Mail Survey in Social Research

  • Alana Henninger
  • Hung-En Sung


This chapter begins with a concise overview of the long history of the use of mail survey in the Western civilization. Then it examines the three main stages in the administration of mail survey: pre-notification, the survey packet, and the follow-up correspondence. The design of the basic components such as the outer envelope, the cover letter, the questionnaire, the return of the survey, and the assembly of the survey packet is discussed at length. A review of the methodological literature provides the basis for an empirical review of the strengths and weaknesses of this data collection method and related issues of validity and reliability. The entire presentation is aimed at providing a set of practical and tested guidelines for the planning and implementation of effective mail survey.


Mail survey  Questionnaire design  Response rate  Validity and reliability  


  1. Atkeson, L. R., Adams, A. N., Bryant, L. A., Zilberman, L., & Saunders, K. L. (2011). Considering mixed mode surveys for questions in political behavior: Using the internet and mail to get quality data at reasonable costs. Political Behavior, 33, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachman, R., & Schutt, R. K. (2007). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bourque, L., & Fielder, E. (2002). How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Brill, J. E. (2008). Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications. 27 April 2011.
  5. Brown, M. (1965). Use of a postcard query in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, Winter, 29, 635–637.Google Scholar
  6. Bruvold, N. T., & Comer, J. M. (1988). A model for estimating the response rate to a mailed survey. Journal of Business Research, 16(2), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Couper, M. P., & Groves, R. M. (1992). Interviewer reactions to alternative hardware for computer assisted personal interviewing. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 201–210Google Scholar
  8. Couper, M. P., & Groves, R. M. (1996). Household-level determinants of survey nonresponse. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dialsingh, I. (2008). Mail Survey. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. 27 April 2011.
  10. Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Dillman, D. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D., & Clark, J. R. (1993). Effects of questionnaire length, respondent friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant- addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erdos, P., & Morgan, A. J. (1970). Professional mail surveys. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  15. Fink, A. (2005). How to conduct surveys: A step by step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fowler, F. J. (1988). Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, R. J., Crask, M. R., & Kim, J. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greer, T. V., Chuchinprakarn, N., & Seshardri, S. (2000). Likelihood of participating in survey research: Business respondents’ perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groves, R. M. (1987). Research on survey data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 156–172.Google Scholar
  20. Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Groves, R. M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. C. (2000). Leverage-salience theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly,64, 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jepson, C., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(1), 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jobber, D., & Saunders, J. (1993). A note on the applicability of the Brurold-Comer model of mail survey response rates to commercial populations. Journal of Business Research, 26, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, R., Zhou, M., & Yates, W. (2000). Improving return rates for health-care outcome. Psychological Reports, 87(2), 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kropf, M. E., & Blair, J. (2005). Eliciting survey cooperation: Incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation. Evaluation Review, 29(6), 559–575.Google Scholar
  28. Linsky, A. S. (1975). Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: A review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(1), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mangione, T. W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Mason, W., Dressel, R., & Bain, R. (1961). An experimental study of factors affecting response to a mail survey of beginning teachers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(Summer), 296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mowen, J. C., & Cialdini, R. B. (1980). On implementing the door-in-the-face compliance technique in a business context. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(2), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sahlqvist, S., Song, Y., Bull, F., Adams, E., Preston, J., & Ogilvie, D. (2011). Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steele, T. J., Schwendig, W. L., & Kilpatrick, J. A. (1992, March/April). Duplicate responses to multiple survey mailings: A problem? Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 26–34.Google Scholar
  35. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Leiter, J., & Thompson, S. (1994). Organisational survey non-response. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trassell, N., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2004). The influence of incremental increases in token cash incentives on mail survey response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(3), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolf, J. (2008). Self-Administered Questionnaire. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications. 27 April 2011.
  38. Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 613–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Graduate Center, The City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeJohn Jay College of CriminalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations