Abstract
In mathematics education research and practice today we notice a change in the multiplicity of approaches that allow us to widen our perspectives on diverse social, political and cultural dimensions of mathematics education. This chapter provides an overview of trends and a critical discussion of the use of theories to approach, discuss and critique research and practices in mathematics education, particularly with attention to social, political and cultural dimensions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaron, W. R. (2008). Academic identities of geometry students. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference PME32–PMENAXXX for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–8). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
Adler, J., & Lerman, S. (2003). Getting the description right and making it count: Ethical practice in mathematics education research. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 441–470). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alrø, H., Ravn, O., & Valero, P. (Eds.). (2010). Critical mathematics education: Past, present and future. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (Ben Brewster, Trans.) (pp. 121–176). London, UK: New Left Books.
Barton, B. (2008). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales. New York, NY: Springer.
Barwell, R. (2007). Semiotic resources for doing and learning mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 31–32.
Barwell, R. (2009). Researchers’ descriptions and the construction of mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 255–269.
Barwell, R., Barton, B., & Setati, M. (2007). Multilingual issues in mathematics education: Introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 113–119.
Bibby, T. (2010). What does it mean to characterize mathematics as “masculine”? Bringing a psychoanalytic lens to bear on the teaching and learning of mathematics. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 21–41). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Bishop, A., Clements, M. A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. (Eds.). (2003). Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Black, L., Williams, J., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Davis, P., Pampaka, M., & Wake, G. (2010). Developing a “leading identity”: The relationship between students’ mathematical identities and their career and higher education aspirations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 55–72.
Boaler, J. (Ed.). (2000). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Breen, C. (2007). On humanistic mathematics education: A personal coming of age? In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–16). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Brown, T. (Ed.). (2008). The psychology of mathematics education: A psychoanalytic displacement. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2010). New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education. New York, NY: Springer.
Carlsen, M. (2010). Appropriating geometric series as a cultural tool: A study of student collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 95–116.
Chronaki, A. (2011). Disrupting “development” as the quality/equity discourse: Cyborfs and the subalterns in school technoscience. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer.
Chronaki, A., & Christiansen, I. (Eds.). (2005). Challenging perspectives on mathematics classroom communication. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age/NCTM.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
de Abreu, G. (2008). From mathematics learning out-of-school to multicultural classrooms: A cultural psychology perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 354–386). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
De Andrade, S. (2008). The relationship between research and classroom in mathematics education: A very complex and multiple look phenonemon. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference PME32 – PMENAXXX for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 57–64). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
De Freitas, E. (2009). Decoding the discourse of difficulty in high school mathematics. In M. Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 365). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
De Freitas, E. (2010). Regulating mathematics classroom discourse: Text, context and intertextuality. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 129–151). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
De Freitas, E., & Nolan, K. (Eds.). (2008). Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London, UK: Falmer.
Ensor, P., & Galant, J. (2005). Knowledge and pedagogy: Sociological research in mathematics education in South Africa. In R. Vithal, J. Adler, & C. Keitel (Eds.), Researching mathematics education in South Africa. Perspectives, practices and possibilities (pp. 281–306). Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
Ernest, P. (2009). Globalization, ideology and research in mathematics education. In M. Setati, R. Vithal, C. Malcolm, & R. Dhunpath (Eds.), Researching possibilities in mathematics, science and technology education (pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Evans, J., & Morgan, C. (2009). Sociological frameworks in mathematics education research: Discursive approaches. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 223–226). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Morgan, C. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference: Berlin, March 20–25, 2010. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). New York, NY: Springer.
Halliday, M. (1978). Sociolinguistic aspects of mathematics education. In M. Halliday (Ed.), Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 194–204). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Hanley, U. (2010). Teachers and curriculum change: Working to get it right. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 3–19). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Hegedus, S., & Penuel, W. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 171–183.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., & Pimm, D. (Eds.). (2011). Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies. New York, NY: Springer.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (Eds.). (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2010). Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 23–42.
Huzzard, T. (2004). Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 350–361.
Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 77–104). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jablonka, E., & Bergsten, C. (2010). Theorising in mathematics education research: Differences in modes and quality. Nordisk matematikkdidaktikk: Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–52.
Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2007). Mathematisation–demathematisation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematization and de-mathematization: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2011). Equity concerns about mathematical modelling. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 221–234). New York, NY: Springer.
Lerman, S. (2009). Sociological frameworks in mathematics education research. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, p. 217). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Lester, F. K. (Ed.). (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age/NCTM.
Leung, A., & Or, C. (2007). From construction to proof: Explanations in dynamic geometry environment. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 177–184). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Martin, D. (2010). Not-so-strange bedfellows: Racial projects and the mathematics education enterprise. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference: Berlin, March 20–25, 2010 (pp. 57–79). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
Matos, J. P., Valero, P., & Yasukawa, K. (Eds.). (2008). Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference Albufeira, Portugal, February 16–21, 2008. Lisbon: Centre de Investigacao em Educacao, Universidade de Lisboa and Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University.
Mattos, A. C., Batarce, M. S., & Lerman, S. (2010). Discussion group: Mathematics education and democracy. In M. M. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 338). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
Mesa, V., & Chang, P. (2008). Instructors’ language in two undergraduate mathematics classrooms. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 30th Conference of PME-NA (Vol. 3, pp. 367–374). Morelia, Mexico: PME
Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(12), 219–245.
Morgan, C. (2009). Understanding practices in mathematics education: Structure and text. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 49–64). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Moschkovich, J. (Ed.). (2010). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Nachlieli, T., & Herbst, P. (2007). Students engaged in proving—participants in an inquiry process or executers of a predetermined script? In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 9–16). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Noss, R., Brown, A., Drake, P., Dowling, P., Harris, M., Hoyles, C., & Mellin-Olsen, S. (Eds.). (1990). The political dimensions of mathematics education: Action & critique. London, UK: Institute of Education.
Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2011). Beyond disavowing the politics of equity and quality in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 35–48). New York, NY: Springer.
Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London, UK: Routledge.
Pimm, D. (2007). Registering surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 31.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Introduction: Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(2), 91–95.
Renert, M., & Davis, B. (2010). Life in mathematics: Evolutionary perspectives on subject matter. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 177–199). New York, NY: Information Age Publishing.
Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–198.
Sakonidis, H., & Klothou, A. (2007). On primary teachers’ assessment of pupils’ written work in mathematics. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 153–160). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 39–68). Charlotte, NC: NCTM/IAP.
Skovsmose, O. (2006). Research, practice, uncertainty and responsibility. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 25(4), 267–284.
Skovsmose, O. (2007). Students’ foregrounds and the politics of learning obstacles. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematization and de-mathematization: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 81–94). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2009). In doubt: About language, mathematics, knowledge and life-worlds. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sriraman, B., & English, L. (2010). Surveying theories and philosophies of mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 7–32). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Fragile learning in the classroom: Exploring mathematics lessons within a pre-service course. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 87–107). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Sullivan, P. (2008). Designing task-based mathematics lessons. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference PME32 – PMENAXXX for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 133–138). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
Teese, R. (2000). Academic success and social power. Examinations and inequality. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
Tsatsaroni, A., Lerman, S., & Xu, G.-R. (2003, April). A sociological description of changes in the intellectual field of mathematics education research: Implications for the identities of academics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Introduction: Setting the scene of this book. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 1–4). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Voigt, J. (1984). Interaktionsmuster und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht. Theoretische Grundlagen und mikroethnographische Falluntersuchungen. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
Voigt, J. (1996). Negotiation of mathematical meaning in classroom processes: Social interaction and learning mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 21–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). Discursive tools for suppressing and inviting dialogue in the mathematics classroom. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lake Tahoe, USA.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.
Walls, F. (2009). Mathematical subjects: Children talk about their mathematics lives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Walls, F. (2010). The good mathematics teacher: Standardized mathematics tests, teacher identituy, and pedagogy. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 65–83). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Walshaw, M. (2004a). The pedagogical relation in postmodern times: Learning with Lacan. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 121–139). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004b). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2010). Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Zolkower, B., & de Freitas, E. (2010). What’s in a text? Engaging mathematics teachers in the study of whole-class conversations. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 508–518). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jablonka, E., Wagner, D., Walshaw, M. (2012). Theories for Studying Social, Political and Cultural Dimensions of Mathematics Education. In: Clements, M., Bishop, A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F. (eds) Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4684-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)