Abstract
The C. elegans germ line has emerged as an important model for understanding how a stem cell population is maintained throughout the life of the animal while still producing the gametes necessary for propagation of the species. The stem cell population in the adult hermaphrodite is relatively large, with stem cells giving rise to daughters that appear intrinsically equivalent; however, some of the daughters retain the proliferative fate while others enter meiotic prophase. While machinery exists for cells to progress through the mitotic cell cycle and machinery exists for cells to progress through meiotic prophase, central to understanding germ line development is identifying the genes and regulatory processes that determine whether the mitotic cell cycle or meiotic prophase machinery will be utilized; in other words, the genes that regulate the switch of germ cells from the proliferative stem cell fate to the meiotic development fate. Whether a germ cell self-renews or enters meiotic prophase is largely determined by its proximity to the distal tip cell (DTC), which is the somatic niche cell that caps the distal end of the gonad. Germ cells close to the DTC have high levels of GLP-1 Notch signaling, which promotes the proliferative fate, while cells further from the DTC have high activity levels of the GLD-1 and GLD-2 redundant RNA regulatory pathways, as well as a third uncharacterized pathway, each of which direct cells to enter meiotic prophase. Other factors and pathways modulate this core genetic pathway, or work in parallel to it, presumably to ensure that a tight balance is maintained between proliferation and meiotic entry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U (2011) Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development 138(17):3593–3612. doi:10.1242/dev.063610
Austin J, Kimble J (1987) glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 51(4):589–599
Austin J, Kimble J (1989) Transcript analysis of glp-1 and lin-12, homologous genes required for cell interactions during development of C. elegans. Cell 58(3):565–571
Bailly A, Gartner A (2012) Germ cell apoptosis and DNA damage responses. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:249–276. (Chap. 9, this volume) Springer, New York
Baltus AE, Menke DB, Hu YC, Goodheart ML, Carpenter AE, de Rooij DG, Page DC (2006) In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication. Nat Genet 38(12):1430–1434. doi:10.1038/ng1919
Belfiore M, Pugnale P, Saudan Z, Puoti A (2004) Roles of the C. elegans cyclophilin-like protein MOG-6 in MEP-1 binding and germline fates. Development 131(12):2935–2945
Berry LW, Westlund B, Schedl T (1997) Germ-line tumor formation caused by activation of glp-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans member of the Notch family of receptors. Development 124:925
Bessler JB, Reddy KC, Hayashi M, Hodgkin J, Villeneuve AM (2007) A role for Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 in the proliferation vs. meiotic entry decision. Genetics 175(4):2029–2037. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.070987
Bianco P (2011) Minireview: the stem cell next door: skeletal and hematopoietic stem cell “niches” in bone. Endocrinology 152(8):2957–2962. doi:10.1210/en.2011-0217
Biedermann B, Wright J, Senften M, Kalchhauser I, Sarathy G, Lee MH, Ciosk R (2009) Translational repression of cyclin E prevents precocious mitosis and embryonic gene activation during C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 17(3):355–364. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.08.003
Brawley C, Matunis E (2004) Regeneration of male germline stem cells by spermatogonial dedifferentiation in vivo. Science 304(5675):1331–1334
Brodigan TM, Liu J, Park M, Kipreos ET, Krause M (2003) Cyclin E expression during development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 254(1):102–115
Buck SH, Chiu D, Saito RM (2009) The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, cki-1 and cki-2, act in overlapping but distinct pathways to control cell cycle quiescence during C. elegans development. Cell Cycle 8(16):2613–2620
Christensen S, Kodoyianni V, Bosenberg M, Friedman L, Kimble J (1996) lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development 122(5):1373–1383
Cinquin O, Crittenden SL, Morgan DE, Kimble J (2010) Progression from a stem cell-like state to early differentiation in the C. elegans germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(5):2048–2053. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912704107
Ciosk R, DePalma M, Priess JR (2004) ATX-2, the C. elegans ortholog of ataxin 2, functions in translational regulation in the germline. Development 131(19):4831–4841
Ciosk R, DePalma M, Priess JR (2006) Translational regulators maintain totipotency in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Science 311(5762):851–853
Crittenden SL, Troemel ER, Evans TC, Kimble J (1994) GLP-1 is localized to the mitotic region of the C. elegans germ line. Development 120:2901
Crittenden SL, Bernstein DS, Bachorik JL, Thompson BE, Gallegos M (2002) A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 417:660
Crittenden SL, Eckmann CR, Wang L, Bernstein DS, Wickens M, Kimble J (2003) Regulation of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1436):1359–1362
Crittenden SL, Leonhard KA, Byrd DT, Kimble J (2006) Cellular analyses of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabditis elegans adult germ line. Mol Biol Cell 17(7):3051–3061
Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, Villeneuve AM (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94(3):387–398
Dorsett M, Westlund B, Schedl T (2009) METT-10, a putative methyltransferase, inhibits germ cell proliferative fate in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 183(1):233–247. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.105270
Doyle TG, Wen C, Greenwald I (2000) SEL-8, a nuclear protein required for LIN-12 and GLP-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(14):7877–7881
Eckmann CR, Kraemer B, Wickens M, Kimble J (2002) GLD-3, a bicaudal-C homolog that inhibits FBF to control germline sex determination in C. elegans. Dev Cell 3(5):697–710
Eckmann C, Crittenden SL, Suh N, Kimble J (2004) GLD-3 and control of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 168:147
Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I (1995) Interchangeability of Caenorhabditis elegans DSL proteins and intrinsic signalling activity of their extracellular domains in vivo. Development 121(12): 4275–4282
Fox PM, Vought VE, Hanazawa M, Lee MH, Maine E, Schedl T (2011) Cyclin E and CDK-2 regulate proliferative cell fate and cell cycle progression in the C. elegans germline. Development 138:2223–2234. doi:10.1242/dev.059535
Francis R, Barton MK, Kimble J, Schedl T (1995a) gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139(2):579–606
Francis R, Maine E, Schedl T (1995b) Analysis of the multiple roles of gld-1 in germline development: interactions with the sex determination cascade and the glp-1 signaling pathway. Genetics 139(2):607–630
Fuchs E (2009) The tortoise and the hair: slow-cycling cells in the stem cell race. Cell 137(5):811–819. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.002
Fukuyama M, Rougvie AE, Rothman JH (2006) C. elegans DAF-18/PTEN mediates nutrient-dependent arrest of cell cycle and growth in the germline. Curr Biol 16(8):773–779. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.073
Hall DH, Winfrey VP, Blaeuer G, Hoffman LH, Furuta T, Rose KL, Hobert O, Greenstein D (1999) Ultrastructural features of the adult hermaphrodite gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans: relations between the germ line and soma. Dev Biol 212(1):101–123
Hansen D, Schedl T (2006) The regulatory network controlling the proliferation-meiotic entry decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Curr Top Dev Biol 76:185–215
Hansen D, Hubbard EJ, Schedl T (2004a) Multi-pathway control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Dev Biol 268(2):342–357
Hansen D, Wilson-Berry L, Dang T, Schedl T (2004b) Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation. Development 131(1):93–104. doi:10.1242/dev.00916
Henderson ST, Gao D, Lambie EJ, Kimble J (1994) lag-2 may encode a signaling ligand for the GLP-1 and LIN-12 receptors of C. elegans. Development 120(10):2913–2924
Honigberg SM, Purnapatre K (2003) Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 11):2137–2147. doi:10.1242/jcs.00460
Hubbard EJA (2007) Caenorhabditis elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology. Dev Dyn 236(12):3343–3357
Hubbard EJ, Korta DZ, Dalfó D (2012) Physiological control of germline development. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:101–131. (Chap. 5, this volume) Springer, New York
Jan E, Motzny CK, Graves LE, Goodwin EB (1999) The STAR protein, GLD-1, is a translational regulator of sexual identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J 18:258
Jaramillo-Lambert A, Ellefson M, Villeneuve AM, Engebrecht J (2007) Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line. Dev Biol 308(1):206–221. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.019
Jeong J, Verheyden JM, Kimble J (2011) Cyclin E and Cdk2 control GLD-1, the mitosis/meiosis decision, and germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1001348. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001348
Jin SW, Kimble J, Ellis RE (2001) Regulation of cell fate in Caenorhabditis elegans by a novel cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein. Dev Biol 229(2):537–553
Jones AR, Schedl T (1995) Mutations in gld-1, a female germ cell-specific tumor suppressor gene in Caenorhabditis elegans, affect a conserved domain also found in Src-associated protein Sam68. Genes Dev 9(12):1491–1504
Jones AR, Francis R, Schedl T (1996) GLD-1, a cytoplasmic protein essential for oocyte differentiation, shows stage- and sex-specific expression during Caenorhabditis elegans germline development. Dev Biol 180:165
Jungkamp AC, Stoeckius M, Mecenas D, Grun D, Mastrobuoni G, Kempa S, Rajewsky N (2011) In vivo and transcriptome-wide identification of RNA binding protein target sites. Mol Cell 44(5):828–840. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.009
Kadyk LC, Kimble J (1998) Genetic regulation of entry into meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125(10):1803–1813
Kai T, Spradling A (2004) Differentiating germ cells can revert into functional stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries. Nature 428(6982):564–569
Kalchhauser I, Farley BM, Pauli S, Ryder SP, Ciosk R (2011) FBF represses the Cip/Kip cell-cycle inhibitor CKI-2 to promote self-renewal of germline stem cells in C. elegans. EMBO J. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.263
Kerins JA, Hanazawa M, Dorsett M, Schedl T (2010) PRP-17 and the pre-mRNA splicing pathway are preferentially required for the proliferation versus meiotic development decision and germline sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Dyn 239(5):1555–1572. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22274
Kershner AM, Kimble J (2010) Genome-wide analysis of mRNA targets for Caenorhabditis elegans FBF, a conserved stem cell regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:1000495107 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1000495107
Killian DJ, Hubbard EJ (2004) C. elegans pro-1 activity is required for soma/germline interactions that influence proliferation and differentiation in the germ line. Development 131(6):1267–1278
Killian DJ, Hubbard EJ (2005) Caenorhabditis elegans germline patterning requires coordinated development of the somatic gonadal sheath and the germ line. Dev Biol 279(2):322–335
Kim S, Spike CA, Greenstein D (2012) Control of oocyte growth and meiotic maturation in C. elegans. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:277–320. (Chap. 10, this volume). Springer, New York
Kimble J, Crittenden SL (2007) Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23:405–433
Kimble JE, White JG (1981) On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 81(2):208–219
Kraemer B, Crittenden S, Gallegos M, Moulder G, Barstead R, Kimble J, Wickens M (1999) NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm-oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 9(18):1009–1018
Lai EC (2002) Protein degradation: four E3s for the notch pathway. Curr Biol 12(2):R74–R78
Lambie EJ, Kimble J (1991) Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. Development 112(1):231–240
Lamont LB, Crittenden SL, Bernstein D, Wickens M, Kimble J (2004) FBF-1 and FBF-2 regulate the size of the mitotic region in the C. elegans germline. Dev Cell 7(5):697–707
Lee MH, Schedl T (2001) Identification of in vivo mRNA targets of GLD-1, a maxi-KH motif containing protein required for C. elegans germ cell development. Genes Dev 15(18):2408–2420
Lee MH, Schedl T (2004) Translation repression by GLD-1 protects its mRNA targets from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in C. elegans. Genes Dev 18(9):1047–1059
Lee MH, Schedl T (2010) C. elegans star proteins, GLD-1 and ASD-2, regulate specific RNA targets to control development. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 693:106–122
Losick VP, Morris LX, Fox DT, Spradling A (2011) Drosophila stem cell niches: a decade of discovery suggests a unified view of stem cell regulation. Dev Cell 21(1):159–171. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.018
Lui DY, Colaiácovo MP (2012) Meiotic development in C. elegans. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:133–170. (Chap. 6, this volume) Springer, New York
Luitjens C, Gallegos M, Kraemer B, Kimble J, Wickens M (2000) CPEB proteins control two key steps in spermatogenesis in C. elegans. Genes Dev 14(20):2596–2609
MacDonald LD, Knox A, Hansen D (2008) Proteasomal regulation of the proliferation vs. meiotic entry decision in the C. elegans germ line. Genetics 180(2):905–920
Maciejowski J, Ugel N, Mishra B, Isopi M, Hubbard EJ (2006) Quantitative analysis of germline mitosis in adult C. elegans. Dev Biol 292(1):142–151
MacQueen AJ, Villeneuve AM (2001) Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev 15(13):1674–1687
Maine EM, Hansen D, Springer D, Vought VE (2004) Caenorhabditis elegans atx-2 promotes germline proliferation and the oocyte fate. Genetics 168(2):817–830
Maine EM, Hauth J, Ratliff T, Vought VE, She X, Kelly WG (2005) EGO-1, a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is required for heterochromatin assembly on unpaired dna during C. elegans meiosis. Curr Biol 15(21):1972–1978
Mantina P, Macdonald L, Kulaga A, Zhao L, Hansen D (2009) A mutation in teg-4, which encodes a protein homologous to the SAP130 pre-mRNA splicing factor, disrupts the balance between proliferation and differentiation in the C. elegans germ line. Mech Dev 126(5–6):417–429. doi:S0925-4773(09)00007-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.mod.2009.01.006
Marin VA, Evans TC (2003) Translational repression of a C. elegans Notch mRNA by the STAR/KH domain protein GLD-1. Development 130(12):2623–2632
McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T (1999) On the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 205(1):111–128
McGovern M, Voutev R, Maciejowski J, Corsi AK, Hubbard EJ (2009) A “latent niche” mechanism for tumor initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(28):11617–11622. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903768106
Merritt C, Seydoux G (2010) The Puf RNA-binding proteins FBF-1 and FBF-2 inhibit the expression of synaptonemal complex proteins in germline stem cells. Development 137(11):1787–1798. doi:10.1242/dev.050799
Mootz D, Ho DM, Hunter CP (2004) The STAR/Maxi-KH domain protein GLD-1 mediates a developmental switch in the translational control of C. elegans PAL-1. Development 131(14):3263–3272. doi:10.1242/dev.01196
Mumm JS, Kopan R (2000) Notch signaling: from the outside in. Dev Biol 228(2):151–165
Nadarajan S, Govindan JA, McGovern M, Hubbard EJ, Greenstein D (2009) MSP and GLP-1/Notch signaling coordinately regulate actomyosin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming and oocyte growth in C. elegans. Development 136(13):2223–2234. doi:10.1242/dev.034603
Narbonne P, Roy R (2006) Inhibition of germline proliferation during C. elegans dauer development requires PTEN, LKB1 and AMPK signalling. Development 133(4):611–619. doi:10.1242/dev.02232
Nousch M, Eckmann CR (2012) Translational control in the C. elegans germ line. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:205–247. (Chap. 8, this volume) Springer, New York
Pasierbek P, Jantsch M, Melcher M, Schleiffer A, Schweizer D, Loidl J (2001) A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev 15(11):1349–1360
Pepper AS, Lo TW, Killian DJ, Hall DH, Hubbard EJ (2003) The establishment of Caenorhabditis elegans germline pattern is controlled by overlapping proximal and distal somatic gonad signals. Dev Biol 259(2):336–350
Petcherski AG, Kimble J (2000) LAG-3 is a putative transcriptional activator in the C. elegans Notch pathway. Nature 405(6784):364–368
Puoti A, Kimble J (1999) The Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination gene mog-1 encodes a member of the DEAH-Box protein family. Mol Cell Biol 19(3):2189–2197
Puoti A, Kimble J (2000) The hermaphrodite sperm/oocyte switch requires the Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of PRP2 and PRP22. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(7):3276–3281
Qiao L, Lissemore JL, Shu P, Smardon A, Gelber MB, Maine EM (1995) Enhancers of glp-1, a gene required for cell-signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, define a set of genes required for germline development. Genetics 141(2):551–569
Reddy KC, Villeneuve AM (2004) C. elegans HIM-17 links chromatin modification and competence for initiation of meiotic recombination. Cell 118(4):439–452. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.026
Sanpei K, Takano H, Igarashi S, Sato T, Oyake M, Sasaki H, Wakisaka A, Tashiro K, Ishida Y, Ikeuchi T, Koide R, Saito M, Sato A, Tanaka T, Hanyu S, Takiyama Y, Nishizawa M, Shimizu N, Nomura Y, Segawa M, Iwabuchi K, Eguchi I, Tanaka H, Takahashi H, Tsuji S (1996) Identification of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 gene using a direct identification of repeat expansion and cloning technique, DIRECT. Nat Genet 14(3):277–284. doi:10.1038/ng1196-277
Seydoux G, Schedl T (2001) The germline in C. elegans: origins, proliferation, and silencing. Int Rev Cytol 203:139–185
Seydoux G, Schedl T, Greenwald I (1990) Cell-cell interactions prevent a potential inductive interaction between soma and germline in C. elegans. Cell 61(6):939–951
Sheng XR, Brawley CM, Matunis EL (2009) Dedifferentiating spermatogonia outcompete somatic stem cells for niche occupancy in the Drosophila testis. Cell Stem Cell 5(2):191–203. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.024
Smardon A, Spoerke JM, Stacey SC, Klein ME, Mackin N, Maine EM (2000) EGO-1 is related to RNA-directed RNA polymerase and functions in germ-line development and RNA interference in C. elegans. Curr Biol 10(4):169–178
Subramaniam K, Seydoux G (2003) Dedifferentiation of primary spermatocytes into germ cell tumors in C. elegans lacking the pumilio-like protein PUF-8. Curr Biol 13(2):134–139
Suh N, Jedamzik B, Eckmann CR, Wickens M, Kimble J (2006) The GLD-2 poly(A) polymerase activates gld-1 mRNA in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(41):15108–15112
Suh N, Crittenden SL, Goldstrohm A, Hook B, Thompson B, Wickens M, Kimble J (2009) FBF and its dual control of gld-1 expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 181(4):1249–1260. doi:10.1534/genetics.108.099440
Tax FE, Yeargers JJ, Thomas JH (1994) Sequence of C. elegans lag-2 reveals a cell-signalling domain shared with Delta and Serrate of Drosophila. Nature 368(6467):150–154
Thompson BE, Bernstein DS, Bachorik JL, Petcherski AG, Wickens M, Kimble J (2005) Dose-dependent control of proliferation and sperm specification by FOG-1/CPEB. Development 132(15):3471–3481
Tursun B, Patel T, Kratsios P, Hobert O (2011) Direct conversion of C. elegans germ cells into specific neuron types. Science 331(6015):304–308. doi:10.1126/science.1199082
Vought VE, Ohmachi M, Lee MH, Maine EM (2005) EGO-1, a putative RNA-directed RNA polymerase, promotes germline proliferation in parallel with GLP-1/notch signaling and regulates the spatial organization of nuclear pore complexes and germline P granules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 170(3):1121–1132. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.042135
Voutev R, Killian DJ, Ahn JH, Hubbard EJ (2006) Alterations in ribosome biogenesis cause specific defects in C. elegans hermaphrodite gonadogenesis. Dev Biol 298(1):45–58
Wang L, Eckmann CR, Kadyk LC, Wickens M, Kimble J (2002) A regulatory cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 419(6904):312–316
Wang C, Wilson-Berry L, Schedl T, Hansen D (2012) TEG-1 CD2BP2 regulates stem cell proliferation and sex determination in the C. elegans germ line and physically interacts with the UAF-1 U2AF65 splicing factor. Dev Dynamics 241(3):505–521. doi:10.1002/dvdy.23735
Wright JE, Gaidatzis D, Senften M, Farley BM, Westhof E, Ryder SP, Ciosk R (2011) A quantitative RNA code for mRNA target selection by the germline fate determinant GLD-1. EMBO J 30(3):533–545. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.334
Yochem J, Greenwald I (1989) glp-1 and lin-12, genes implicated in distinct cell-cell interactions in C. elegans, encode similar transmembrane proteins. Cell 58(3):553–563
Zanetti S, Meola M, Bochud A, Puoti A (2011) Role of the C. elegans U2 snRNP protein MOG-2 in sex determination, meiosis, and splice site selection. Dev Biol 354(2):232–241. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.001
Zetka MC, Kawasaki I, Strome S, Muller F (1999) Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13(17):2258–2270
Zhang B, Gallegos M, Puoti A, Durkin E, Fields S, Kimble J, Wickens MP (1997) A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390(6659):477–484
Acknowledgments
Research in DH’s lab is funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. TS is funded by R01 GM085150 from the National Institutes of Health. We thank Lindsay Leahul for assistance with the figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hansen, D., Schedl, T. (2013). Stem Cell Proliferation Versus Meiotic Fate Decision in Caenorhabditis elegans . In: Schedl, T. (eds) Germ Cell Development in C. elegans. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 757. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4014-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4015-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)