Abstract
It has been known for a century that damage to an area within the fusiform gyrus of the right occipito-temporal cortex results in a peculiar syndrome—prosopagnosia. The patient, otherwise normal, cannot recognize familiar faces. This area was labeled Fusiform Face Area (FFA). Modern brain imaging studies confirmed FFA’s function: all people in the normal population activate the FFA during face recognition tests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This theory is psychological; it is not directly related (congruent) to brain functional differentiation with its three dimensions.
- 2.
Occasional feelings of false familiarity with unknown faces are not uncommon in normal people, though they are usually faint and are rapidly acknowledged as a trivial error (Young, Hay, & Ellis, 1985).
- 3.
If the left hemisphere has a compulsive desire to rationalize, the right hemisphere has a compulsive need to identify.
- 4.
To say a prosopagnostic person can understand emotional expression from a face is not fully correct. He is able to understand the conventional part of emotion. The uniqueness of Mr. N’s smile is made up of more than just fixed-in-evolution, “conventional” facial movements. Such movements belong to the sensory-motor and gnostic–praxic level. The thalamic level also contributes background movements for emotion, reflecting one’s internal state and idiosyncratic RH experience. These thalamic emotional expressions will be discussed in Chaps. 7 and 8.
- 5.
I used the term superior temporal gyrus (STG) in Chap. 3, not superior temporal sulcus (STS). In the literature, both terms are used interchangeably, referring to the similar functions. It seems that STS is more specific to moving eyes and mouth.
- 6.
Using brain imaging split from the tradition of various schools of psychiatry and neuropsychology leads to such a conclusion where perceptual visual deficit or genes of “not looking at eyes” are the etiological determinants of a mental disorder.
- 7.
To determine those areas of the face that were in fact relied upon by the subjects in this study, the authors used the “Bubbles” technique, analyzing then the areas of the face that were revealed as a function of participants’ accuracy.
- 8.
This finding is very interesting by itself. Normal fixation on the left eye, i.e., the left visual field, indicates better use of facial information by the right hemisphere than by the left in autistic participants.
- 9.
In this chapter, I did not analyze the amygdala’s functioning in the autistic brain’s face processing network.
References
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Belger, A., Puce, A., Luby, M., Spencer, D. D., & Bentin, S. (1994). What is a face? Electrophysiological responsiveness of human extrastriate visual cortex to human faces, face components, and animals faces. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 20, 316.
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual clues: role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 267–278.
Bar-Haim, Y., Shulman, C., Lamy, D., & Reuveni, A. (2006). Attention to eyes and mouth in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 131–137.
Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H. A., Bullmore, E. T., Wheelwright, S., Ashwin, C., & Williams, S. C. R. (2000). The amygdala theory of autism. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 24, 355–364.
Barton, J., Cherkasova, M., Hefter, R., Cox, T., O’Connor, M., & Dara Manoach, D. (2004). Are patients with social developmental disorders prosopagnostic? Perceptual heterogeneity in the Asperger and socio-emotional processing disorders. Brain, 127, 1706–1716.
Barton, J., Cherkassova, M., Press, D., Intriligator, J., & O’Connor, M. (2003). Developmental prosopagnosia: a study of three patients. Brain and Cognition, 51, 12–30.
Barton, J., Press, D., Keenan, J., & O’Connor, M. (2002). Lesions of fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 58, 71–78.
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565.
Benton, A., & Tranel, D. (1993). Impairment in facial recognition. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 176–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
Boucher, J., Lewis, V., & Collis, G. (1998). Familiar face and voice matching and recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 171–181.
Campbell, R., Landis, T., & Regard, M. (1986). Face recognition and lip-reading: a neurological dissociation. Brain, 109, 509–521.
Dalton, K. M., Nacewicz, B. M., Johnstone, T., Schaefer, H. S., Gernsbacher, M. A., Golsmith, H. H., Alexander, A. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2005). Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 519–526.
Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory. Annual Review of Neurocsience, 13, 89–109.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.
Ekman, P. (1982). Emotion in the human face. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, H. D., & Young, A. W. (1988). Training in face-processing skills for a child with acquired prosopagnosia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 283–294.
Frith, U. (1996). Cognitive explanation of autism. Acta Paediatrica Supplement, 416, 63–68.
Grandin, T. (1995). Thinking in pictures. New York: Vintage Books. A division of Random House.
Hasselmo, M. E., Rolls, E. T., Baylis, G. C., & Nalwa, V. (1989). Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 75, 417–429.
Joseph, R. M., & Tanaka, J. (2003). Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 529–542.
Klin, A., Jones, B. A., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Defining and quantifying the social phenotype in autism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 895–908.
Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson, N. J., Reznick, J. S., Paul, G., Goldman, B. D., & Piven, J. (2002). Visual scanning of faces in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 249–261.
Pelphrey, K., Singerman, J. D., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (2003). Brain activation evoked perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context. Neuropsychologia, 41, 156–170.
Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Phylosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences, 335, 23–30.
Philips, M. L. (2004). Facial processing deficits and social dysfunction: how are they related? Brain, 127, 1691–1692.
Pierce, K., Haist, F., Sedaghat, F., & Courchesne, E. (2004). The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond. Brain, 127, 2703–2716.
Pierce, K., Muller, R.-A., Ambrose, J., Allen, G., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Face processing occurs outside the fusiform ‘face area’ in autism: evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 124, 2059–2073.
Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J., & Gregory McCarthy, G. (1998). Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2188–2199.
Schultz, R. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23, 125–141.
Schultz, R., Gauhier, I., Klin, A., Fullbright, R., Anderson, A., Volkmar, F., Skudlarski, P., Lacadic, C., Cohen, D., & Gore, J. (2000). Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 331–340.
Spezio, M. L., Adolphs, R., Hurley, R. S. E., & Piven, J. (2007). Abnormal use of facial information in high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 929–939.
Teunisse & De Gelder. (1994). Do autists have a generalized face processing deficit? International Journal of Neuroscience, 77, 1–10.
Tranel, D., Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1988). Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired face identity. Neurology, 38, 690–696.
Van der Geest, J. N., Kemner, C., Camfferman, G., Verbated, M. N., & van Engeland, H. (2002). Looking at images with human figures: comparison between autistic and normal children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 69–75.
Vuilleumier, P., Mohr, C., Valenza, N., Wetzel, C., & Landis, T. (2003). Hyperfamiliarity for unknown faces after left lateral temporo-occipital venous infarction: a double dissociation with prosopagnosia. Brain, 126, 889–907.
Yamane, S., Kaji, S., & Kawano, K. (1988). What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey? Experimental Brain Research, 73, 209–214.
Young, A. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1989). Childhood prosopagnosia. Brain and Cognition, 9, 16–47.
Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). The faces that launched a thousand slips: everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 495–523.
Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., de Haan, E. H. F., Small, M., & Hay, D. C. (1993). Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain, 116, 941–959.
Zeki, S., & Lamb, M. (1994). The neurology of kinetic art. Brain, 117, 607–636.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glezerman, T.B. (2013). How Autistic Persons Perceive Faces (Cerebral Organization of Face Recognition and Autism). In: Autism and the Brain. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4112-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4112-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4111-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4112-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)