Dating and Mate Selection
Classic and contemporary studies of mate selection share a common goal: to describe and explain how individuals in romantic unions choose one another as partners. Upon first reading, this definition may seem to imply that mate selection is concerned only with choosing a partner for a committed relationship, but the study of mate selection is much more varied and dynamic in its focus. A full understanding of mate selection requires attention to the development and maintenance of romantic relationships, including their very beginnings and endings and the ups and downs in between. In this chapter, we review research aimed at these topics and suggest ways in which they are and are not being addressed. Because other chapters in this volume are devoted to cohabitation and to gay and lesbian relationships, we concentrate on mate selection in heterosexual relationships, and we discuss cohabitation only as it pertains to contemporary dating relationships and mate selection.
KeywordsTransportation Income Assimilation Posit
- Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, L., & Surra, C. A. (2012). Research on close relationships: Call for an interdisciplinary integration. In L. Campbell & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Texas symposium on close relationships. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. J. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Fields, J. (2004). America’s families and living arrangements: 2003 (Current Population Reports; Population Characteristics P20-553). Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships (1st ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York, NY: Aldine DeGruyter.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.Google Scholar
- Raley, R. K. (1996). A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in black-white differences in marriage rates. American Sociological. Review, 61, 973–83.Google Scholar
- Simmons, T., & O’Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000 (Census 2000 Special Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.Google Scholar
- Surra, C. A., Gray, C. R., Boettcher, T. M. J., Cottle, N. R., & West, A. R. (2006). From courtship to universal properties: Research on dating and mate selection, 1950 to 2003. In D. Perlman & A. Vangelisti (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 113–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). America’s family and living arrangements: 2008. Table A1: Marital status of people 15 years and over, by age, sex, personal earnings, race, and Hispanic origin. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2008.html.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Table MS-2: Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/ms2.pdf.
- Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage: Rates, characteristics vary by race and gender. Pew Research Center: Social and Demographic Trends.Google Scholar
- Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.Google Scholar