Skip to main content

Partner Violence as a Rational Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partner Violence

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality ((SSHE))

Abstract

The basic assumption in this chapter is that the decision to use violence should be considered as a rational choice if it meets the following preconditions: that the violence is possible and has the potential to accomplish the goal, that the cost of violence is lower than the cost of other possible actions, as well as being lower than the value of the goal. This basic assumption is scrutinized throughout the chapter, especially its applicability to partner violence based on research and case descriptions. Additional characteristics of partner violence events and their consistency with the assumption of rational choice are examined. For example, the validity of the rational choice argument is discussed in relation to the perpetrator’s strong negative emotional experiences and lost or low self-control. It is concluded that strong emotions and loss of control do not only stand in contradiction to the rational choice argument but also might even support it. Finally, supporting and extending the argument that violence is chosen rationally, an extended theory of deterrence is presented and its application to partner violence is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berkowitz, L. (1993). Pain and aggression: Some findings and implications. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biaggio, M. K. (1989). Sex differences in behavioral reactions to provocation of anger. Psychological Reports, 64, 23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R., Lovas, G. S., & Hay, D. H. (1995). Sex differences in anger and fear as a function of situational context. Sex Roles, 32(1–2), 47–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2005). Aggression. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 628–652). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J. J., Mumme, D. L., Kermoian, R., & Campos, R. G. (1994). A functional perspective on the nature of emotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3, Serial No. 240), 284–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Age and sex effects of emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21, 542–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., Baldwin, M., Collins, L., Patterson, S., & Benditt, R. (1999). Anger in close relationships: an interpersonal script analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Sex differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., & John, O. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johns C. H. W. (2000). The oldest code of laws in the world: the code of laws promulgated by Hammurabi, King of Babylon, B.C. City: Lawbook Exchange Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potegal, M., & Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in childhood anger and aggression. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 513–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stapley, J. C., & Haviland, J. M. (1989). Beyond depression: Sex differences in normal adolescents’ emotional experiences. Sex Roles, 20(5–6), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, C. E., & Dutton, D. G. (1992). The role of power and sex in anger responses to sexual jealousy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1721–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (2006 [1980]). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NY & New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books. (Reissued by Transaction Publishing, 2006 [New Brunswick, NJ], with a new foreword by R. J. Gelles and M. A. Straus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P. (1990). Assessing individual differences in proneness to shame and guilt: Development of the self-conscious affect and attribution inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. R. (2005). Arrest and intimate partner violence: Toward a more complete application of deterrence theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z. (2007). Perceptions, emotions, and behavioral decisions in conflicts that escalate to violence. Motivation and Emotion, 31(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z. (in press). Deterrence of men in the general population from using aggression toward their female partners. Sociological Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z., Eisikovits, Z., & Gelles, R. (2002). Structure and dynamics of escalation from the batterer’s perspective. Families in Society, 83(2), 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintre, M. G., Polivy, J., & Murray, M. A. (1990). Self-predictions of emotional response patterns: Age, sex, and situational determinants. Child Development, 61, 1124–1133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winstok, Z. (2013). Partner Violence as a Rational Choice. In: Partner Violence. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4568-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics