Multiscale Signal Processing with Discrete Hermite Functions

  • Dale H. MuglerEmail author
  • Anandi Mahadevan


Discrete Hermite functions (DHf) provide a new way of analyzing digital signals. As opposed to cumbersome computational methods that can only construct orthogonal discrete Hermite functions effectively for a small number of indices, there is a new method of computing DHf that is fast and efficient. Signal processing techniques that have been applied using the continuous Hermite functions (CHf) can now be adapted to the digital case, using this orthonormal set of DHf that share many of the properties of the continuous CHf. For some time, a multiscale version of the CHf has been available for analysis and has been applied to different kinds of signals and shown to be related to receptive fields of neurons. In this chapter, we explore the application of the digital DHf in multiscale analysis, showing analogies to the multiscale analysis provided by the CHf.


Input Signal Wavelet Decomposition Hermite Polynomial Discrete Case Multiscale Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Burt PJ, Adelson EH (1983) The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans Commun 31:532–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clary S, Mugler DH (2003) Shifted Fourier matrices and their tridiagonal commutors. SIAM J Matrix Anal 24(3):809–821MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clary S, Mugler DH (2004) Eigenvectors for a class of discrete cosine and sine transforms. Sampling Theor Signal Image Process 3:83–94MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Escalante-Ramrez B, Martens JB (1992) Noise reduction in computerized tomography images by means of polynomial transforms. J Visual Commun Image Rep 3:272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gopalikrishnan R, Acharya S, Mugler DH (2004) Real time monitoring of ischemic changes in electrocardiograms using discrete Hermite functions. In: Proceedings of 26th International IEEE EMBS Conference, San Francisco, IEEE, pp 438–441Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gopalikrishnan R, Mugler DH (2010) The evolution of Hermite transform in biomedical applications. In: Shukla A, Tiwari R (eds.) Intelligent medical technologies and biomedical engineering: tools and applications. IGI Global, San Francisco, IEEE, pp 260–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahadevan A, Acharya S, Sheffer D, Mugler DH (2008) Ballistocardiogram artifact removal in EEG-fMRI signals using discrete Hermite transforms. IEEE J Selected Topics Signal Process (Special Issue on: fMRI analysis for human brain mapping) 2(6):839–853Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martens JB (1990) The Hermite transform-theory. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 38(9):1595–1606zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martens JB (1990) The Hermite transform-applications. IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech Signal Process 38(9):1607–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mugler DH, Clary S (2000) Discrete Hermite functions. In: Proceedings of the International conference on scientific computing and mathematical modeling, IMACS 2000, pp 318–321Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mugler DH, Clary S (2001) Discrete Hermite functions and the fractional Fourier transform. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sampling Theory, pp 303–308Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mugler DH, Clary S, Wu Y (2002) Discrete Hermite expansion of digital signals: applications to ecg signals. In: Proceedings of IEEE Signal Processing Society. 10th DSP Workshop. Georgia, pp 271–276Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poularikas AD (1999) The handbook of formulas and tables for signal processing. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Refregier A (2003) Shapelets I. A method for image analysis. Mon Not R Astron Soc 338: 35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodieck RW (1965) Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Res 5:583–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silván-Cárdenas JL, Escalante-Ramrez B (2006) The multiscale hermite transform for local orientation analysis. IEEE Trans Im Proc 15:1236–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Rullen R, Thorpe SJ (2001) Rate coding versus temporal order coding: what the retinal ganglion cells tell the visual cortex. Neural Comput 13:1255–1283zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Witkin A (1984) Scale-space filtering: A new approach to multiscale description. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol 9. San Diego, CA, pp 150–153Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AkronAkronUSA
  2. 2.Philips Home Healthcare SolutionsMurraysvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations