Abstract
Many prosimians eat animal food, including arthropods and small vertebrates. This chapter explores the clues prosimians rely on to detect and identify animal prey, and their sensory adaptations for predation. Available observational and experimental datasets suggest that acoustic and visual (especially motion) cues, as well as olfactory and tactile ones, to a lesser degree, play a role. Different sensory channels are likely to operate in prey perception over different distances. It appears that acoustic cues first draw the animal’s attention to prey at a distance, while visual cues are used for precise localization at closer range, and olfactory cues operate at very close range to allow the animal to abandon attacks on unpalatable arthropods. Future work should address the role of sensory ecology in shaping prey selection and resource partitioning in prosimians.
Resume
De nombreux prosimiens se nourrissent de la nourriture animale comme les arthropodes et les petits vertébrés. Ce chapitre explore les indices des prosimiens sur la capacité de détecter et classifier les proies animales et les adaptations sensorielles à la prédation chez les prosimiens. L’ensemble des données expérimentales et celles observées suggèrent que les signaux acoustiques et visuels (spécialement les mouvements) et dans la moindre mesure, les signaux olfactifs et tactiles jouent un rôle. Ainsi différents canaux sensoriels fonctionneraient probablement pour la perception des proies sur des distances différentes. En théorie, les signaux acoustiques sont les premiers à attirer l’attention de l’animale sur une proie à grande distance, par contre les signaux visuels sont utilisés pour la localisation précise des proies qui se trouvent à une distance très proche alors que les signaux olfactifs sont potentiellement utilisées à de très courte distance pour abandonner les attaques sur les arthropodes désagréables. En perspectives, je suggère d’aborder le rôle de l’écologie sensorielle pour façonner la sélection des proies et l’allocation des ressources chez prosimiens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernays EA, Wcislo WT (1994) Sensory capabilities, information processing and resource specialization. Q Rev Biol 69:187–204
Cartmill M (1972) Arboreal adaptations and the origin of the order primates. In: Tuttle R (ed) The functional and evolutionary biology of the primates. Aldine Atherton, Chicago, pp 97–122
Cartmill M (1974) Rethinking primate origins. Science 184:436–443
Cartmill M (1992) New views on primate origins. Evol Anthropol 1:105–111
Charles-Dominique P, Martin RD (1972) Behaviour and ecology of nocturnal prosimians: field studies in Gabon and Madagascar. Parey, Berlin
Churchfield S (1990) The natural history of shrews. Comstock, Ithaca
Charles-Dominique P (1977) Ecology and behaviour of nocturnal primates. Columbia University Press, New York
Cochran B, Mouritsen H, Wikelski M (2004) Migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from twilight cues. Science 304:405–408
Coleman MN, Ross CF (2004) Primate auditory diversity and its influence on hearing performance. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 281A:1123–1137
Crompton RH (1995) Visual predation, habitat structure and the ancestral primate niche. In: Alterman L, Doyle GA, Izard MK (eds) Creatures of the dark: the nocturnal prosimians. Plenum, New York, pp 11–30
Dkhissi-Benyahya O, Szel A, Degrip WJ, Cooper HM (2001) Short and mid-wavelength cone distribution in a nocturnal strepsirhine primate (Microcebus murinus). J Comp Neurol 438:490–504
Dominy NJ, Lucas PW, Osorio D, Yamashita N (2001) The sensory ecology of primate food perception. Evol Anthropol 10:171–186
Doyle GA (1974) Behavior of prosimians. In: Schrier AM, Stollnitz F (eds) Behavior of nonhuman primates. Academic, New York, pp 155–353
von der Emde G, Bleckmann H (1998) Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. J Exp Biol 201:969–980
Endler JA (1991) Interactions between predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169–196
Erickson CJ (1991) Percussive foraging in the aye-aye, Daubentonia madagascarensis. Anim Behav 41:793–801
Erickson CJ (1994) Tap-scanning and extractive foraging in aye-ayes, Daubentonia madagascarensis. Folia Primatol 62:125–135
Erickson CJ, Nowicki S, Dollar L, Goehring N (1998) Percussive foraging: stimuli for prey location by aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascarensis). Int J Primatol 19:111–122
Faure PA, Barclay RMR (1992) The sensory basis of prey detection by the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis, and the consequences for prey selection. Anim Behav 44:31–39
Goerlitz HR, Siemers BM (2007) Sensory ecology of prey rustling sounds: acoustical features and their classification by wild Grey Mouse Lemurs. Funct Ecol 21:143–153
Goerlitz HR, Greif S, Siemers BM (2008) Cues for acoustic detection of prey: insect rustling sounds and the influence of walking substrate. J Exp Biol 211:2799–2806
Gursky-Doyen SL (2010) The function of scentmarking in spectral tarsiers. In: Gursky SL, Supriatna J (eds) Indonesian primates. Springer, New York, pp 359–369
Heesy CP, Kamilar JM, Willms J (2011) Retinogeniculostriate pathway components scale with orbit convergence only in primates and not in other mammals. Brain Behav Evol 77:105–115
Hladik CM (1979) Diet and ecology of prosimians. In: Doyle GA, Martin RD (eds) The study of prosimian behavior. Academic, New York, pp 307–357
Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228
Jones G, Webb PI, Sedgeley JA, O’Donnell CFJ (2003) Mysterious Mystacina: how the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) locates insect prey. J Exp Biol 206: 4209–4216
Kirk CE (2004) Comparative morphology of the eye in primates. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 281A:1095–1103
MacKinnon J, MacKinnon K (1980) The behaviour of wild spectral tarsiers. Int J Primatol 1:361–379
Martin RD (1972) A preliminary field-study of the lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus J. F. Miller 1777). In: Charles-Dominique P, Martin RD (eds) Behaviour and ecology of nocturnal prosimians. Field studies in Gabon and Madagascar. Parey, Berlin, pp 43–85
Muchlinski MN (2010) Ecological correlates of infraorbital foramen area in primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 141:131–141
Nekaris KAI (2005) Foraging behaviour of the slender loris (Loris lydekkerianus lydekkerianus): implications for theories of primate origins. J Hum Evol 49:289–300
Niemitz C (1979) Outline of the behavior of Tarsius bancanus. In: Doyle GA, Martin R (eds) The study of prosimian behavior. Academic, New York
Obrist MK, Fenton MB, Eger JL, Schlegel PA (1993) What ears do for bats: a comparative study of pinna sound pressure transformation in Chiroptera. J Exp Biol 180:119–152
Palagi E, Telara S, Tarli SMB (2004) Reproductive strategies in Lemur catta: balance among sending, receiving, and countermarking scent signals. Int J Primatol 25:1019–1031
Piep M, Radespiel U, Zimmermann E, Schmidt S, Siemers BM (2008) The sensory basis of prey detection in captive-born grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus). Anim Behav 75:871–878
Ramsier MA, Dominy NJ (2010) A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and behavioral estimates of hearing sensitivity in Lemur catta and Nycticebus coucang. Am J Primatol 72:217–233
Safi K, Siemers BM (2010) Implications of sensory ecology for species coexistence: biased perception links predator diversity to prey size distribution. Evol Ecol 24:703–713
Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ross CF (2000) Into the light: the origin of Anthropoidea. Annu Rev Anthropol 29:147–194
Siemers BM, Schnitzler HU (2004) Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species. Nature 429:657–661
Siemers BM, Güttinger R (2006) Prey conspicuousness can explain apparent prey selectivity. Curr Biol 16:R157–R159
Siemers BM, Swift SM (2006) Differences in sensory ecology contribute to resource partitioning in the bats Myotis bechsteinii and Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:373–380
Siemers BM, Goerlitz HR, Robsomanitrandrasana E, Piep M, Ramanamanjato JB, Rakotondravony D, Ramilijaona O, Ganzhorn JU (2007) Sensory basis of food detection in wild Microcebus murinus. Int J Primatol 28:291–304
Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59:222–230
Williams BA, Kay RF, Kirk EC (2010) New perspectives on anthropoid origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4797–4804
Acknowledgments
I thank the following colleagues for cooperation and support in researching the sensory ecology of mouse lemurs: Holger Goerlitz, Marcus Piep, Eric Robsomanitrandrasana, Jörg Ganzhorn, Ute Radespiel, Sabine Schmidt, Elke Zimmermann, Jean-Baptiste Ramanamanjato, Daniel Rakotondravony, Olga Ramilijaona, and Manon Vincelette. This work and associated discussions and reading provided the basis for this summary chapter. Thanks to Nathaniel Dominy for organizing the “sensory and cognitive ecology symposium” with me at Ithala and for many inspiring discussions. I am grateful to Judith Masters for making the splendid conference and this volume possible. Bakri Nadhurou provided the French translation of the summary.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siemers, B.M. (2012). The Sensory Ecology of Foraging for Animal Prey. In: Masters, J., Gamba, M., Génin, F. (eds) Leaping Ahead. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4511-1_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4511-1_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4510-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4511-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)