Viscoelastic Creep Compliance Using Prony Series and Spectrum Function Approach

  • Jutima Simsiriwong
  • Rani W. Sullivan
  • Harry H. Hilton
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the viscoelastic material property of a vinyl ester (VE) resin using (1) the generalized 3-D viscoelastic constitutive equation with a Prony series representation and (2) a spectrum function model. The Prony series representation of the Generalized Kelvin model (GKM) is used to determine the Prony series coefficients through the linear least squares (LSQ) method. The Elastic-Viscoelastic Correspondence Principle (EVCP) and the Laplace transform are used in the spectrum function approach, which utilizes a carefully selected distribution function that has the potential to describe a wide range of materials. Short-term unidirectional tensile creep experiments are conducted at two stress levels and at four temperatures below the glass transition temperature of the VE polymer. Experimental strains in both the longitudinal and transverse directions and the applied stress are measured using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique. The measured data is subsequently used to determine the creep compliance function for each test configuration. The potential and limitations of each modeling approach are discussed.

Keywords

Viscoelasticity Constitutive viscoelastic relations Spectrum function Material property characterizations Creep 

References

  1. 1.
    Beldica, CE, Hilton, HH (1999) Analytical and computational simulations of experimental determinations of deterministic and random linear viscoelastic constitutive relations. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Composite MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michaeli M, Shtark A, Grosbein H, Steevens AJ, Hilton HH (2011) Analytical, experimental and computational viscoelastic material characterizations absent Poisson’s ratios. In: Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 23–26 Apr 2007Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shtark A, Grosbein H, Sameach G, Hilton HH (2007) An alternate protocol for determining viscoelastic material properties based on tensile tests without use of Poisson ratios. In: Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and ExpositionGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sullivan RW (2006) On the use of a spectrum-based model for linear viscoelastic materials. Mech Time-Depend Mater 10(3):215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sullivan RW (2010) Using a spectrum function approach to model flexure creep in viscoelastic composite beams. Mech Time-Depend Mater 19(1–3):39–47Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sullivan RW (2008) Development of a viscoelastic continuum damage model for cyclic loading. Mech Time-Depend Mater 12(4):329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sullivan RW (2003) An analytical method to determine the mechanical properties of linear viscoelastic solids. Mississippi State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prony R, Prony R (1795) Essai experimental et analytique. J Ec Polytech (Paris) 2:24–76Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schapery RA (1961) A simple collocation method for fitting viscoelastic models to experimental data. Rep. GALCIT SM 61-23AGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schapery RA (1967) Stress analysis of viscoelastic composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 1:228–267Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradshaw R, Brinson L (1997) A sign control method for fitting and interconverting material functions for linearly viscoelastic solids. Mech Time-Depend Mater 1(1):85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cost TL, Becker B (1970) Multidata method of approximate Laplace transform inversion. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2(2):207–219MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park S, Kim Y (2001) Fitting Prony-series viscoelastic models with power-law presmoothing. J Mater Civil Eng 1(3):26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Betten J (2008) Creep mechanics. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen RM (1982) Theory of viscoelasticity: an introduction. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eringen AC (1980) Mechanics of continua, vol 1. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Huntington, p 606Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sullivan RW, Razzaghi M, Simsiriwong J (2011) Numerical iterative method for Volterra equations of the convolution type. Math Method Appl Sci 34(2):140–146MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lakes RS (1999) Viscoelastic solids. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park S, Kim Y (1999) Interconversion between relaxation modulus and creep compliance for viscoelastic solids. J Mater Civil Eng 1(1):76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goodman SH (1998) Handbook of thermoset plastics. William Andrew, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM Standard D 638M-89 (1998) Standard test methods for tensile properties of plastics, Vol 08.01. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hilton HH (2011) Clarifications of certain ambiguities and failings of Poisson’s ratios in linear viscoelasticity. J Elast. 104(1–2):303–318Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nouranian S (2011) Vapor-grown carbon nanofiber/vinyl ester nanocomposites: designed experimental study of mechanical properties and molecular dynamics simulations. Mississippi State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM Standard D 2990-77 (1998) Standard test methods for tensile, compressive, and flexural creep and creep-rupture of plastics, Vol 08.01. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jutima Simsiriwong
    • 1
  • Rani W. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Harry H. Hilton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringStarkvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Private Sector Program Division, National Center for Supercomputing ApplicationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations