Advertisement

Multimedia Signals and Systems in Telemedicine

Chapter

Abstract

Nowadays, telemedicine has been considered as a new and perspective research area which uses the advantages of multimedia systems to provide efficient medical services at the distance. The future hospitals should provide healthcare services to patients all over the world using multimedia systems in the frame of telemedicine technologies. Signal and image acquisition, signal and image storage, signal and image display and processing are the major components of telemedicine. Aiming to promote the advantages of telemedicine to the multimedia signal processing community, this chapter reviews different aspects of medical practice such as telenursing, teleradiology, telesurgery, and telepharmacy.

References

  1. 1.
    Anvari M (2007) Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg 31(8):1545–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnaert A, Delesie L (2001) Telenursing for the elderly. The case for care via video-telephony. J Telemed Telecare 7(6):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barneveld Binkhuysena FH, Ranschaert ER (2011) Teleradiology: evolution and concepts. Eur J Radiol 78(2):205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunetti ND, Amodio G, De Gennaro L, Dellegrottaglie G, Pellegrino PL, Di Biase M, Antonelli G (2009) Telecardiology applied to a region-wide public emergency health-care service. J Thromb Thrombolysis 28(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bynum A, Hopkins D, Thomas A, Copeland N, Irwin C (2001) The effect of telepharmacy counseling on metered-dose inhaler technique among adolescents with asthma in rural Arkansas. Telemed J e-Health 7(3):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan WM, Hjelm NM (2001) The role of telenursing in the provision of geriatric outreach services to residential homes in Hong Kong. J Telemed Telecare 7(1):38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friesner DL, Scott DM, Rathke AM, Peterson CD, Anderson HC (2011) Do remote community telepharmacies have higher medication error rates than traditional community pharmacies? Evidence from the North Dakota telepharmacy project. J Am Pharm Assoc 51(5):580–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garrelts JC, Gagnon M, Eisenberg C, Moerer J, Carrithers J (2010) Impact of telepharmacy in a multihospital health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 67(17):1456–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giansanti D, Morelli S, Maccioni G, Costantini G (2009) Toward the design of a wearable system for fall-risk detection in telerehabilitation. Telemed e-Health 15(3):296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagan L, Morin D, Lepine R (2000) Evaluation of telenursing outcomes: satisfaction, self-care practices, and cost savings. Public Health Nurs 17(4):305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermann VH, Herzog M, Jordan R, Hofherr K, Levine P, Page SJ (2010) Telerehabilitation and electrical stimulation: an occupation-based, client-centered stroke intervention. Am J Occup Ther 64(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jerant AF, Azari R, Martinez C, Nesbitt TS (2003) A randomized trial of telenursing to reduce hospitalization for heart failure: patient-centered outcomes and nursing indicators. Home Health Care Serv Q 22(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jönsson AM, Willman A (2009) Telenursing in home care services: experiences of registered nurses. Electron J Health Inform 4(1):e9–1–7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M (2009) A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 31(6):427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz ME (2010) Pediatric teleradiology: the benefits. Pediatr Radiol 40(8):1345–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lai JCK, Woo J, Hui E, Chan WM (2004) Telerehabilitation – a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare 10(4):199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lam AY, Rose D (2009) Telepharmacy services in an urban community health clinic system. J Am Pharm Assoc 49(5):652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD, Goyal M (2011) A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res 2:e31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nikus K, Lähteenmäkib J, Lehto P, Eskola M (2009) The role of continuous monitoring in a 24/7 telecardiology consultation service – a feasibility study. J Electrocardiol 42(6):473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pappasa Y, Sealeb C (2010) The physical examination in telecardiology and televascular consultations: a study using conversation analysis. Patient Educ Couns 81(1):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peterson CD, Anderson HC (2004) The North Dakota telepharmacy project: restoring and retaining pharmacy services in rural communities. J Pharm Technol 20(1):28–39Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wakefield DS, Ward MM, Loes JL, O’Brien J, Sperry L (2010) Implementation of a telepharmacy service to provide round-the-clock medication order review by pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 67(23):2052–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ward E, Crombie J, Trickey M, Hill A, Theodoros D, Russell T (2009) Assessment of communication and swallowing post-laryngectomy: a telerehabilitation trial. J Telemed Telecare 15(5):232–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitten P, Mair F, Collins B (2001) Home telenursing in Kansas: patients’ perceptions of uses and benefits. J Telemed Telecare 3(1):67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winters JM (2002) Telerehabilitation research: emerging opportunities. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4:287–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srdjan Stanković
    • 1
  • Irena Orović
    • 1
  • Ervin Sejdić
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations