey: An exercise in extended Gini regressions. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 26(3), 329–344.
Wainer, H., Gessaroli, M., & Verdi, M. (2006). Finding what is not there through the unfortunate binning of results: The Mendel effect. Chance, 19(1), 49–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yitzhaki, S., Schechtman, E. (2013). Multiple Regressions. In: The Gini Methodology. Springer Series in Statistics, vol 272. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4720-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4720-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4719-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4720-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)