Skip to main content

Interpretations of the Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Astronomy and the Climate Crisis

Part of the book series: Astronomers' Universe ((ASTRONOM))

  • 863 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the earnest and best efforts of scientists, the sheer complexity of the subject makes precise agreement between studies, types of research, quality and interpretations of the data subject to any number of differences and disagreements between colleagues. The passion that climate science has generated has sometimes tended to make these become personal, especially when reputations are on the line and hard sought research has taken years of dedicated work. As such, climate science has not been without its star players, who have found themselves either embraced or becoming targets of the opposite side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hansen J, Soto M, Khareshka P, von Schuckmann K (2011) ‘Earth’s energy imbalance and implication. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). Atoms Chem Phys 11:13421–13499

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hansen J, Johnson D, Lacis A, Lebedeff S, Lee P, Rind D, Russell G (1981) Climate impact of increasing carbon dioxide. Science 213(4511):957–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen J, Lebedeff S (1987) Global trends of measured surface air temperature. J Astrophys Res 92(D11):13345–13372

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen J, Ruedy R, Sato M, Lo K (2011) 2010 global surface temperature change. Rev Geophys 48:RG4004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brohan P, Kennedy JJ, Harris I, Tett SFB, Jones PD (2006) Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperatures: a new data set from 1850. J Geogr Res 111(D12):D12106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen J, Ruedy R, Glascoe J, Sato M (1999) GISS analysis of surface temperature change of 1999. Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). J Geophys Res 104:30997–31022

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen J, Ruedy R, Sato M, Imhoff M, Lawrence W, Easterling D, Peterson T, Karl T (2001) A closer look at United States and global surface temperature change. Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). J Geophys Res 106:23947–23963

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook J (2010) Empirical evidence that humans are causing global warming. Skept Sci. 2010 http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

  9. Harries JE, Brindley HE, Sagoo PJ, Bantges RJ (2001) Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997. Nature 410(6826):355–357; Griggs JA, Harries JE (2004) Comparisons of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. Proc SPIE 5543:164

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qing-Bin Lu (2010) What is the major culprit for global warming: CFC’s or CO2? J Cosmol 8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang K, Liang S (2009) Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all-sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. J Atmos Phys 114:D19101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans WFJ, Puckrin E (2006) Measurements of the radiative surface forcing of climate. In: 18th conference on climate variability and change 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lindzen RS (2005) Understanding common climate claims. Draft paper for 2005 Erice meeting of the world federation of scientists on global emergencies. eproceedings.worldscinet.com/9789812773890/9789812773890_0016.html, pp. 189–210

  14. Spencer RW, Braswell WD (2008) Potential biases in feedback diagnosis from observational data: a simple model demonstration. J Clim 21(21):5624–5628; Spencer RW, Braswell WD (2010) On the diagnosis of radiative feedbacks in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. J Geophys Res 115:D16109; Spencer RW, Braswell WD, Hall C (2011) On the misdiagnosis of surface temperature feedbacks from variations in Earth’s radiant energy balance. Remote Sens 3(8):1603–1613

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mörner N-A (2004) IPCC again. INQUA commission on sea level changes and coastal evalution, 25 July 2004. http://www.pog.su.se/sea/HP-14.+IPCC-3.pdf

  16. Beenstock M, Reingewertz Y (2010) Polynomial cointegration tests of the anthropogenic theory of global warming. Department of Economics, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, von Schuckmann K (2011) Earth’s energy imbalance and implication. Atmos Chem Phys 11:13421–13449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunter L (2007) Bright sun, warm Earth. Coincidence? National Post, 12 March 2007. http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=551bfe58-882f4889-ab76-5cel02dced7

  19. How do human activities contribute to climate change and how do they compare with natural influences? NOAA. oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/pd/climate/factsheets/howhuman.pdf

  20. Global warming myths and facts. Environmental Defense Fund. http://www.fightglobalwarming.com/page.cfm?tagID=274; National Resources Defense Council. NRDC. www.nrdc.org

  21. Global warming petition project. http://www.petitionproject.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooke, A. (2012). Interpretations of the Data. In: Astronomy and the Climate Crisis. Astronomers' Universe. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4608-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics