Abstract
As the field of mathematics education grows so too do the research methods used to study the field. In the special area of teacher education, the last decade has witnessed a substantial increase in attention. New perspectives and new methodologies have been constituted and new research techniques established. Choosing the “right” method is not a trivial task for any researcher, and increasingly we are seeing more sophisticated research methods, including different forms of mixed methods. A main concern of research these days relates to the fact that as well as studying teachers and teaching, researchers want to see their findings applied to the professional development of teachers and to a critical modification of teacher education practices, in the frame of social changes. This has led to more research with teachers rather than on teachers. After surveying state-of-the-art of methods in research on mathematics teacher education published in renowned international journals, this chapter focusses on participatory action research as an example of a research method from the politicized periphery of the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359–381.
Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Ander-Egg, E. (2003). Repensando la investigación-acción participativa. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lumen.
Apple, M. (1997). Teoría crítica y educación. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Miño y Dávila Editores.
Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 139–163.
Barrantes, M., & Blanco, L. J. (2006). A study of prospective primary teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning school geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(5), 411–436.
Barwell, R. (2003). Discursive psychology and mathematics education: Possibilities and challenges. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 35(5), 201–207.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Bazzini, L. (2007). The mutual influence of theory and practice in mathematics education: Implications for research and teaching. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 119–125.
Becerra, R. (2003). Construyendo una estrategia metodológica participativa en el curso de Geometría del currículo de formación del docente integrador (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Caracas, Venezuela.
Becerra, R. (2005). La educación matemática crítica: Origen y perspectivas. In D. Mora (Ed.), Didáctica crítica, educación crítica de las matemáticas y etnomatemática (pp. 165–203). La Paz, Bolivia: Campo Iris.
Becerra, R. (2010). Action-research in the Venezuelan classrooms. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 121–129). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
Becerra, R., & Moya, A. (2008). Hacia una formación docente crítica y transformadora. In D. Mora & S. De Alarcón (Eds.), Investigar y transformer: Reflexiones críticas para pensar la educación (pp. 109–155). La Paz, Bolivia: III-CAB.
Becerra, R., & Moya, A. (2010). Investigación-acción participativa crítica y transformadora: Un proceso permanente en construcción. Integra Educativa, 3(2), 133–156.
Bekdemir, M. (2010). The pre-service teachers’ mathematics anxiety related to depth of negative experiences in mathematics classroom while they were students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 311–328.
Bigott, L. (1992). Investigación alternativa y educación popular en América Latina. Caracas, Venezuela: Fondo Editorial Tropykos.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Boylan, M. (2010). “It’s getting me thinking and I’m an old cynic”: Exploring the relational dynamics of mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 383–395.
Breen, C. (2003). Mathematics teachers as researchers: Living on the edge? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 523–544). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2010). Mathematics teacher and mathematics teacher educator change: Insight through theoretical perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 375–382.
Burton, L. (2002). Methodology and methods in mathematics education research: Where is “the why”? In S. Goodchild & L. English (Eds.), Researching mathematics classrooms: A critical examination of methodology (pp. 1–10). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Cantoral, R. (2000, July). La matemática educativa en Latinoamérica. Interview at the 14th Reunión Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa (Relme 14), Panama. Retrieved from http://www.educ.ar/educar/site/educar/la-matematica-educativa-en-latinoamerica--entrevista-al-investigador-ricardo-cantoral-uriza.html.
Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5–12.
Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 445–458.
Chinnappan, M., & Lawson, M. J. (2005). A framework for analysis of teachers’ geometric content knowledge and geometric knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 197–221.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Cockburn, A. (2008). How can research be used to inform and improve mathematics teaching practice? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 343–347.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Narrative research designs. In Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 511–550). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education
Davis, J. D. (2009). Understanding the influence of two mathematics textbooks on prospective secondary teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 365–389.
Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1986). Descartes’ dream: The world according to mathematics. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
De Silva, G. V. S., Wignaraja, P., Mehta, N., & Rahman, M. A. (1979). Bhoomi Sena: A struggle for people’s power. Development Dialogue, 2, 3–70.
Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire la raison et chercher la verité dans les sciences. Leyde, Belgium: Ian Maire.
Dowling, P. (2009). Sociology as method: Departures from the forensics of culture, text and knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Drake, C. (2006). Turning points: Using teachers’ mathematics life stories to understand the implementation of mathematics education reform. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 579–608.
Dussel, E. (1995). The invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the other” and the myth of modernity. London, UK: Continuum.
Dussel, E. (2011). Filosofía de le liberación en la era de la globalización y la exclusión. In Pensando el mundo desde Bolivia: I ciclo de seminarios internacionales (pp. 259–272). La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Fals Borda, O. (1979–1986). Historia doble de la costa (4 Vols.). Bogotá, Colombia: Carlos Valencia.
Fals Borda, O. (1986). Investigación-acción participativa en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Punta de Lanza y Foro Nacional por Colombia.
Fals Borda, O. (1995). Conocimiento y poder popular. Bogotá, Colombia: Siglo XXI.
Fals Borda, O. (2001). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 27–37). London, UK: Sage.
Fals Borda, O. (2003). Ante la crisis del país: Ideas/acción para el cambio. Bogotá, Colombia: El Áncora Editores.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fierro, C., Fortoul, B., & Rosas, L. (1999). Transformando la práctica docente: Una propuesta basada en la investigación-acción. México D.F: Paidós.
Florio, S., & Walsh, M. (1981). The teacher as colleague in classroom research. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H.-P. Au (Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 87–101). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1990). La naturaleza política de la educación: Cultura, poder y liberación. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
Frykholm, J. A. (1999). The impact of reform: Challenges for mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 79–105.
Gellert, U. (2001). Research on attitudes in mathematics education: A discursive perspective. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 33–40). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
Gellert, U. (2003). Researching teacher communities and networks. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 35(5), 224–232.
Gellert, U. (2009). Analysing accounts, discourse and mathematics classroom interaction: Reflections on qualitative methodology. In R. Kaasila (Ed.), Matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden (pp. 9–34). Rovaniemi, Finland: Lapin yliopistopaino.
Gellert, U. (2011). Now it concerns us! A reaction to sustainable mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 20–21.
Gil, J. (1992–1993). La metodología de investigación mediante grupos de discusión. Enseñanza, X–XI, 199–212.
Giroux, H. (1989). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goetz, J. P., & Lecompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Gómez, P., & Valero, P. (2004). Algunas reflexiones sobre el ICME 10 y el PME 28. Retrieved from http://www.cumbia.ath.cx:591/pna/Archivos/GomezP.
Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1984–1987). The theory of communicative action (2 vols.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Harkness, S. S., D’Ambrosio, B., & Morrone, A. S. (2007). Preservice elementary teachers’ voices describe how their teacher motivated them to do mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 235–254.
Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Swars, S. L., & Smith, M. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education (1995–2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 26–41.
Hough, S., O’Rode, N., Terman, N., & Weissglass, J. (2007). Using concept maps to assess change in teachers’ understandings of algebra: A respectful approach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 23–41.
Hymes, D. (1981). Ethnographic monitoring. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H.-P. Au (Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 56–68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2007). Mathematisation—Demathematisation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Jones-Newton, K. (2009). Instructional practices related to prospective elementary school teachers’ motivation for fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 89–109.
Kaasila, R. (2007). Mathematical biography and key rhetoric. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 66, 373–384.
Kanu, Y. (1997). Understanding development education through action research: Cross-cultural reflections. In T. R. Carson & D. J. Sumara (Eds.), Action research as a living practice (pp. 167–186). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Keitel, C., Kotzmann, E., & Skovsmose, O. (1993). Beyond the tunnel vision: Analysing the relationship between mathematics, society and technology. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 243–279). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kilpatrick, J. (2000). Research in mathematics education across two centuries. In M. A. Clements, H. H. Tairab, & Wong, K. Y. (Eds.), Science, mathematics and technical education in the 20th and 21st centuries (pp. 79–93). Gadong, Brunei Darussalam: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Krainer, K. (1999). PFL-Mathematics: Improving professional practice in mathematics teaching. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 102–112). London, UK: Falmer.
Krainer, K. (2003). Editorial: Teams, communities & networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 93–105.
Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Lanz, C. (1994). El poder en la escuela: El método INVEDECOR como fundamento del currículo alternativo. Caracas, Venezuela: Edit-Art.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, UK: Routledge.
Leavy, A., & O’Loughlin, N. (2006). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the mean: Moving beyond the arithmetic average. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 53–90.
LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Levenson, E., Tsamir, P., & Tirosh, D. (2010). Mathematically based and practically based explanations in the elementary school: Teachers’ preferences. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 345–369.
Li, Q., & Chapman, O. (2010, April). iMovie in prospective secondary mathematics teacher education. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 411–423.
Linn, R. L. (1986). Quantitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 92–118). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 177–196.
Lloyd, G. M. (2006). Preservice teachers’ stories of mathematics classrooms: Explorations of practice through fictional accounts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 57–87.
Lubienski, S. T., & Bowen, A. (2000). Who’s counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626–633.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Messina, G. (1999). Investigación en o acerca de la formación docente: Un estado del arte en los noventa. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 19, n/p.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Mill, J. S. (1975). Three essays on liberty, representative government and the subjection of women. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Morris, A. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471–505.
Moya, A. (2008). Elementos para la construcción de un modelo de evaluación en matemática para el nivel de educación superior (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Caracas, Venezuela.
Neubrand, M., Seago, N., Agudelo-Valderrama, C., DeBlois, L., & Leikin, R. (2009). The balance of teacher knowledge: Mathematics and pedagogy. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI Study (pp. 211–225). New York, NY: Springer.
Noffke, S. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 6–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Osana, H. P., Lacroix, G. I., Tucker, B. J., & Desrosiers, C. (2006). The role of content knowledge and problem features on preservice teachers’ appraisal of elementary mathematics tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 347–380.
Parsons, J. B., & Harding, K. J. (2011). Post-colonial theory and action research. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 1–6.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 391–409.
Renert, M. (2011). Mathematics for life: Sustainable mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(1), 20–26.
Rojas Olaya, A. (2011). El GIDEM: 10 años de revolución en educación matemática. Foro del Futuro, 4, 10–20.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123–140.
Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children’s learning processes: Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 157–185.
Serrano, W. (2010). La educación matemática crítica en el contexto de la sociedad Venezolana: Hacia su filosofía y praxis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Setati, M. (2000). Classroom-based research: From with or on teachers to with and on teachers. In J. F. Matos & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 351–363). Lisbon, Portugal: CIEAFC-Universidade de Lisboa.
Sfard, A. (2005). What could be more practical than good research? On mutual relations between research and practice of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(3), 393–413.
Silva, D. (2010). De lo real a lo formal en matemática (M.A. thesis). Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Caracas, Venezuela.
Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practice of a novice teacher: The role of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 3–28.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Smith, L. M. (1994). Biographical method. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 286–305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Son, J.-W., & Crespo, S. (2009). Prospective teachers’ reasoning and response to a student’s non-traditional strategy when dividing fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 235–261.
Speer, N. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(3), 361–391.
Spivak, G. C. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. London, UK: Routledge.
Spivak, G. C. (2011). Colonidad, capitalismo y descolonización en las sociedades periféricas. In Pensando el mundo desde Bolivia: I ciclo de seminarios internacionales (pp. 311–320). La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125.
Steinbring, H. (1994). Dialogue between theory and practice in mathematics education. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 89–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Steiner, H. G. (1985). Theory of mathematics education: An introduction. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(2), 11–17.
Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 373–394.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sullivan, P., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Swantz, M. L. (1970). Ritual and symbol in transitional Zaramo society with special reference to women. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers’ mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 47–66.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers’ conceptions of multi-digit whole numbers: Refining a framework. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 75, 241–251.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Tirosh, D. (2007). What is research in mathematics teacher education? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(3), 141–144.
Tirosh, D., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Uworwabayeho, A. (2009). Teachers’ innovative change within countrywide reform: A case study in Rwanda. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 315–324.
Vacc, N. B., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers’ changing beliefs and instructional use of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.
Vico, G. (1709). De nostril temporis studiorum ratione. Naples, Italy: Dissertatio.
Vithal, R., & Valero, P. (2003). Researching mathematics education in situations of social and political conflict. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 545–591). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Warman, A., Nolasco, M., Bonfil, G., Olivera, M., & Valencia, E. (1970). De eso que llaman antropología Mexicana. Mexico D. F: Nuestro Tiempo.
Watts, M., & Ebbutt, D. (1987). More than the sum of the parts: Research methods in group interviewing. British Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 25–34.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 139–164.
Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development: The role of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pekhonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: The hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127–147). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Zeichner, K. (2001). Educational action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 273–283). London, UK: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gellert, U., Hernández, R.B., Chapman, O. (2012). Research Methods in Mathematics Teacher Education. In: Clements, M., Bishop, A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F. (eds) Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4684-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)