Abstract
Besides clarifying the definitions of equity and access we briefly contrast two philosophical positions on the nature of mathematics and speculate about their consequences for equity and access. We next discuss “whose mathematics,” and provide a viewpoint for mathematics learning as related to equity and access for students. We also consider mathematics teachers and their teaching role as these are related to equity and access for students, and then broaden the chapter to include political influences on both teachers of mathematics and learners. Given the diverse political systems in operation throughout the world, and the range of conditions within and between countries, we are unable to frame questions that can be definitively answered. Our observations relate to the role that politics plays at different levels to influence access and equity for teaching and learning mathematics and are supported by particular examples, some from history, others documenting more recent events. Finally we offer a brief discussion of several international cases of what we believe is a form of colonization that follows from official insistence on “English first” in teaching mathematics in some states where English is a second language for students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bracey, G. (2009). The Bracey Report on the condition of public education, 2009. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved March 20, 2011 from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/Bracey-Report
Business-Higher Education Forum. (2007). An American imperative: Transforming the recruitment, retention, and renewal of our nation’s mathematics and science teaching workforce: Teaching quick facts. Bakersfield, CA: Author.
Chapman, K. (2009, July 9). It is Bahasa again but more emphasis will be placed on learning English. The Star, N2. Retrieved from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/9/nation/4286168&sec=nation
Choong, K. F. (2004). English for the teaching of mathematics and science (ETeMS): From concept to implementation. Retrieved January 1, 2009 from http://eltcm.org/eltc/resource_pabank.asp
Christie, M. J. (1995, July). The purloined pedagogy: Aboriginal epistemology and maths education. Presented to the joint meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia and the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Darwin, Australia.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5, 44–48.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Fennema, E., & Leder, G. (Eds.). (1990). Mathematics and gender: Influences on teachers and students. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51–71.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3), 189–203.
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 389–420.
Garegae, K. G. (2007). On code switching and English language proficiency: The case of mathematics learning. The International Journal of Learning, 14(3), 233–238.
Harel, G. (2010, April). The role of mathematics in mathematics education research: Question for public debate. Paper presented at the Research Pre-session of the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego, CA.
Harris, P. (1991). Mathematics in a cultural context: Aboriginal perspectives on space, time and money. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Heid, M. K. (2010). Where’s the math (in mathematics education research)? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 102–103.
Hunkin-Finau, S. S. (2006). An indigenous approach to teacher education in American Sāmoa. Educational Perspectives, 39(2), 47–52.
Husén, T. (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.
Ingvarson, L., & Rowe, K. (2007). Conceptualizing and evaluating teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues. Student Learning Processes. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/learning_processes/8
Keady, P. (2006). Theorising globalisation’s social impact: Proposing the concept of vulnerability. Review of International Political Economy, 13(4), 632–655.
Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., & Karjalainen, T. (2009). The Finnish education system and PISA. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.
Lim, C. S., & Ellerton, N. F. (2009). Malaysian experiences of teaching mathematics in English: Political dilemma versus reality. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 9–16). Thessaloniki, Greece: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Lim, C. S., & Presmeg, N. (2011). Teaching mathematics in two languages: A teaching dilemma of Malaysian Chinese primary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 137–161.
Lim, C. S., Saleh, F., & Tang, K. N. (2007). The teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English: The perspectives of primary school administrators, teachers and pupils. Centre for Malaysian Chinese Studies Research Paper Series No. 3, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Maher, F. (2002). The attack on teacher education and teachers. The Radical Teacher, 64, 5–8.
Martin, D. D., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24.
Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2011). World Internet users and population statistics. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm, July 11, 2011.
Nasir, N. S., & Cobb, P. (Eds.). (2007). Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics [NCES]. (2010). Condition of education: Special analysis high-poverty schools. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2010/analysis/section3a2.asp
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2005). Position paper: Closing the achievement gap. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?ide=6350, July 7, 2011.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Program for the research presession. Reston, VA: Author.
OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Paris, France: Author. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background: Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. 2). Paris, France: Author. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong performers and successful reformers in Education. Paris, France: Author.
Powell, A. B., & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Reyes, L. H., & Stanic, G. M. A. (1988). Race, sex, socioeconomic status and mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 26–43.
Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Value-added analysis and teacher policy. Brief 1. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Secada, W. G. (1990). Needed: An agenda for equity in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(5), 354–355.
Setati, M. (2005). Teaching mathematics in a primary multilingual classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 447–466.
Skovsmose, O. (2010, October). Mathematics: A critical rationality? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 25, 1–23.
Tan, K. E., Lim, C. S., Chew, C. M., & Kor, L. K. (2011). Talking mathematics in English. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 133–143.
White, J. L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y.-F. (2006). Cultural dimensions in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Implications for minority retention research. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 6(2), 41–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pateman, N.A., Lim, C.S. (2012). The Politics of Equity and Access in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. In: Clements, M., Bishop, A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F. (eds) Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4684-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)