Stiction Failure in Microswitches Due to Elasto-Plastic Adhesive Contacts

  • Ling Wu
  • Jean-Claude Golinval
  • Ludovic NoelsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)


Undesirable stiction, which results from the contact between surfaces, is a major failure mode in micro-switches. Indeed the adhesive forces can become so important that the two surfaces remain permanently glued, limiting the life-time of the MEMS. This is especially true when the contact happens between surfaces where elasto-plastic asperities deform permanently until the surfaces reach plastic accommodation, increasing the surface forces. To predict this behavior, a micro adhesive-contact model is developed, which accounts for the surfaces topography evolutions during elasto-plastic contacts. This model can be used at a higher scale to study the MEMS behavior, and thus its life-time. The MEMS devices studied here are assumed to work in a dry environment. In these operating conditions only the Van der Waals forces have to be considered for adhesion. For illustration purpose, an electrostatic-structural analysis is performed on a micro-switch. To determine the degree of plasticity involved, the impact energy of the movable electrode at pull-in is estimated. Thus the maximal adhesive force is predicted using the developed model.


Adhesion Effect Asperity Height Single Asperity Movable Electrode Plastic Accommodation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Van Spengen W, Puers R, DeWolf I (2003) On the physics of stiction and its impact on the reliability of microstructures. J Adhes Sci Technol 17(4):563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Do C, Hill M, Lishchynska M, Cychowski M, Delaney K (2011) Modeling, simulation and validation of the dynamic performance of a single-pole single-throw RF-MEMS contact switch. In: 2011 12th international conference on thermal, mechanical and multi-physics simulation, and experiments in microelectronics and microsystems (EuroSimE), Linz, Austria, April 2011, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu L, Noels L, Rochus V, Pustan M, Golinval J-C (2011) A micro-macroapproach to predict stiction due to surface contact in microelectromechanical systems. J Microelectromech Syst 20(4):976–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu L, Rochus V, Noels L, Golinval J-C (2009) Influence of adhesive rough surface contact on microswitches. J Appl Phys 106(11):113502-1–113502-10Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson K, Kendall K, Roberts A (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 324(1558):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derjaguin B, Muller V, Toporov Y (1975) Effect of contact deformation on the adhesion of elastic solids. J Colloid Interface Sci 53(2):314–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maugis D (1992) Adhesion of spheres: the JKRDMT transition using a Dugdale model. J Colloid Interface Sci 150(1):243–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim K, McMeeking R, Johnson K (1998) Adhesion, slip, cohesive zones and energy fluxes for elastic spheres in contact. J Mech Phys Solids 46(2):243–266MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenwood J, Williamson J (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 295(1442):300–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenwood J, Tripp J (1971) The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1847–1996 185(1970):625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones R (2004) Models for contact loading and unloading of a rough surface. Int J Eng Sci 42(17–18):1931–1947zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams J (2005) The influence of repeated loading, residual stresses and shakedown on the behaviour of tribological contacts. Tribol Int 38(9):786–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Majumder S, McGruer N, Adams G, Zavracky P, Morrison R, Krim J (2001) Study of contacts in an electrostatically actuated microswitch. Sens Actuat A Phys 93(1):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu L, Golinval J-C, Noels L. A micro model for elasto-plastic adhesive-contact in micro-switches. Tribol Int (submitted)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chang W, Etsion I, Bogy D (1987) An elasticplastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol 109(2):257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jackson R, Green I (2005) A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J Tribol 127(2):343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Etsion I, Kligerman Y, Kadin Y (2005) Unloading of an elastic–plastic loaded spherical contact. Int J Solids Struct 42(13):3716–3729zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kadin Y, Kligerman Y, Etsion I (2007) Cyclic loading of an elasticplastic adhesive spherical microcontact. J Appl Phys 104(7):073522-1–073522-8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Du Y, Chen L, McGruer N, Adams G, Etsion I (2007) A finite element model of loading and unloading of an asperity contact with adhesion and plasticity. J Colloid Interface Sci 312(2):522–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of LiegeLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.School of AeronauticsNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations