Ethical and Legal Considerations
Ethics are the standards that societies, organizations, and professions establish to define expectations for behavior among members of that group. They broadly define right from wrong and create expectations of appropriate behavior. Laws, regulations, and policies are used to more clearly define ethical behavior and to impose sanctions for wrongful actions. This chapter will describe established ethical and legal principles that anesthetists should consider when acting appropriately and professionally within their practice. Because laws, regulations, and policies differ among states and within institutions, anesthetists must familiarize themselves with the proper policies where they practice.
KeywordsDementia Respiration Toll Karen
- American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Current Opinions with Annotations, Chicago: American Medical Association. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics.pageandwww.ASAhq.org.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists: Perioperative DNR Orders to Limit Resuscitation. Syllabus on Ethics, American Society of Anesthesiologists. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics.pageandhttp://www.ASAhq.org.
- Annas GJ, Densberger, JE. Competence to refuse medical treatment: Autonomy versus Paternalism, 15 Toledo L. Rev. 1984; 561 at 568.Google Scholar
- Gorman WF. Testamentary Capacity in Alzheimer’s Disease. 4 Elder L. Rev. 1996; 225.Google Scholar
- Grisso T, Applebaum PS. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment, A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press. 1998.Google Scholar
- Hoehner P. Ethical Management of the Elderly Patient. Chapter 4. Geriatric Anesthesiology. 2nd Edition. 2008.Google Scholar
- Kapp MB, Mossman D. Measuring Decisional Capacity: Cautions on the Construction of a “Capacitometer.” 2 Psych. Pub. Pol. and L. 1996; 73.Google Scholar
- Norman GV. Do-not-resuscitate Orders During Anesthesia and Urgent Procedures. Ethics in Medicine. Seattle Washington: University of Washington School of Medicine 1998.Google Scholar
- Pollock, SG. Life and Death Decisions: Who Makes Them and by What Standards? 47 Rutgers L. Rev. 1989; 505.Google Scholar
- Post LF, Blustein J, Dubler NN. 1999. The doctor-proxy relationship: An untapped resource Journal ofLaw, Medicine & Ethics 27(1):5–12. Prendergast TJ. 2001.Google Scholar
Relevant Statutes and Case Law
- Patient Self-Determination Act, 42 USCA §1395cc(f), 1992.Google Scholar
- Health Care Decisions Act; Section 5, Subtitle 6, Maryland Annotated Code; Health GeneralGoogle Scholar
- Faya v. Almaraz, 329 Md. 435; 620 A.2d 327 (1993).Google Scholar
- Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N.W. 12 (Minn. 1905).Google Scholar
- McQuitty v. Spangler, et al., 410 Md. 1; 976 A.2d 1020 (2009).Google Scholar