Skip to main content

Diagnosing Policy Problem Situations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 179))

Abstract

As argued in Chap. 2, policy processes are multi-faceted and may display a wide variety of characteristics. Consequently, policy analysis in a multi-actor context needs to be contingent, multi-faceted, and pluriform. The concluding section of Chap. 2 articulated a wide array of requirements for good policy analysis. Chapter 3 outlined a conceptualization of the variety of different activities and associated purposes policy analysts may engage in. Which of these are most appropriate and which less so depends on the characteristics of the situation and on the ambitions of the client and of the analyst. Both chapters set the scene for the question: Given a specific policy situation, what requirements and type(s) of policy analytic activities are essential for achieving the purposes of client and analyst? In other words, how can an analyst make a reasoned design of his/her interventions? This will be the subject of Chap. 5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sometimes there is no clear diagnosis in medical practice, but only a suspicion about the illness to be cured, and either no treatment or a tentative treatment is chosen, to explore its effects and perhaps adapt treatment after some time. Analogous situations occur in policy processes as well.

  2. 2.

    A factor is an attribute of an entity (a thing, a person, a process) for which a value can be established on a scale via direct or indirect measurement.

  3. 3.

    Different systems traditions have developed different conventions regarding where to put the different types of influences in the visualization. In control systems engineering, the controls are put entering from the left side; while in the field of information systems, the controls are generally put on top, entering from above [like in the Structured Analysis and Design Technique (Marca and McGowan 1988)]. We will use the latter convention.

References

  • Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future: a systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bots PWG, van Twist MJW, van Duin JHR (2000) Automatic pattern detection in stakeholder networks. In: Nunamaker JF, Sprague RH (eds) Proceedings HICSS-33. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos. See also http://dana.actoranalysis.com for examples

  • Bryson JM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag Rev 6(1):21–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn JA, Porter AL (2004) The education of a technology policy analyst to process management. Technol Anal Strategic Management 16(2):261–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn W (1994) Public policy analysis: an introduction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1989) Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In: Rosenhead J (ed) Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Enserink B, Hermans L, Kwakkel J, Thissen W, Koppenjan J, Bots P (2010) Policy analysis of multi-actor systems. Lemma, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Keeney RL (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manage Sci 40(8):1035–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans LM (2005) Actor analysis for water resources management. Putting the promise into practice. Eburon Publishers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans L, Thissen W (2009) Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):808–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillestad R, Walker WE, Carrillo M, Bolten JG, Twaalfhoven PGJ, van de Riet O (1996) FORWARD–Freight options for road, water, and rail for the Dutch: final report, MR-736-EAC/VW, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R (1995) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowl Policy Int J Knowl Transfer Utilization 8(4):40–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede GH, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organisations: software for the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Gregory RS (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper Res 53:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DP (2007) Impact significance determination—designing an approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(8):730–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marca D, McGowan C (1988) SADT: structured analysis and design technique. McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer I (1997) Debating technologies. A methodological contribution to the design and evaluation of participatory policy analysis. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q-methodology. Series: quantitative applications in the social sciences, Number 07-066. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalko M (2001) Cracking creativity: the secrets of creative genius. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Miser H, Quade E (eds) (1985) Handbook of systems analysis: overview of use, procedures, applications, and practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff I (1983) Stakeholders of the organzational mind. Toward a new view of organizational policy making. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade ES (1989) Analysis for public decisions, 3rd edn. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • RAND Europe (1997) A policy analysis of civil aviation infrastructure options in the Netherlands, DRU-1512-VW/VROM/EZ. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetvedt H (2006) The multiple logics of decision-making. Eur Polit Sci 5:193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21(2):129–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage AP, Armstrong JE Jr (2000) Introduction to systems engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans JS (2004) Purposive interaction in multi-actor decision making. Eburon Publishers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Lei T, Enserink B, Thissen W, Bekebrede G (2011) How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers. J Oper Res Soc 62(7):1391–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eeten MJG (2001) Recasting intractable policy issues: the wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. J Policy Anal Manag 20(3):391–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE (1988) Chapter 6: Generating and screening alternatives. In Miser HJ, Quade ES (eds) Handbook of systems analysis: craft issues and procedural choices. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE (2000) Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. J Multicriteria Decis Anal 9(1–3):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible CM, Sabatier PA (2006) A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In: Fisher F, Miller G, Sidney M (eds) Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory politics and methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 123–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1979) Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Little Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wil A. H. Thissen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thissen, W.A.H. (2013). Diagnosing Policy Problem Situations. In: Thissen, W., Walker, W. (eds) Public Policy Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 179. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4602-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics