The Lorenz Curve and the Concentration Curve

  • Shlomo Yitzhaki
  • Edna Schechtman
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS, volume 272)

Abstract

The Lorenz and the concentration curves play important roles in the areas of GMD and the related measures such as Gini covariance, Gini correlation, Gini regression, and more. In this chapter we introduce the curves, discuss their properties, and show their connections to the Gini world. In addition, in order to be able to analyze the parallel concepts that are common in the variance world we investigate the equivalents of the Lorenz and the concentration curves that are relevant to the variance and the covariance, respectively. Those parallel curves share some properties among themselves. Therefore one can deduct from the concentration curve about some properties of the covariance and not only about the Gini covariance. In addition we present the relationships between the concepts of second-degree stochastic dominance and welfare dominance on one hand and the concentration and Lorenz curves on the other hand. These relationships enable the Gini methodology to serve as an analytical tool for statistical analyses and to be compatible with economic theory, a property that holds for the variance as well, but only for specific distributions.

Keywords

Covariance Income 

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blitz, R. C., & Brittain, J. A. (1964). An extension of the Lorenz diagram to the correlation of two variables. Metron, XXIII(1–4), 137–143.Google Scholar
  3. Gastwirth, J. L. (1971). A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica, 1971, 1037–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gastwirth, J. L. (1972). The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 306–316.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grether, D. M. (1974). Correlation with ordinal data. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 241–246.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hart, P. E. (1975). Moment distributions in economics: An exposition. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 138(Part 3), 423–434.Google Scholar
  7. Iyengar, N. S. (1960). On a method of computing Engel elasticities from concentration curves. Econometrica, 28(4 (October)), 882–891.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kakwani, N. C. (1977). Applications of Lorenz curves in economic analysis. Econometrica, 45, 719–727.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kakwani, N. C. (1980). On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica, 48(2 (March)), 437–446.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambert, P. J. (2). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Third edition.Google Scholar
  11. Levy, H. (2006). Stochastic dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods for measuring concentration of wealth. Journal of American Statistical Association, 9(June), 209–219. New Series No. 70.Google Scholar
  13. Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its application. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mayshar, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (1995). Dalton-improving indirect tax reforms. American Economic Review, 85(4 (September)), 793–808.Google Scholar
  15. Mayshar, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (1996). Dalton-improving indirect tax reform II—With differences in needs and ability. Journal of Public Economics, 62(3 (November)), 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Newberry, D. (1970). A theorem on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(September), 264–266.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (1994). Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. Management Science, 40, 670–684.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shalit, H., & Yitzhaki, S. (2003). An asset allocation puzzle: Comment. American Economic Review, 93, 1002–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shorrocks, A. F. (1983). Ranking income distributions. Economica, 50, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suits, D. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity. American Economic Review, 67, 747–752.Google Scholar
  21. Taguchi, T. (1981). On a multiple Gini coefficient and some concentrative regressions. Metron, XXXIX(1–2), 39.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Taguchi, T. (1987). On the structure of multivariate concentration—some relationships among the concentration surface of two variate mean difference and regressions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 6, 307–334.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yitzhaki, S. (1982a). Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and the Gini’s mean difference. American Economic Review, 72, 178–185.Google Scholar
  24. Yitzhaki, S. (1982b). Relative deprivation and economic welfare. European Economic Review, 17, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yitzhaki, S. (1982c). A tax programming model. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yitzhaki, S. (1983). On an extension of the Gini inequality index. International Economic Review, 24(3 (October)), 617–628.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yitzhaki, S. (1990). On the sensitivity of a regression coefficient to monotonic transformations. Econometric Theory, 6(2), 165–169.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yitzhaki, S. (1996). On using linear regression in welfare economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(4 (October)), 478–486.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Yitzhaki, S. (1998). More than a dozen alternative ways of spelling Gini. Research on Economic Inequality, 8, 13–30.Google Scholar
  30. Yitzhaki, S., & Golan, Y. (2010). Monotonic and non-monotonic relationship in the labor market. Economic Quarterly, 56(2), 143–168 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  31. Yitzhaki, S. (1999). Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Dominance using Generalized Lorenz Curves, in Slottje, D. J. (ed.) Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology: Essays in Honor of Camilo Dagum, Heidelberg:Physica-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  32. Yitzhaki, S., & Mayshar, J. (2002). Characterizing efficient portfolios. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=297899. Unpublished.
  33. Yitzhaki, S., & Olkin, I. (1988). Concentration curves. WP no. 179, Dept. of Economics, The Hebrew University and technical report no.230, 1987, Dept. of Statistics, Stanford University. http://statistics.stanford.edu/~ckirby/techreports/NSF/OLK%20NSF%20230.pdf.
  34. Yitzhaki, S., & Olkin, I. (1991). Concentration indices and concentration curves. In Karl Mosler and Marco Scarsini (Eds.), Stochastic orders and decisions under risk, 19 (pp. 380–392). Institute Of Mathematical Statistics: Lecture-Notes Monograph Series.Google Scholar
  35. Yitzhaki, S., & Schechtman, E. (2004). The Gini instrumental variable, or the “double instrumental variable” estimator. Metron, LXII(3), 287–313.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Yitzhaki, S., & Semrod, J. (1991). Welfare dominance: An application to commodity taxation. American Economic Review, 81(3 (June)), 480–496.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shlomo Yitzhaki
    • 1
  • Edna Schechtman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations