The New Science and Engineering Management: Cooperative Research Centers as Intermediary Organizations for Government Policies and Industry Strategies

Chapter

Abstract

The US Small Business Administration defines intermediary organizations as those that facilitate linkages and cooperation among businesses and between firms and government and nonprofit organizations such as universities, local chambers of commerce, community groups, and state and local government. The term has been used to characterize boundary-spanning management in a broad range of areas, from firm collaboration for innovation and manufacturing, to the joint provision of public education, to the development of improvements in community building, agriculture, and mortgage-lending practices. The term is relatively new, but research and theory on intermediary organizations is not new to policy scholars and organizational economists focused on scientific and technical innovation, e.g., the extant literatures on the design and development of bridging institutions for innovation-based economic development including technology transfer offices, research parks, technology incubators, industry consortia, and what we broadly refer to as cooperative research centers or “CRCs”—which promote collaborative, cross-sector research and development for technological innovation, commercialization and, ultimately, social and economic outcomes.

Keywords

Europe Marketing Coherence Expense Posit 

References

  1. Adams JD, Chiang EP, Starkey K (2001) Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers. J Technol Transf 26:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson-Grosjean J, House D, Fisher D (2001) Canadian science policy and public research organisations in the 20th century. Sci Stud 14(1):3–26Google Scholar
  3. Baldini N (2008) Negative effects of university patenting: myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics 75(2):289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batonda G, Perry C (2003) Approaches to relationship development processes in inter-firm ­networks. Eur J Market 37(10):1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker S, Gordon G (1966) An entrepreneurial theory of formal organizations. Adm Sci Q 11:315–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behrens T, Gray DO (2001) Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcomes. Res Policy 30:179–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya S, Arora P (2007) Industrial linkages in Indian universities: what they reveal and what they imply. Scientometrics 70(2):277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block F, Miller MR (2008) Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the U.S. national innovation system, 1970–2006. http://www.itif.org/index.php?s=policy_issues&c=Science-and-R38D-Policy
  10. Boardman C (2009) Government centrality in university-industry interactions: university research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Res Policy 38:1505–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boardman C (2012) Organizational capital in boundary-spanning collaborations: internal and external approaches to organizational structure and personnel authority. J Public Admin Res Theory 22:497–526Google Scholar
  12. Boardman C, Bozeman B (2007) Role strain in university research centers. J High Educ 78(4):430–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boardman C, Corley E (2008) University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Res Policy 37:900–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boardman C, Ponomariov B (2010) The cooperative mission of defense R&D in the U.S.: detecting consistency and change in the roles of the federal laboratories. In: James A (ed) Re-evaluating defense R&D and innovation dynamics. Edward Elgar Press, Northampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Bozeman B, Boardman C (2003) Managing the new multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: institutional innovation in the academic community. IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Bozeman B, Boardman C (2004) The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the University-Industry Research Revolution. J Technol Transf 29(3–4):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bozeman B, Dietz J (2001) Research policy trends in the United States: civilian technology programs, defense technology and the deployment of the national laboratories. In: Laredo P, Mustar P (eds) Research and innovation policies in the new global economy: an international comparative analysis. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Bozeman B, Dietz J, Gaughan M (1999) Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. Int J Technol Manage 22(7–8):716–740Google Scholar
  19. Bozeman B, Dietz JS, Gaughan M (2001) Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative approach to R&D evaluation. Int J Technol Manage 22(8):716–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Busom I, Fernandez-Ribas A (2008) The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Res Policy 37(2):240–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cano CP, Cano PQ (2006) Human resource management and its impact on innovation performance in companies. Int J Technol Manage 35:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carayannis EG (1999) Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management. Technovation 19(4):219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carayol N (2003) Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Res Policy 32:887–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Coburn C (1995) Partnerships. Battelle, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive-capacity—a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cohen W, Florida R, Goe WR (1994) University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  29. Corley E, Gaughan M (2005) Scientists’ participation in university research centers: what are the gender differences? J Technol Transf 30(4):371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Corley EA, Boardman C, Bozeman B (2006) Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: theoretical implications from two case studies. Res Policy 35(7):975–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Am Econ Rev 78(5):1133–1137Google Scholar
  32. Dietz JS, Bozeman B (2005) Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 34(3):349–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dill DD (1990) University/industry research collaborations: an analysis of inter-organizational relationships. R&D Manage 20(2):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doz YL, Olk PM, Ring PS (2000) Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Manage J 21(3):239–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Etzkowitz H (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Res Policy 27(2):109–123Google Scholar
  36. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1998) The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university–industry–government relations. Minerva 36:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 29(2):109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) (2006) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Feller I, Ailes CP, Roessner JD (2002) Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from Engineering Research Centers. Res Policy 31:457–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedman RS, Friedman RC (1982) The role of organized research units in academic science. National Science Foundation Report, NTIS PB 82-253394Google Scholar
  41. Geiger RL (1990) Organized research units: their role in the development of university research. J High Educ 61(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scoot P (1994) The new production of knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  43. Gopalakrishnan S, Santoro MD (2004) Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 51(1):57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Granovetter M (1985) Economic-action and social-structure—the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gray DO (2000) Government-sponsored industry-university cooperative research: an analysis of cooperative research center evaluation approaches. Res Eval 8:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gray D (2009) Making team science better: applying improvement-oriented evaluation principles to evaluation of cooperative research centers. New Dir Eval 118:73–87Google Scholar
  47. Gray DO (2011) Cross-sector research collaboration in the USA: A national innovation systems perspective. Sci Public Policy 38:123–133Google Scholar
  48. Gray DO, Walters SG (eds) (1998) Managing the industry-university cooperative research center: a guide for directors and other stakeholders. Battelle, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  49. Gray D, Johnson E, Gidley T (1986) Industry-university projects and centers: an empirical comparison of two federally funded models of cooperative science. Eval Rev 10:776–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gray D, Lindblad M, Rudolph J (2001) Industry-university research centers: a multivariate analysis of member retention. J Technol Transf 26(3):247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do inter-organizational networks come from? Am J Sociol 104(5):1439–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gulbransen M, Mowery D, Feldman M (2011) Introduction to the special section: heterogeneity and university-industry relations. Res Policy 40:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Guston D (2000) Between politics and science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hagedoorn J, Link AN, Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships. Res Policy 29(4, 5):567–586Google Scholar
  55. Harrington KR (1985) Strategies for joint ventures. Lexington Books, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
  56. Heide JB (1994) Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. J Market 58:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Howells J (1990) The internationalization of R & D and the development of global research networks. Reg Stud 24:495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Howells J (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res Policy 35:715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ikenberry SO, Friedman RC (1972) Beyond academic departments. Jossey-Bass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Innovosource (2011) Industry perspectives on university relationships. Web-based report accessed on 12 Dec 2011 at http://www.innovosource.com/shareddocuments/U_I_survey_CFR_innovosource.pdf
  61. Katz ML (1986) An analysis of cooperative research and development. Rand J Econ 17(4):527–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Manage J 9(4):319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lal B, Boardman PC, Deshmukh-Towery N, Link J (2007) Designing the future generation of NSF Engineering Research Centers: insights from worldwide practice. Science and Technology Policy Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. Laursen K (2002) The importance of sectoral differences in the application of complementary HRM practices for innovation performance. Int J Econ Bus 9(1):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laursen K, Foss NJ (2003) New HRM practices, complementarities, and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge J Econ 27(2):243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ Sci 7(4):428–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Link A, Scott J (2001) Public/private partnerships: stimulating competition in a dynamic market. Int J Ind Organ 19:763–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Res Policy 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moutinho P, Fontes M, Godinho M (2007) Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations. Scientometrics 70(2):355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nooteboom B (2000) Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems. Organ Stud 21(5):915–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oliver C (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Acad Manage Rev 15(2):241–265Google Scholar
  72. Olk P, Earley C (1996) Rediscovering the individual in the formation of international joint ventures. Res Sociol Organ 14:223–261Google Scholar
  73. Owen-Smith J (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Res Policy 32(6):1081–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The external control of organizations. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Ponomariov B, Boardman C (2010) Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: university research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 39(5):613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336Google Scholar
  77. Powell WW, Koput KW, SmithDoerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41(1):116–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prager DJ, Omen G (1980) Research, innovation and university-industry linkages. Science 207:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competencies of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev May–June:79–91Google Scholar
  80. Ring PS, van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manage Rev 19(1):90–118Google Scholar
  81. Russo J (1990) Factors affecting the transfer of technology from industry/university cooperatives to sponsoring companies. J Technol Transf 15(3):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Santoro MD, Chakrabarti AK (2002) Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Res Policy 31:1163–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Santoro MD, Gopalakrishnan S (2001) Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: their impact on technology transfer activities. J Technol Transf 26(1/2):163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sanz-Menendez L, Cruz-Castro L (2003) Coping with environmental pressures: public research organisations responses to funding crises. Res Policy 32(8):1293–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Siegel D, Thursby J, Thursby M, Ziedonis A (2001) Organizational issues in university-industry technology transfer: an overview of the symposium issue. J Technol Transf 26:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Siegel D, Waldman D, Atwater L, Link AN (2003) Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. J High Technol Manage Res 14:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Slaughter S, Leslie LL (1997) Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial ­university. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  88. Slaughter S, Rhoades G (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  89. Souitaris V (1999) Research on the determinants of technological innovation. A contingency approach. Int J Innov Manage 3(3):287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP (2008) The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med 35(2):77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Suh NP (1986) The concept and goals of the engineering research centers in The New Engineering Research Centers: purposes, goals, and expectations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 37–43Google Scholar
  93. Tassey G (2005) Underinvestment in public good technologies. J Technol Transf 30(1/2):89–113Google Scholar
  94. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manage J 18(7):509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tierlinck P, Spithoven A (2010) Fostering industry-science cooperation through public funding: Differences between universities and public research centres. J Technol Transf 35:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tijssen RJW (2006) Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Res Policy 35:1569–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Toker U, Gray DO (2008) Innovation spaces: workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers. Res Policy 37:309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tornatzky LG, Hetzner WA, Eveland JD, Schwarzkopf A, Colton RM (1982) University-industry cooperative research centers: a practice manual. National Science Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  99. Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am Sociol Rev 61(4):674–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK, Vandeberg RLJ (2008) A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Res Policy 37:1255–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vonortas NS (1997) Cooperation in research and development. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  102. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ Sci 8(2):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Whyte WH, Nocera J (1956) The organization man. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  104. Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  105. Zajac EJ, Olsen CP (1993) From transaction cost to transactional value analysis—implications for the study of inter-organizational strategies. J Manage Stud 30(1):131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zajkowski ME (2003) Institutional structure and the Australian research director: a qualitative study. J High Educ 25(2):203–212Google Scholar
  107. Ziman J (1984) An introduction to science studies: the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ziman J (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.John Glenn School of Public Affairs, Battelle Center for Science and Technology PolicyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations