Dating and Mate Selection

Abstract

Classic and contemporary studies of mate selection share a common goal: to describe and explain how individuals in romantic unions choose one another as partners. Upon first reading, this definition may seem to imply that mate selection is concerned only with choosing a partner for a committed relationship, but the study of mate selection is much more varied and dynamic in its focus. A full understanding of mate selection requires attention to the development and maintenance of romantic relationships, including their very beginnings and endings and the ups and downs in between. In this chapter, we review research aimed at these topics and suggest ways in which they are and are not being addressed. Because other chapters in this volume are devoted to cohabitation and to gay and lesbian relationships, we concentrate on mate selection in heterosexual relationships, and we discuss cohabitation only as it pertains to contemporary dating relationships and mate selection.

Keywords

Transportation Income Assimilation Posit 

References

  1. Batson, C. D., Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2006). Interracial and intraracial patterns of mate selection among America’s diverse Black populations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Binstock, G., & Thornton, A. (2003). Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family context in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bumpass, L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 913–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, L., & Surra, C. A. (2012). Research on close relationships: Call for an interdisciplinary integration. In L. Campbell & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Texas symposium on close relationships. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 15, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cherlin, A. J., Cross-Barnet, C., Burton, L. M., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2008). Promises they can keep: Low-income women’s attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crissey, S. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowder, K. D., & Tolnay, S. E. (2000). A new marriage squeeze for black women: The role of racial intermarriage by black men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 702–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. J. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fields, J. (2004). America’s families and living arrangements: 2003 (Current Population Reports; Population Characteristics P20-553). Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Forste, R., & Tanfer, K. (1996). Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting, and married women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1993). Mate availability and family structure among African Americans in U. S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu, V. K. (2001). Racial intermarriage pairings. Demography, 38, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaughan, M. (2002). The substitution hypothesis: The impact of premarital liaisons and human capital on marital timing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldscheider, F., & Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the study of union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graefe, D. R., & Lichter, D. T. (2002). Marriage among unwed mothers: Whites, Blacks and Hispanics compared. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gullickson, A. (2006). Education and Black-White interracial marriage. Demography, 43, 673–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harknett, K. (2008). Mate availability and unmarried parent relationships. Demography, 45, 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hohmann-Marriott, B. E. (2006). Shared beliefs and the union stability of married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jepsen, L. K., & Jepsen, C. A. (2002). An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Demography, 39, 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships (1st ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  34. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  35. Lewis, S. K., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Nonhispanic Whites in the United States. Demography, 37, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lichter, D. T., LeClere, F. B., & McGlaughlin, D. K. (1991). Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of Black and White women. The American Journal of Sociology, 96, 843–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart, G., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lloyd, K. (2006). Latinas’ transition to first marriage: An examination of four theoretical perspectives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 993–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2003). Child gender and the transition to marriage. Demography, 40, 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manning, W. D. (1993). Marriage and cohabitation following premarital conception. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manning, W. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manning, W. D., & Landale, N. S. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manning, W., & Smock, P. J. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography, 32, 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGinnis, S. L. (2003). Cohabiting, dating and perceived costs of marriage: A model of marriage entry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLaughlin, D. K., & Lichter, D. T. (1997). Poverty and the marital behavior of young women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York, NY: Aldine DeGruyter.Google Scholar
  53. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.Google Scholar
  54. Osborne, C. (2005). Marriage following the birth of a child among cohabiting and visiting parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Osborne, C., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents’ relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1345–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raley, R. K. (1996). A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in black-white differences in marriage rates. American Sociological. Review, 61, 973–83.Google Scholar
  58. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2002). Measures of assimilation in the marriage market: Mexican Americans, 1970–1990. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanchez, L. A., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. A. (1998). Sex-specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27, 280–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schoen, R., & Cheng, Y. A. (2006). Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schoen, R., Landale, N. S., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44, 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schoen, R. S., & Weinick, R. M. (1993). Partner choice in marriages and cohabitations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940–2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Simmons, T., & O’Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000 (Census 2000 Special Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.Google Scholar
  68. Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding vs. deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stewart, S. D., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2003). Union formation among men in the U. S.: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Surra, C. A., Boettcher-Burke, T. M. J., Cottle, N. R., West, A. R., & Gray, C. R. (2007). The treatment of relationship status in research on dating and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Surra, C. A., Gray, C. R., Boettcher, T. M. J., Cottle, N. R., & West, A. R. (2006). From courtship to universal properties: Research on dating and mate selection, 1950 to 2003. In D. Perlman & A. Vangelisti (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 113–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America’s families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1234–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). America’s family and living arrangements: 2008. Table A1: Marital status of people 15 years and over, by age, sex, personal earnings, race, and Hispanic origin. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2008.html.
  75. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Table MS-2: Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/ms2.pdf.
  76. Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 835–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage: Rates, characteristics vary by race and gender. Pew Research Center: Social and Demographic Trends.Google Scholar
  79. Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York  2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Behavioral Sciences and EducationPenn State University HarrisburgMiddletownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations