Skip to main content
Book cover

Capybara pp 357–370Cite as

Counting Capybaras

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The decision-making process leading to management actions requires reliable estimates of the target population density or at least its abundance variation in space and time (Caughley 1977; Abercrombie and Verdade 1995). Capybaras apparently stand up well to anthropogenic pressures like environmental change (Verdade and Ferraz 2006) and hunting (Verdade 1996). For this reason, the species is not considered endangered in any country within its range. On the contrary, in some circumstances capybaras are considered a pest in agricultural and urban landscapes (Moreira et al. 2001; Cavalcanti 2003; Ferraz et al. 2003). In addition, they are hunted in many countries of South America (Ojasti 1991; Kaplan and Kopischke 1992). Therefore, there are two main reasons to count capybaras: sustainable use and damage control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abercrombie CL, Verdade LM (1995) Dinâmica populacional de crocodilianos: elaboração e uso de modelos. In: Larriera A, Verdade LM (eds) Conservación y Manejo de los Crocodylia de America Latina, vol 1. Fundación Banco Bica, Sao Tomé, pp 33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli PW, Rechenberg E, Conceição L, Walters P (2000) Levantamento preliminar quantitativo de Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris(Mammalia, Hydrochaeridae), na bacia do Rio Itajaí – SC. P.640. In: XXIII Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia; programa e resumos. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Cuiabá, Resumo MA 230

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers DL, Buckland ST, Zucchini W (2002) Estimating animal abundance: closed populations. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Studeny AC, Magurran AE, Newson SE (2011) Biodiversity monitoring: the relevance of detectability. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti SMC (2003) Manejo e controle de danos causados por espécies da fauna. In: Cullen L Jr, Rudran R, Valladares-Padua C (eds) Métodos de Estudo em Biologia da Conservação and manejo da Vida Silvestre. Editora UFPR, Curitiba, pp 203–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington JA, Agnarsson I, Miller JA, Kuntner M, Hormiga G (2009) Undersampling bias: the null hypothesis for singleton species in tropical arthropod surveys. J Anim Ecol 78:573–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ (1996) Abundance indices. In: Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R, Foster MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero RGA, Ojasti J (1981) Comparison of the capybara populations of open and forested habitats. J Wildl Manage 45:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha HJ, Pinha PRS, Moreira JR, Carvalho JP, Hercos EAP (2002) Análise de poder para monitoramento de capivaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) no Lago Paranoá – Brasília. In: Simpósio Ecologia e Biodiversidade do Cerrado, vol 21, Perspectivas e desafios para o Século. Embrapa Sede, Brasília, p 43, Resumo 132

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DE, Winstead RL (1980) Estimating the number of wildlife populations. In: Schemnitz SD (ed) Wildlife management techniques manual, 4th edn. The Widlife Society, Washington, DC, pp 221–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF, Redford KH (1999) Mammals of the Neotropics. vol 3, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz KPMB, Verdade LM (2001) Ecologia comportamental da capivara: bases biológicas para o manejo da espécie. In: Mattos WRS (ed) A Produção Animal na Visão dos Brasileiros. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Piracicaba, pp 589–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz KPMB, Santos-Filho RMF, Piffer TRO, Verdade LM (2001) Biologia e manejo da capivara: do controle de danos ao máximo rendimento sustentável. In: Mattos WRS (ed) A Produção Animal na Visão dos Brasileiros. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Piracicaba, pp 580–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz KPMB, Lechevalier M-A, Couto HTZ, Verdade LM (2003) Damage caused by capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) on a cornfield in São Paulo, Brasil. Sci Agríc 60(1):191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz KMPMB, Peterson AT, Scachetti-Pereira R, Vettorazzi CA, Verdade LM (2009) Distribution of capybaras in an agroecosystem, Southeastern Brazil, based on ecological niche modeling. J Mammal 90(1):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz KMPMB, Manly B, Verdade LM (2010) The influence of environmental variables on capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris: Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) detectability in anthropogenic environments of southeastern Brazil. Popul Ecol 52:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera EA, Chemello ME, Lacey EA, Salas V, Sousa BF (2004) Characterization of microsatellite markers from capybaras, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris(Rodentia: Hydrochoeridae). Mol Ecol Notes 4:541–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan H, Kopischke K (1992) Resource use, traditional technology, and change among native peoples of lowland South America. In: Redford KH, Padoch C (eds) Conservation of neotropical forests: working from traditional resource use. Collumbia University Press, New York, pp 83–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper Collins, Nova York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancia RA, Nichols JD, Pollock KH (1996) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, 5th edn. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 215–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancia RA, Kendall WL, Pollock KH, Nichols JD (2005) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In: Braun CE (ed) Techniques for wildlife investigations and management, vol 6. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 106–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavorenti A (1989) Domestication and potential for genetic improvement of capybara. Rev Bras Genét 12(3):137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner PN (1996) Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord RD, Lord VR (1988) Cross checking censuses and a model of the annual cycle of mortality and reproduction in capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 23:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson WE, Mourão G (2003) Estatística sem Matemática. Editora Planta, Londrina

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson WE, Lima AP, Luizão R, Luizão F, Costa FRC, Castilho CV, Kinupp VF (2005) RAPELD: a modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites. Biota Neotrop 5(2):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum H (2000) Population parameters: estimation for ecological models. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills LS, Griffin PC, Hodges KE, McKelvey K, Ruggiero L, Ulizio T (2005) Pellet count indices compared to mark-recapture estimates for evaluating snowshoe hare density. J Wildl Manage 69:1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira JR, Pinha PRS, Cunha HJ (2001) Capivaras do Lago Paranoá. In: Fonseca FO (ed) Olhares sobre o Lago Paranoá. Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos, Brasília, pp 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourão G, Campos Z (1995) Survey of the broad-snouted caiman Caiman latirostris, marsh deer Blastocerus dichotomusand capybara Hydrochaeris hydrochaerisin the area to be inundated by Porto Primavera dam, Brazil. Biol Conserv 73:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourão GM, Magnusson WE (2004) Uso de levantamentos aéreos para o manejo de populações silvestres. Embrapa-CPAP, Corumbá, Brazil. Documentos 61:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourão GM, Bayliss P, Coutinho ME, Abercrombie CL, Arruda A (1994) Test of an aerial survey for caiman and other wildlife in the Pantanal, Brazil. Wildl Soc Bull 22:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD (1996) Sources of variation in migratory movements of animal populations: statistical inference and a selective review of empirical results for birds. In: Rhodes OE, Chesser RK, Smith MH (eds) Population dynamics in ecological space and time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 147–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojasti J (1973) Estudio Biologico del Chigüire o Capibara. FONAIAP, Caracas

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojasti J (1991) Human exploitation of capybara. In: Robinson JG, Redford KH (eds) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 236–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzini FFPHA et al (2012) The Brazilian program for diodiversity research (PPBio) information system. Biodivers Ecol 4: 10p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinha PS, Waga IC, Moreira JR (2003) Decréscimo populacional de capivaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) no lago Paranoá – Brasília. In: VI Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil: Anais de Trabalhos Completos. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, pp 564–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto GRM (2003) Contagem de fezes como índice de abundância de capivaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris). M.Sc. Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto GRM, Ferraz KMPMB, Couto HTZ, Verdade LM (2006) Detectability of capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) in forested habitats. Biota Neotrop 6(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumptre AJ (2000) Monitoring mammal populations with line transect techniques in African forests. J Appl Ecol 37:356–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston FW (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41:612–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Menegheti JO (1997) Densidade e uso dos hábitats por capivaras, Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris(Linnaeus, 1766) (Mammalia; Rodentia) na Estação Ecológica de Aracuri, Muitos Capões, RS. Biociências 5:173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader-Frechette K (1995) Methodological rules for four classes of scientific uncertainty. In: Lemons J (ed) Scientific uncertainty and environmental problem solving. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp 12–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1973) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Fryxell JM, Caughley G (2006) Wildlife ecology, conservation, and management, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden, p 469

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (2006) Ecological census techniques: a handbook, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 432

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas FC, Vargas SC, Moro MEG, Silva V, Carrer CRO (2007) Monitoramento populacional de capivaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaerisLinnaeus, 1766) em Pirassununga, SP, Brasil. Ciên Rural 37:1104–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdade LM (1996) The influence of hunting pressure on the social behavior of vertebrates. Rev Bras Biol 56(1):1–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verdade LV (2004) A exploração da fauna silvestre no Brasil: jacarés, sistemas e recursos humanos. Biota Neotrop 4(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdade LM, Ferraz KMPMB (2006) Capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) on an anthropogenic habitat in Southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 66(1b):371–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waga IC, Pinha PS, Moreira JR (2003) Efeito da pressão antrópica sobre o tamanho populacional de capivaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) em uma unidade de conservação em Brasília. VI Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil: Anais de Trabalhos Completos. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, pp 308–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal poplations. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) partially funded this study. JRM is grateful for the support provided by Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa Família Alencar (Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano M. Verdade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verdade, L.M., Moreira, J.R., Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B. (2013). Counting Capybaras. In: Moreira, J., Ferraz, K., Herrera, E., Macdonald, D. (eds) Capybara. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4000-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics