Abstract
E-mail survey methodology is a new and rapidly evolving field. This chapter considers and evaluates the advantages and disadvantages related to conducting online surveys identified in previous research. In particular, it describes the methodology and examines some advantages and disadvantages of conducting online survey research. Advantages include access to individuals in distant locations, the ability to reach difficult to contact participants, and the convenience of having automated data collection, which reduces researchers’ time and effort. Disadvantages of online survey research include uncertainty over the validity of the data and sampling issues, and concerns surrounding the design, implementation, and evaluation of an online survey. Future directions of the methodology are discussed.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bachman, D. P., Elfrind, J., & Vazzana, G. (2000). E-mail and snail mail face off in research. Marketing Research, 11, 10–15.
Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Raoi, H. R. (2000). On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior. Communications of the ACM, 43, 11.
Blasius, J., & Brandt, M. (2010). Representativeness in online surveys through stratified samples. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 107, 5–21.
Borkan, B. (2010). The mode effect in mixed mode surveys, mail and web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 371–380.
Converse, P. D., Wolfe, E. W., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/web. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 99–107.
Coderre, F., Mathieu, A., & St-Laurent, N. (2004). Comparison of quality of qualitative data obtained through telephone, postal and e-mail surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 46, 347–357.
Couper, M. P., Blair, J., & Tripleet, T. (1999). A comparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in US statistical agencies. Journal of official Statistics, 15, 39–56.
Dillman, D. A., Torotra, R. D., Conradt, J., & Bowerk, D. (1998, 9–13 August). Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates of surveys. Dallas, TX: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association.
Elford, J., Bolding, G., Davis, M., Sherr, L., & Hart, G. (2004). Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: A comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 4, 421–426.
Evans, J. R., & Matur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195–219.
Folkman-Curasi, C. (2001). A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs c.m.c. interviewing. International Journal of Market Research, 43, 361–375.
Goritz, A. (2004). Recruitment for online survey panels. International Journal of Market Research, 46, 411–425.
Hogg, A. (2003). Web efforts energize costumer research. Electric Perspectives, 28(5) 81–83.
International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO 26362:2009 Access panels in market, opinion, and social research-vocabulary and service requirements. Geneva: Switzerland.
Jansen, K. J., Corley, K. G., & Jansen, B. J. (2006). E-survey methodology: A review, issues, and implications. In J. D. Baker & R. Woods (Eds.), Encyclopedia of electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 1–8). Hershey, PA.: Idea Group Publishing.
Jones, R., & Pitt, N., (1999). Health survey in the workplace. Occupational Medicine, 49, 556–558.
Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 440–453.
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999). Taming the cyber frontier—techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 323–337.
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402–413.
Li, H., Kuo, C., & Russell, M. (1999). The impact of perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations, and demographics on the consumer’s online buying behavior. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5, 2.
Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 429–439.
Parks, M. R. & Floyd, C. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1, 4. Downloaded on February 1, 2011 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x/full.
Pealer, L., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D. & Dorman, S. M. (2001). The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 547–559
Ross, M. W., Tikkanen, R., & Mansson, S.-A. (2000). Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: implications for research and HIV interventions. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 749–758.
Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 3(62), 378–390.
Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2).
Sheehan, K. B. & Hoy, M. G. (1997). Using E-mail to survey internet users in the United States: Methodology and assessment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Downloaded on Februry 1, 2011 from jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue3/sheehan.htm.
Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (1999). Flaming, complaining, abstaining: How online users respond to privacy concerns. Journal of Advertising, 28, 37–51.
Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40.
Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research: An application of web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 22–30.
Taylor, H. (2000). Does internet research work? International Journal of Market Research, 42, 51–63.
Truell, A. D., Barlett, J. E, I. I., & Alexander, M. A. (2002). Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(1), 46–49.
Tse, A. C. B. (1999). Conducting electronic focus groups discussions among Chinese respondents. Journal of Market Research Society, 41, 407–415.
Tse, H. S., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249–271.
Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality & Quantity, 40(3), 435−456.
Suggested Further Readings
Baker, R., Blumberg, S. J., Brick, J. M., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennis, M., Dillman, D, Frankel, M. R., Garland, P., Groves, R. M., Kennedy, C., Krosnick, J. & Lavrakas, P. J. (2010). Research synthesis. AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 711–781.
Dillman, D. A. (2009). Internet, Mail, and Mixed Methods surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mesch, G. (2012). E-Mail Surveys. In: Gideon, L. (eds) Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3875-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3876-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)