Abstract
The emerging technologies in protein engineering and the greater demand for next-generation protein therapeutics with enhanced efficacy, safety, reduced immunogenicity, and improved delivery are translating into increased nomination of more extensively engineered, difficult to develop candidates for development. Recent advances in protein structure, stability, and function relationship combined with advances in biophysics are enabling more comprehensive and accurate developability and manufacturability screening during early research stages. This chapter focuses on current and future challenges in developing therapeutic biological drugs and the application of novel biophysical tools to screen and improve potential developability properties. Based on stage-related requirements like predictability, speed, limited material, and resource availability, the suitability and application of various biophysical tools are discussed. Two case studies are provided to demonstrate the value of such an early risk assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman MJ, Clapham DE (1997) Ion channels–basic science and clinical disease. N Engl J Med 336(22):1575–1586
Adams CP, Brantner VV (2010) Spending on new drug development1. Health Econ 19(2):130–141
Anandakumar R, Harn NR, Sathish HA, LeachWL, Oliver CN, Bishop SM (2008) American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientist, National Biotech Conference, 2008
Anderson DR, Grillo-Lopez A, Varns C, Chambers KS, Hanna N (1997) Targeted anti-cancer therapy using rituximab, a chimaeric anti-CD20 antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma. Biochem Soc Trans 25(2):705–708
Bajaj H, Sharma VK, Kalonia DS (2007) A high-throughput method for detection of protein self-Âassociation and second virial coefficient using size-exclusion chromatography through simultaneous measurement of concentration and scattered light intensity. Pharm Res 24(11):2071–2083
Batista FD, Neuberger MS (1998) Affinity dependence of the B cell response to antigen: a threshold, a ceiling, and the importance of off-rate. Immunity 8(6):751–759
Bee JS, Stevenson JL, Mehta B, Svitel J, Pollastrini J, Platz R, Freund E, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW (2009) Response of a concentrated monoclonal antibody formulation to high shear. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(5):936–943
Bekard IB, Asimakis P, Bertolini J, Dunstan DE (2011) The effects of shear flow on protein structure and function. Biopolymers 95(11):733–745
Biddlecombe JG, Craig AV, Zhang H, Uddin S, Mulot S, Fish BC, Bracewell DG (2007) Determining antibody stability: creation of solid–liquid interfacial effects within a high shear environment. Biotechnol Prog 23(5):1218–1222
Boder ET, Midelfort KS, Wittrup KD (2000) Directed evolution of antibody fragments with monovalent femtomolar antigen-binding affinity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(20):10701–10705
Carter PJ (2011) Introduction to current and future protein therapeutics: a protein engineering perspective. Exp Cell Res 317(9):1261–1269
Cellmer T, Bratko D, Prausnitz JM, Blanch HW (2007) Protein aggregation in silico. Trends Biotechnol 25(6):254–261
Chan AC, Carter PJ (2010) Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 10(5):301–316
Chari R, Jerath K, Badkar AV, Kalonia DS (2009) Long- and short-range electrostatic interactions affect the rheology of highly concentrated antibody solutions. Pharm Res 26(12):2607–2618
Chennamsetty N, Voynov V, Kayser V, Helk B, Trout BL (2009a) Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(29):11937–11942
Chennamsetty N, Helk B, Voynov V, Kayser V, Trout BL (2009b) Aggregation-prone motifs in human immunoglobulin G. J Mol Biol 391(2):404–413
Chi EY, Krishnan S, Randolph TW, Carpenter JF (2003a) Physical stability of proteins in aqueous solution: mechanism and driving forces in nonnative protein aggregation. Pharm Res 20(9):1325–1336
Chi EY, Krishnan S, Kendrick BS, Chang BS, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW (2003b) Roles of Âconformational stability and colloidal stability in the aggregation of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Protein Sci 12(5):903–913
Dall’Acqua WF, Cook KE, Damschroder MM, Woods RM, Wu H (2006a) Modulation of the effector functions of a human IgG1 through engineering of its hinge region. J Immunol 177(2):1129–1138
Dall’Acqua WF, Kiener PA, Wu H (2006b) Properties of human IgG1s engineered for enhanced binding to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). J Biol Chem 281(33):23514–23524
DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG (2007) The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? Manag Decis Econ 28(4–5):469–479
Famm K, Hansen L, Christ D, Winter G (2008) Thermodynamically stable aggregation-resistant antibody domains through directed evolution. J Mol Biol 376(4):926–931
Finch DK, Sleeman MA, Moisan J, Ferraro F, Botterell S, Campbell J, Cochrane D, Cruwys S, England E, Lane S, Rendall E, Sinha M, Walker C, Rees G, Bowen MA, Schneider A, Liang M, Faggioni R, Fung M, Mallinder PR, Wilkinson T, Kolbeck R, Vaughan T, Lowe DC (2011) Whole-molecule antibody engineering: generation of a high-affinity anti-IL-6 antibody with extended pharmacokinetics. J Mol Biol 411(4):791–807
Foote J, Eisen HN (1995) Kinetic and affinity limits on antibodies produced during immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(5):1254–1256
Fowler SB, Poon S, Muff R, Chiti F, Dobson CM, Zurdo J (2005) Rational design of aggregation-Âresistant bioactive peptides: reengineering human calcitonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(29):10105–10110
Gebauer M, Skerra A (2009) Engineered protein scaffolds as next-generation antibody therapeutics. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(3):245–255
George A, Wilson WW (1994) Predicting protein crystallization from a dilute solution property. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 50(Pt 4):361–365
Goldberg DS, Bishop SM, Shah AU, Sathish HA (2010) Formulation development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using high-throughput fluorescence and static light scattering techniques: role of conformational and colloidal stability. J Pharm Sci
Hageman MJ (2006) Solubility, solubilization and dissolution in drug delivery during lead optimization. Springer, New York
He F, Becker GW, Litowski JR, Narhi LO, Brems DN, Razinkov VI (2009) High-throughput dynamic light scattering method for measuring viscosity of concentrated protein solutions. Anal Biochem 399(1):141–143
Igawa T, Tsunoda H, Kuramochi T, Sampei Z, Ishii S, Hattori K (2011) Engineering the variable region of therapeutic IgG antibodies. MAbs 3(3):243–252
Jespers L, Schon O, Famm K, Winter G (2004) Aggregation-resistant domain antibodies selected on phage by heat denaturation. Nat Biotechnol 22(9):1161–1165
Johnson DH, Parupudi A, Wilson WW, DeLucas LJ (2009) High-throughput self-interaction chromatography: applications in protein formulation prediction. Pharm Res 26(2):296–305
Karlsson M, Ekeroth J, Elwing H, Carlsson U (2005) Reduction of irreversible protein adsorption on solid surfaces by protein engineering for increased stability. J Biol Chem 280(27):25558–25564
Kayser V, Chennamsetty N, Voynov V, Forrer K, Helk B, Trout BL (2011) Glycosylation influences on the aggregation propensity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnol J 6(1):38–44
Kola I, Landis J (2004) Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(8):711–715
Krapp S, Mimura Y, Jefferis R, Huber R, Sondermann P (2003) Structural analysis of human IgG-Fc glycoforms reveals a correlation between glycosylation and structural integrity. J Mol Biol 325(5):979–989
Kubota T, Niwa R, Satoh M, Akinaga S, Shitara K, Hanai N (2009) Engineered therapeutic antibodies with improved effector functions. Cancer Sci 100(9):1566–1572
Lauer TM, Agrawal NJ, Chennamsetty N, Egodage K, Helk B, Trout BL (2012) Developability index: a rapid in silico tool for the screening of antibody aggregation propensity. J Pharm Sci 101(1):102–115
Le Brun V, Friess W, Bassarab S, Muhlau S, Garidel P (2010) A critical evaluation of Âself-Âinteraction chromatography as a predictive tool for the assessment of protein-protein interactions in protein formulation development: a case study of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 75(1):16–25
Liu J, Nguyen MD, Andya JD, Shire SJ (2005) Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. J Pharm Sci 94(9):1928–1940
Lundstrom K (2005) Structural genomics of GPCRs. Trends Biotechnol 23(2):103–108
Ma P, Zemmel R (2002) Value of novelty? Nat Rev Drug Discov 1(8):571–572
Mehta CM, White ET, Litster JD (2012) Correlation of second virial coefficient with solubility for proteins in salt solutions. Biotechnol Prog 28(1):163–170
Mimura Y, Church S, Ghirlando R, Ashton PR, Dong S, Goodall M, Lund J, Jefferis R (2000) The influence of glycosylation on the thermal stability and effector function expression of human IgG1-Fc: properties of a series of truncated glycoforms. Mol Immunol 37(12–13):697–706
Minton AP (2005) Influence of macromolecular crowding upon the stability and state of association of proteins: predictions and observations. J Pharm Sci 94(8):1668–1675
Naylor J, Beech DJ (2009) Extracellular ion channel inhibitor antibodies. Open Drug Discov J 1:36–42
Nelson AL, Dhimolea E, Reichert JM (2010) Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9(10):767–774
Norde W (1986) Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid–liquid interface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 25(4):267–340
Oganesyan V, Damschroder MM, Leach W, Wu H, Dall’Acqua WF (2008) Structural characterization of a mutated, ADCC-enhanced human Fc fragment. Mol Immunol 45(7):1872–1882
Payne RW, Nayar R, Tarantino R, Del Terzo S, Moschera J, Di J, Heilman D, Bray B, Manning MC, Henry CS (2006) Second virial coefficient determination of a therapeutic peptide by self-Âinteraction chromatography. Biopolymers 84(5):527–533
Pepinsky RB, Silvian L, Berkowitz SA, Farrington G, Lugovskoy A, Walus L, Eldredge J, Capili A, Mi S, Graff C, Garber E (2010) Improving the solubility of anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody Li33 by isotype switching and targeted mutagenesis. Protein Sci 19(5):954–966
Prassler J, Thiel S, Pracht C, Polzer A, Peters S, Bauer M, Norenberg S, Stark Y, Kolln J, Popp A, Urlinger S, Enzelberger M (2011) HuCAL PLATINUM, a synthetic Fab library optimized for sequence diversity and superior performance in mammalian expression systems. J Mol Biol 413(1):261–278
Presta LG (2008) Molecular engineering and design of therapeutic antibodies. Curr Opin Immunol 20(4):460–470
Remmele RL Jr, Nightlinger NS, Srinivasan S, Gombotz WR (1998) Interleukin-1 receptor (IL-Â1R) liquid formulation development using differential scanning calorimetry. Pharm Res 15(2):200–208
Salinas BA, Sathish HA, Bishop SM, Harn N, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW (2010) Understanding and modulating opalescence and viscosity in a monoclonal antibody formulation. J Pharm Sci 99(1):82–93
Saluja A, Kalonia DS (2008) Nature and consequences of protein-protein interactions in high protein concentration solutions. Int J Pharm 358(1–2):1–15
Scherer TM, Liu J, Shire SJ, Minton AP (2010) Intermolecular interactions of IgG1 monoclonal antibodies at high concentrations characterized by light scattering. J Phys Chem B 114(40):12948–12957
Sethuraman A, Belfort G (2005) Protein structural perturbation and aggregation on homogeneous surfaces. Biophys J 88(2):1322–1333
Sinha S, Zhang L, Duan S, Williams TD, Vlasak J, Ionescu R, Topp EM (2009) Effect of protein structure on deamidation rate in the Fc fragment of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody. Protein Sci 18(8):1573–1584
Stewart R, Thom G, Levens M, Guler-Gane G, Holgate R, Rudd PM, Webster C, Jermutus L, Lund J (2011) A variant human IgG1-Fc mediates improved ADCC. Protein Eng Des Sel 24(9):671–678
Sule SV, Sukumar M, Weiss WF, Marcelino-Cruz AM, Sample T, Tessier PM (2011) High-Âthroughput analysis of concentration-dependent antibody self-association. Biophys J 101(7):1749–1757
Tadros T (2011) Interparticle interactions in concentrated suspensions and their bulk (rheological) properties. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 168(1–2):263–277
Tessier PM, Jinkoji J, Cheng YC, Prentice JL, Lenhoff AM (2008) Self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy: a nanoparticle-based protein interaction assay. J Am Chem Soc 130(10): 3106–3112
Thomas CR, Geer D (2011) Effects of shear on proteins in solution. Biotechnol Lett 33(3):443–456
Valente JJ, Payne RW, Manning MC, Wilson WW, Henry CS (2005) Colloidal behavior of Âproteins: effects of the second virial coefficient on solubility, crystallization and aggregation of proteins in aqueous solution. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 6(6):427–436
Vlasak J, Ionescu R (2011) Fragmentation of monoclonal antibodies. MAbs 3(3):253–263
Wendorf JR, Radke CJ, Blanch HW (2004) Reduced protein adsorption at solid interfaces by sugar excipients. Biotechnol Bioeng 87(5):565–573
Weng WK, Levy R (2003) Two immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms independently predict response to rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 21(21):3940–3947
Yadav S, Scherer TM, Shire SJ, Kalonia DS (2011) Use of dynamic light scattering to determine second virial coefficient in a semidilute concentration regime. Anal Biochem 411(2):292–296
Yadav S, Shire SJ, Kalonia DS (2012) Viscosity behavior of high-concentration monoclonal antibody solutions: correlation with interaction parameter and electroviscous effects. J Pharm Sci 101(3):998–1011
Acknowledgements 
Authors wish to thank Nancy Craighead at MedImmune for critical review of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sathish, H., Angell, N., Lowe, D., Shah, A., Bishop, S. (2013). Application of Biophysics to the Early Developability Assessment of Therapeutic Candidates and Its Application to Enhance Developability Properties. In: Narhi, L. (eds) Biophysics for Therapeutic Protein Development. Biophysics for the Life Sciences, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4316-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4316-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4315-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4316-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)