Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in EuropeAn:Introduction

Chapter

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) is one of the most rapidly developing policy areas in Europe, where significant institutional change and innovation have taken place over the last two decades throughout the continent. In contrast to mainstream policy fields (e.g., pensions, labor market policies, and health care), where attempts to reduce public intervention has been the most common trend (Castles, The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, 2004, Policy and Politics, 33(3), 411–430, 2005; Korpi and Palme, American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446, 2003; Pierson, The New Politics of the Welfare State, 2001), LTC has seen a broader scope of transformations, ranging from retrenchment and cost containment to a growth in public financing and an expansion of coverage. In many European countries, LTC policies over the last two decades have been characterized by a recognition of social rights on the one hand and yet increasing social responsibilities on the other (Morel, The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States, 2006). This book is aimed at describing these general trends, identifying the factors, which explain these broad developments, highlighting both the main differences between European countries and outlining the main consequences of the various policy developments that have taken place.

Keywords

Manifold Europe Attenuation Transportation Income 

References

  1. Alber, J. (1995). A framework for the comparative study of social services. Journal of European Social Policy, 5(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anttonen, A., & Sipila, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ascoli, U., & Ranci, C. (Eds.). (2002). Dilemmas of the welfare mix. The new structure of welfare in an era of privatization. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, W. J. (1996). Children of performing arts, the economic dilemma: The climbing costs of health care and education. Journal of Cultural Economics, 20, 183–206.Google Scholar
  5. Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonoli, G. (2006). New social risks and the politics of post-industrial social policies. In K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.), The politics of post-industrial welfare states. Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks (pp. 3–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burau, V., Theobald, H., & Blank, R. H. (2007). Governing home care: A cross national comparison. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (Eds.). (2009). European and North American policy change. Drivers and dynamics. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Castles, F. G. (2004). The future of the welfare state: Crisis myths and crisis realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castles, F. G. (2005). Social expenditure in the 1990s: Data and determinants. Policy and Politics, 33(3), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clasen, J., & Siegel, N. (Eds.). (2007). Investigating welfare state change. Cheltenham: Edgar.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, G., & Ranci, C. (2010). Disability and caregiving: A step toward social vulnerability. In C. Ranci (Ed.). Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks (pp. 159–185). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 286–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The modern social conflict. An essay on the politics of liberty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Daly M., & Lewis, J. (1998). Introduction: Conceptualizing social care in the context of welfare state restructuring. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Gender, social care and welfare state restructuring in Europe (pp. 1–24). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evers, A., Pijl, M., & Ungerson, C. (Eds.). (1994). Payments for care. A comparative overview. Brookfield: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare. European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Finch, J. (1989). Family obligations and social change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Finch, J., & Groves, D. (Eds.). (1983). A labour of love: Women, work and caring. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hacker, J. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy-making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, P., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heclo, H., & Wildavsky, A. (1974). The private government of public money. Community and policy inside British politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, C. (2008). Worlds of welfare services and transfers. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–1995. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knijn, T., & Ungerson, C. (1997). Introduction: Care work and gender in welfare regimes. Social Politics, 4(3), 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lafortune, G., & Balestat, G. (2007). Trends in severe disability among elderly people: Assessing the evidence in 12 OECD countries and the future implications (OECD Health Working Paper No. 26). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamura, G., Melchiorre, G., Quattrini, S., Balducci, C., Spazzafumo, L., & Barbagallo, M. (2003). Eurofamcare. Giornale di Gerontologia, 52, 5.Google Scholar
  30. Leira, A. (1992). Welfare States and Working Mothers: The Scandinavian Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leira, A., & Saraceno, C. (2004). Care: Actors, relationships and contexts. The multidimensional concept of care. In B. Hobson, J. Lewis, & B. Siim (Eds.), Contested concepts in gender and social politics (pp. 55–83). London: Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Lundquist, L. J. (1980). The hare and the tortoise: Clean air policies in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Malley, J., & Fernández, J.-L. (2010). Measuring quality in social care services: Theory and practice. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(4), 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Morel, N. (2006). Providing coverage against new social risks in Bismarckian welfare states: The case of long-term care. In K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.), The politics of post-industrial welfare states. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. O’Connor, J. S. (1993). Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes: Theoretical and methodological issues. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(4), 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Österle, A. (2001). Equity choices and long-term-care policies in Europe. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Palier, B. (Ed.). (2010). A long good-bye to Bismarck. The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pauly, M. (1990). The rational nonpurchase of long-term-care insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 98(1), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pavolini, E., & Ranci, C. (2008). Restructuring the welfare state: Reforms in long-term care in western European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 3, 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfau-Effinger, B., Flaquer, L., & Jensen, P. H. (2009). Formal and informal work. The hidden work regime in Europe. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ranci, C. (Ed.). (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  45. Rauch, D. (2007). Is there really a Scandinavian social service model? Acta Sociologica, 50, 249–269.Google Scholar
  46. Rostgaard, T. (2002). Caring for children and older people in Europe—A comparison of European policies and practices’. Policy Studies, 23(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented choice. Policy Sciences, 21(1), 56–71.Google Scholar
  48. Saraceno, C. (2008a). Gender and care: Old solutions, new developments? Annual Hirschman Lecture delivered at the European University in Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  49. Saraceno, C. (Ed.). (2008b). Families, ageing and social policy. Intergenerational solidarity in European welfare states. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Simonazzi, A. (2009). Care regimes and national employment models. The Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New risks, new welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ungerson, C. (1997). Social politics and the commodification of care. Social Politics, 4(3), 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ungerson, C., & Yeandle, S. (Eds.). (2007). Cash for care in developed welfare states. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi SocialiMacerata UniversityMacerataItaly
  2. 2.Department of Architecture and Urban StudiesPolytechnic of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations